In:Word Classes: Nature, typology and representations
Edited by Raffaele Simone and Francesca Masini
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 332] 2014
► pp. 263–282
Half and other unique words
Corpus patterns and lexicalist syntax
Published online: 24 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.332.14jan
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.332.14jan
Word classes play a fundamental role in many parts of linguistics. Yet, when looking at words individually, there is a large ‘class’ of words that does not behave like any other. This is illustrated here by describing the idiosyncratic behaviour of one such word: half. Half is labeled in many different ways: an adjective, a predeterminer, a quantifier, but it does not behave like any of these. For an accurate modeling of the combinatorics of half, and many other words like it, a more lexically driven approach is needed, since merely assigning them to a word class does not do their behaviour justice. This article describes how the behaviour or half, and other non-classifiable words, can be modeled in an extended version of Corpus Pattern Analysis (CPA), a framework that represents the behaviour of words, typically verbs, by generalizing over their actual occurrences in corpus data.
References (17)
Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. “The Case for Case”. Universals in Linguistic Theory ed. By Emmon Bach & Robert Thomas Harms, 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Ganter, Bernard & Rudolf Wille. 1998. Formal Concept Analysis. Mathematical foundations. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Hanks, Patrick. 1994. “Linguistic Norms and Pragmatic Exploitations, or Why Lexicographers Need Prototype Theory and Vice Versa”. Papers in Computational Lexicography: Complex ‘94 ed. by Ferenc Kiefer, Gábor Kiss & Júlia Pajzs. Budapest: Hungary Academy of Science.
Hanks, Patrick & James Pustejovsky. 2005. “A Pattern Dictionary for Natural Language Processing”. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée 10:2.63–82.
Hearst, Marti A. 1992. “Automatic Acquisition of Hyponyms from Large Text Corpora”.
Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Computational Linguistics
, 539–545.
Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Koenig, Jean-Pierre & Anthony R. Davis. 2001. “Sublexical Modality and the Structure of Lexical Semantics”. Linguistics and Philosophy 24.71–124.
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternation: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mel’čuk, Igor, Nadia Arbatchewsky-Jumarie, Léo Elnitsky, Lidija Iordanskaja & Adèle Lessard. 1984. Dictionnaire explicatif et combinatoire du français contemporain. Recherches lexico-sémantiques I. Montréal: Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal.
Mel’čuk, Igor, Nadia Arbatchewsky-Jumarie, Louise Dagenais, Léo Elnitsky, Lidija Iordanskaja, Marie-Noëlle Lefebvre & Suzanne Mantha. 1988. Dictionnaire explicatif et combinatoire du français contemporain. Recherches lexico-sémantiques II. Montréal: Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal.
Mel’čuk, Igor, Nadia Arbatchewsky-Jumarie, Lidija Iordanskaja & Suzanne Mantha. 1992. Dictionnaire explicatif et combinatoire du français contemporain. Recherches lexico-sémantiques III. Montréal: Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal.
Nunberg, Geoffrey. 1979. The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions: Polysemy. Linguistics and Philosophy 3 (2): 143–184.
Pollard, Carl & Ivan A. Sag. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
