Cover not available

In:Word Classes: Nature, typology and representations
Edited by Raffaele Simone and Francesca Masini
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 332] 2014
► pp. 181200

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (40)
Ackermann, Farrel. 1992. “Complex Predicates and Morphological Relatedness: Locative alternations”. Lexical Matters (= CSLI Lecture Notes 24) ed. by Ivan Sag & Anna Szabolcsi, 55–84. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andor, József & Tamás Pólya. 2001. “A Frame-based, Lexicalist Approach to Describing Functions of the Verbal Prefix ‘le-’ in Hungarian”. Színes eszmék nem alszanak: Szépe György 70. születésnapjára [Colorful Ideas Do Not Sleep: A Festschrift for György Szépe for His 70th Birthday] ed. by József Andor & Tibor Szűcs, 67–83. Pécs: Lingua Franca Csoport.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anward, Jan, Edith Moravcsik & Leon Stassen. 1997. “Parts of Speech: A challenge for typology”. Linguistic Typology 1–2.167–184.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benczédy, József & Rácz Endre. 1982. A mai magyar nyelv [Today’s Hungarian Language]. Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhat, Shankara D.N. 2000. “Word Classes and Sentential Functions”.Vogel & Comrie, eds. 2000, 47–65.
Booij, Geert & Ans van Kemenade. 2003. “Preverbs: An introduction”. Yearbook of Morphology 2003 ed. by Geert Booij & Ans van Kemenade, 1–11. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Craig, Colette. 1991. “Ways to Go in Rama: A case study in polygrammaticalization”. Approaches to Grammaticalization (= TSL 19) ed. by Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine, vol. II, 455–492. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Craig, Colette & Ken Hale. 1988. “Relational Preverbs in Some Languages of the Americas: Typological and historical perspectives”. Language 64:2.312–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 2006. Syntaxe générale. Une introduction typologique, 2 vols. Paris: Lavoisier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dehé, Nicole, Ray Jackendoff, Andrew McIntyre & Silke Urban, eds. 2002. Verb-Particle Explorations. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 2001. Syntax, 2 vols. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grinevald, Colette, Caroline Imbert & Anna Sőrés. 2011. “Pour une catégorie de “satellite” de Trajectoire dans une approche fonctionnelle-typologique”. Cahiers de Faits de langues3, 99–116. Paris: Ophrys.
Iacobini, Claudio & Francesca Masini. 2006. “The Emergence of Verb-Particle Constructions in Italian: Locative and actional meanings”. Morphology 16:2.155–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Imbert, Caroline. 2010. “Multiple Preverbation in Homeric Greek. A typological insight.” CogniTextes [Online] 4:2010 ([URL]).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Systems Dynamics and Functional Motivations in Path Coding. A typological description of Homeric Greek and Old English. Ph.D. dissertation, CNRS Laboratory “Dynamique du Langage”, University of Lyon 2.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soltész, Katalin J. 1959. Az ősi magyar igekötők [Old Hungarian Preverbs]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kenesei, István. 2000. “Szavak, szófajok, toldalékok” [Words, Word Classes, Affixes]. Strukturális magyar nyelvtan [Structural Grammar of Hungarian] ed. by Ferenc Kiefer, vol. 3, 75–98. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kenesei, István, Robert M. Vágó & Anna Fenyvesi. 1998. Hungarian. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keszler, Borbála, ed. 2000. Magyar grammatika [Hungarian Grammar]. Budapest: Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiefer, Ferenc & Katalin É. Kiss, eds. 1994. Syntax and Semantics. The syntactic structure of Hungarian. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiefer, Ferenc & Mária Ladányi. 2000. “Az igekötők” [Preverbs]. Strukturális magyar nyelvtan [Structural Grammar of Hungarian] ed. by Ferenc Kiefer, vol. 3, 453–518. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiefer, Ferenc & László Honti. 2003. “Verbal ‘Prefixation’ in the Uralic Languages”. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 50.137–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiss, Katalin É., Ferenc Kiefer & Péter Siptar. 1998. Új magyar nyelvtan [New grammar of Hungarian]. Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Komlósy, András. 1992. “Régensek és vonzatok” [Regents and Complements]. Strukturális magyar nyelvtan I. Mondattan [Syntax] ed. by Ferenc Kiefer, 299–527. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. “Complements and Adjuncts”. Kiefer & Kiss, eds. 1994, 91–178.
Kopecka, Anetta. 2004. “Étude typologique de l’expression de l’espace: Localisation et déplacement en français et en polonais”. Ph.D. dissertation, Université Lumière Lyon 2.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kopecka, Anetta & Miyuki Ishibashi. 2011. “L’(a)symétrie dans l’expression de la source et du but: perspective translinguistique”. Cahiers de Faits de langues 3, 131–149. Paris: Ophrys.
Nyéki, Lajos. 1988. Grammaire pratique du hongrois d’aujourd’hui. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Országh, László. 1973. Magyar-angol kéziszótár [A Concise Hungarian-English Dictionary]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perrot, Jean, ed. 2002. Magyar-francia kéziszótár [A Concise Hungarian-French Dictionary]. Szeged: Grimm Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rousseau, André, ed. 1995. Les préverbes dans les langues d’Europe. Introduction à l’étude de la préverbation. Lille: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simone, Raffaele. 1996. “Esistono verbi sintagmatici in italiano?” Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 3.47–61.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “Verbi sintagmatici come costruzione e come categoria”. I verbi sintagmatici in italiano e nelle varietà dialettali. Stato dell’arte e prospettive di ricerca ed. by Monica Cini, 13–30. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sőrés, Anna. 2006. Le hongrois dans la typologie des langues. Limoges: Lambert-Lucas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szende, Thomas & Georges Kassai. 2001. Grammaire fondamentale du hongrois. Paris: L’Asiathèque.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tallerman, Maggie. 1998. Understanding Syntax. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. “Lexicalization Pattern: Semantic structure in lexical forms”. Language Typology and Syntactic Description ed. by Timothy Shopen, vol. 3, 57–77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. 2 vols. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tompa, József, ed. 1970. “A mai magyar nyelv rendszere. Leíró nyelvtan” [The Structure of the Modern Hungarian Language. Descriptive grammar I]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vogel, Petra M. & Bernard Comrie, eds. 2000. Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue