In:Word Classes: Nature, typology and representations
Edited by Raffaele Simone and Francesca Masini
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 332] 2014
► pp. 181–200
On the borders of neglected word classes
From preverbs to ‘satellites’ via adverbs and particles
Published online: 24 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.332.10sor
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.332.10sor
This paper proposes a functional word class called “path satellites” that includes adverbs, particles, verbal prefixes, and preverbs expressing direction or orientation of motion. The starting point of the analysis is Hungarian, which has a specific set of morphemes considered in different grammars either as a subclass of adverbs or as a specific word class called “preverb”. A detailed description of the semantic and syntactic properties of spatial preverbs in Hungarian and a comparison with adverbs enables two separate classes to be established in this language. However, as many examples presented here show, several other items in different languages have important functional similarities with Hungarian preverbs, e.g. particles or verbal prefixes in German, Italian, Polish, Ancient Greek or in Mayan languages. Moving beyond the traditional semantic, morphological and syntactic criteria that have been used in identifying word classes enables us to demonstrate the functional commonalities of the elements discussed, which are labeled differently in the grammars of individual languages. Adopting the term “satellite” proposed by Talmy is useful for the description of this class of grammatical items moving in the verbal sphere.
References (40)
Ackermann, Farrel. 1992. “Complex Predicates and Morphological Relatedness: Locative alternations”. Lexical Matters (= CSLI Lecture Notes 24) ed. by Ivan Sag & Anna Szabolcsi, 55–84. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Andor, József & Tamás Pólya. 2001. “A Frame-based, Lexicalist Approach to Describing Functions of the Verbal Prefix ‘le-’ in Hungarian”. Színes eszmék nem alszanak: Szépe György 70. születésnapjára [Colorful Ideas Do Not Sleep: A Festschrift for György Szépe for His 70th Birthday] ed. by József Andor & Tibor Szűcs, 67–83. Pécs: Lingua Franca Csoport.
Anward, Jan, Edith Moravcsik & Leon Stassen. 1997. “Parts of Speech: A challenge for typology”. Linguistic Typology 1–2.167–184.
Benczédy, József & Rácz Endre. 1982. A mai magyar nyelv [Today’s Hungarian Language]. Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó.
Bhat, Shankara D.N. 2000. “Word Classes and Sentential Functions”.Vogel & Comrie, eds. 2000, 47–65.
Booij, Geert & Ans van Kemenade. 2003. “Preverbs: An introduction”. Yearbook of Morphology 2003 ed. by Geert Booij & Ans van Kemenade, 1–11. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Craig, Colette. 1991. “Ways to Go in Rama: A case study in polygrammaticalization”. Approaches to Grammaticalization (= TSL 19) ed. by Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine, vol. II, 455–492. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Craig, Colette & Ken Hale. 1988. “Relational Preverbs in Some Languages of the Americas: Typological and historical perspectives”. Language 64:2.312–344.
Dehé, Nicole, Ray Jackendoff, Andrew McIntyre & Silke Urban, eds. 2002. Verb-Particle Explorations. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Grinevald, Colette, Caroline Imbert & Anna Sőrés. 2011. “Pour une catégorie de “satellite” de Trajectoire dans une approche fonctionnelle-typologique”. Cahiers de Faits de langues3, 99–116. Paris: Ophrys.
Iacobini, Claudio & Francesca Masini. 2006. “The Emergence of Verb-Particle Constructions in Italian: Locative and actional meanings”. Morphology 16:2.155–188.
Imbert, Caroline. 2010. “Multiple Preverbation in Homeric Greek. A typological insight.” CogniTextes [Online] 4:2010 ([URL]).
. 2008. Systems Dynamics and Functional Motivations in Path Coding. A typological description of Homeric Greek and Old English. Ph.D. dissertation, CNRS Laboratory “Dynamique du Langage”, University of Lyon 2.
Soltész, Katalin J. 1959. Az ősi magyar igekötők [Old Hungarian Preverbs]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Kenesei, István. 2000. “Szavak, szófajok, toldalékok” [Words, Word Classes, Affixes]. Strukturális magyar nyelvtan [Structural Grammar of Hungarian] ed. by Ferenc Kiefer, vol. 3, 75–98. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Kiefer, Ferenc & Katalin É. Kiss, eds. 1994. Syntax and Semantics. The syntactic structure of Hungarian. San Diego: Academic Press.
Kiefer, Ferenc & Mária Ladányi. 2000. “Az igekötők” [Preverbs]. Strukturális magyar nyelvtan [Structural Grammar of Hungarian] ed. by Ferenc Kiefer, vol. 3, 453–518. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Kiefer, Ferenc & László Honti. 2003. “Verbal ‘Prefixation’ in the Uralic Languages”. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 50.137–153.
Kiss, Katalin É., Ferenc Kiefer & Péter Siptar. 1998. Új magyar nyelvtan [New grammar of Hungarian]. Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.
Komlósy, András. 1992. “Régensek és vonzatok” [Regents and Complements]. Strukturális magyar nyelvtan I. Mondattan [Syntax] ed. by Ferenc Kiefer, 299–527. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
. 1994. “Complements and Adjuncts”. Kiefer & Kiss, eds. 1994, 91–178.
Kopecka, Anetta. 2004. “Étude typologique de l’expression de l’espace: Localisation et déplacement en français et en polonais”. Ph.D. dissertation, Université Lumière Lyon 2.
Kopecka, Anetta & Miyuki Ishibashi. 2011. “L’(a)symétrie dans l’expression de la source et du but: perspective translinguistique”. Cahiers de Faits de langues 3, 131–149. Paris: Ophrys.
Országh, László. 1973. Magyar-angol kéziszótár [A Concise Hungarian-English Dictionary]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Perrot, Jean, ed. 2002. Magyar-francia kéziszótár [A Concise Hungarian-French Dictionary]. Szeged: Grimm Kiadó.
Rousseau, André, ed. 1995. Les préverbes dans les langues d’Europe. Introduction à l’étude de la préverbation. Lille: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.
Simone, Raffaele. 1996. “Esistono verbi sintagmatici in italiano?” Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 3.47–61.
. 2008. “Verbi sintagmatici come costruzione e come categoria”. I verbi sintagmatici in italiano e nelle varietà dialettali. Stato dell’arte e prospettive di ricerca ed. by Monica Cini, 13–30. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. “Lexicalization Pattern: Semantic structure in lexical forms”. Language Typology and Syntactic Description ed. by Timothy Shopen, vol. 3, 57–77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
