In:Word Classes: Nature, typology and representations
Edited by Raffaele Simone and Francesca Masini
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 332] 2014
► pp. 119–138
Qualifying modifier encoding and adjectival typology
Published online: 24 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.332.07alf
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.332.07alf
Parts of speech are not primitive notions, they derive from the constructions defining them. Constructions, in turn, can be classified according to a mainly semantic or semantic-syntactic approach. In this paper I follow the latter view: the “adjective” is defined as the most typical construction coding the quality modifier of the noun and a cross-linguistic typology of quality modifier constructions is presented.
References (31)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1985. Typological Distinction in Word-formation. Timothy Shopen, ed. 1985, vol. III, 1–65.
Alfieri, Luca. 2009. “La categoria dell’aggettivo in vedico”. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 94:1.3–49.
. 2011. “A Radical Construction Grammar approach to Vedic adjectives”, Rivista degli Studi Orientali 84:1–4. 241–255.
. 2013. “Review of Parts of speech. Empirical and theoretical advances ed. by Umberto Ansaldo, Jan Don & Roland Pfau”. Studies in Language 37:2.425–434.
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by Itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Conrad, Robert J. & Kepas Wogiga. 1991. An Outline of Bukiyip Grammar. Canberra: Canberra University Press.
Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The cognitive organization of information. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
. 2000. Parts of Speech as Language Universals and as Language-particular Categories. Petra M. Vogel & Bernard Comrie, eds. 2000, 65–101.
. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2005. “Word-classes, Part of Speech and Syntactic Argumentation”. Linguistic Typology 9:3.431–441.
Dixon, R.M.W. 2004. “Adjective Classes in Typological Perspective”. Adjective Classes: A cross-linguistic typology ed. R.M.W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, 1–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2012. “How to Compare Major Word-Classes across the World’s Languages”. Theories of Everything: In honor of Ed Keenan ed. by Thomas Graf, Denis Paperno, Anna Szabolcsi & Jos Tellings, 109–130. (= UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics
17.) Los Angeles: University of California.
Hengeveld, Kees. 1992. Non Verbal Predication: Theory, typology, diachrony. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kämpfe, Hans-Rainer & Alexander P. Volodin. 1995. Abriss der tschuktschischen Grammatik auf der Basis der Schriftsprache. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Lazard, Gilbert. 1999. “La question de la distinction entre nom et verbe en perspective typologique”. Folia Linguistica 33:3/4.389–418 [reprinted as Lazard, Gilbert. 2001. Études de linguistique générale: typologie grammaticale. Paris: Paytot].
Newman, Paul. 2000. The Hausa Language. An encyclopedic reference grammar. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Shopen, Timothy. 1985. Language Typology and Syntactic Description, 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Alfieri, Luca
2021. Parts of speech, comparative concepts and Indo-European linguistics. In Linguistic Categories, Language Description and Linguistic Typology [Typological Studies in Language, 132], ► pp. 313 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
