In:Word Classes: Nature, typology and representations
Edited by Raffaele Simone and Francesca Masini
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 332] 2014
► pp. 37–50
Classes of creation verbs
Published online: 24 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.332.03jez
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.332.03jez
This paper introduces a taxonomy for creation verbs consisting in two main classes: create verbs and verbs of derived creation. Each class has subclasses which are discussed in detail. I argue that while verbs belonging to the first class have creation as their core sense, verbs of derived creation either have another sense as primary or are underspecified, and take on a creation reading only in verb-argument composition. The overall goal of the paper is to support this distinction through a corpus-informed qualitative analysis of the semantic and syntactic properties of a target set of verbs belonging to both classes. Particularly, starting from intuitive semantic groupings, I pin down the syntactic features shared by verbs belonging to each group and propose a classification at the syntax/semantic interface. Results of the analysis show that the proposed distinction is empirically grounded.
References (20)
Atkins, B.T. Sue, Judith Kegl & Beth Levin. 1988. “Anatomy of a Verb Entry: From linguistic theory to lexicographic practice”. International Journal of Lexicography 1:2.84–126.
Bisetto, Antonietta & Chiara Melloni. 2007. “Result Nominals: A lexical-semantic investigation’”. On-line Proceedings of the Fifth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM5), Fréjus 15–18 September 2005 ed. by Geert Booij, Bernard Fradin, Emiliano Guevara, Sergio Scalise & Angela Ralli, 393–412. Bologna: University of Bologna.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1986. “Pragmatically Controlled Zero Anaphora”. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society ed. by Vassiliki Nikiforidou, Mary Van Clay, Mary Niepokuj & Deborah Feder, 95–107. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Jezek, Elisabetta & Chiara Melloni. 2011. “Nominals, Polysemy, and Co-predication”. Journal of Cognitive Science 12.1–31.
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternation. A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1999. “Two Structures for Compositionally Derived Events”.
The Proceedings of SALT IX
ed. by Tanya Matthews & Devon Strolovitch, 199–223. Ithaca, N. Y.: CLC Publications.
Osswald, Rainer. 2005. “On Result Nominalization in German”. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 9 ed. by Emar Maier, Corien Bary & Janneke Huitink, 256–270. Nijmegen: Nijmegen Centre of Semantics (NCS).
Piñon, Christopher. 2008. “Verbs of Creation‘’. Event Structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation ed. by Johannes Dölling, Tatjana Heyde-Zybatow & Martin Schäfer, 493–521. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.
. 2012. “Co-compositionality in Grammar”. The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality ed. by Markus Werning, Wolfram Hinzen & Edouard Machery, 371–382. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ramchand, Gillian Catriona. 2008. Verb Meaning and the Lexicon. A first-phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 2008. “Lexicalized Meaning and the Internal Temporal Structure of Events”. Crosslinguistic and Theoretical Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect ed. by Susan Rothstein, 13–42. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin. 1998. “Building Verb Meanings”. The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and compositional factors ed. by Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder, 97–134. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Lopes Amaral, Luana
2025. Creation in the semantics of verbs and constructions. Constructions and Frames 17:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Schirakowski, Barbara
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
