In:Morphology and Meaning: Selected papers from the 15th International Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2012
Edited by Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Hans Christian Luschützky and Wolfgang U. Dressler
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 327] 2014
► pp. 205–222
Semantic transparency, compounding, and the nature of independent variables
Published online: 27 February 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.327.14lib
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.327.14lib
We report on a psycholinguistic study of semantic transparency among English compound words. We employed the P3 technique (Libben et al. 2012), which combines elements of three experimental paradigms: progressive demasking, naming, and word typing. Both the progressive demasking data and the word typing data showed a graded effect of semantic transparency associated with the number and location of semantically opaque constituents in the compound. Typing duration effects were evident at the constituent boundary, supporting observations first made by Sahel et al. (2008). We suggest that these data point to the value of letter typing durations in the analysis of morphological processing and the importance of a psychocentric perspective on lexical processing – one that emphasizes the psychological nature of morphological structures.
References (21)
Aristotle. Poetics. (E.M. Edgehill, Translation), retrieved from [URL]
Baayen, R. Harald, Douglas J. Davidson & Douglas Bates. 2008. “Mixed-Effects Modeling with Crossed Random Effects for Subjects and Items”. Journal of Memory and Language 59.390–412.
Derwing, Bruce L. 1973. Transformational Grammar as a Theory of Language Acquisition: A Study in the Empirical, Conceptual and Methodological Foundations of Contemporary Linguistics. London & New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fiorentino, Robert & Ella Fund-Reznicek. 2009. “Masked Morphological Priming of Compound Constituents”. The Mental Lexicon 4:2.159–193.
Frisson, Stephen, Elizabeth Niswander-Klement & Alexander Pollatsek. 2008. “The Role of Semantic Transparency in the Processing of English Compound Words”. British Journal of Psychology 99.87–107.
Gagné, Christina L. & Thomas L. Spalding. 2009. “Constituent Integration during the Processing of Compound Words: Does it Involve the Use of Relational Structures?”. Journal of Memory and Language 60.20–35.
Grainger, Jonathan & Juan Segui. 1990. “Neighborhood Frequency Effects in Visual Word Recognition: A Comparison of Lexical Decision and Masked Identification Latencies”. Perception & Psychophysics 47.191–198.
Ji, Hong-bo, Christina Gagné L. & Thomas L. Spalding. 2011. “Benefits and Costs of Lexical Decomposition and Semantic Integration during the Processing of Transparent and Opaque English Compounds”. Journal of Memory and Language 65.406–430.
Libben, Gary. 2006. “Why Study Compounds? An Overview of the Issues”. The Representation and Processing of Compound Words ed. by Gary Libben & Gonia Jarema, 1–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2010. “Compounds, Semantic Transparency, and Morphological Transcendence”. New Impulses in Word-Formation ed. by Susan Olsen, 212–232: Hamburg: Buske.
. (forthcoming). Compound Fracture and Morphological Superstates.
Libben, Gary, Martha Gibson, Yeo-Bom Yoon & Dominiek Sandra. 2003. “Compound Fracture: The Role of Semantic Transparency and Morphological Headedness”. Brain and Language 84.26–43.
Libben, Gary, Silke Weber & Koji Miwa. 2012. “P3: A Technique for the Study of Perception, Production, and Participant Properties”. The Mental Lexicon 7:2.237–248.
Monahan, Podraic, Robert Fiorentino & David Poeppel. 2008. “Masked Repetition Priming Using Magnetoencephalography”. Brain and Language 106.65–71.
Olofsson, Arne. 1990. “On the Origins of ‘chopper’, ‘helicopter’ and moped”. American Speech 65:3.278–284.
Sahel, Said, Guido Nottbusch, Angela Grimm & Rüdiger Weingarten. 2008. “Written Production of German Compounds: Effects of Lexical Frequency and Semantic Transparency”. Written Language & Literacy 11:2.211–227.
Sandra, Dominiek. 1990. “On the Representation and Processing of Compound Words: Automatic Access to Constituent Morphemes does Not Occur”. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 42.529–567.
Singh, Rajendra. 2006. “Whole Word Morphology”. Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, 2nd edition ed. by Keith Brown, vol. 13, 578–579. Oxford: Elsevier.
Taft Marcus & Kenneth I. Forster. 1976. “Lexical Storage and Retrieval of Polymorphemic and Polysyllabic Words”. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 15.607–620.
Will, Udo, Guido Nottbusch & Rüdiger Weingarten. 2006. “Linguistic Units in Word Typing: Effects of Word Presentation Modes and Typing Delay”. Written Language & Literacy 9:1.153–176.
Cited by (18)
Cited by 18 other publications
Hagiwara, Akiko
Muschalik, Julia, Dominic Schmitz, Akhilesh Kakolu Ramarao & Dinah Baer-Henney
Song, Qichao, Xiaodong Fei & Norio Matsumi
Chandra, Mei Rianto & Clara Herlina Karjo
Park, Juana, Christina L. Gagné & Thomas L. Spalding
Yousefzadeh, Bahareh, Gary Libben & Sidney J. Segalowitz
Breadmore, Helen L., Emily Côté & S. Hélène Deacon
Kačmár, Pavol & Lívia Körtvélyessy
Taikh, Alexander, Christina Gagné & Thomas Spalding
2023. Accessing the semantic and lexical information of constituents while typing compounds. The Mental Lexicon 18:2 ► pp. 265 ff.
Gahl, Susanne & Ingo Plag
2022. Spelling errors in English derivational suffixes reflect morphological boundary strength. The Mental Lexicon ► pp. 1 ff.
Wang, Chuan
Yao, Yijia
Libben, Gary, Jordan Gallant & Wolfgang U. Dressler
Jaswal, Vikram K., Allison Wayne & Hudson Golino
Mattiello, Elisa & Wolfgang U. Dressler
Gagné, Christina L. & Thomas L. Spalding
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.