In:Historical Linguistics 2009: Selected papers from the 19th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Nijmegen, 10-14 August 2009
Edited by Ans M.C. van Kemenade and Nynke de Haas
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 320] 2012
► pp. 293–314
Word order variation in New Testament Greek wh-questions
Published online: 12 April 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.320.15kir
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.320.15kir
In this paper I address the syntax of direct object and adjunct questions in New Testament Greek from a comparative perspective. I show that direct object questions involve a two-step derivation. First, the questioned object is moved to the Specifier position of a designated Focus projection in the clausal Left Periphery. In this position it is interpreted as a question. The second step is the movement of the finite verb to the Focus head, which is reminiscent of residual Verb Second in languages like English. In contrast to direct object questions, cause/reason questions do not involve wh-movement at all, but are base-generated in the Int(errogative) projection of the updated Rizzian (2001) Left Periphery. I furthermore show that the IntP hosts non-focused adjunct wh-phrases.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
