In:Cross-Disciplinary Issues in Compounding
Edited by Sergio Scalise and Irene Vogel
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 311] 2010
► pp. 77–92
Units in compounding
Published online: 28 April 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.311.08mon
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.311.08mon
This chapter addresses such questions as ‘what kind of linguistic units are compounds?’ and ‘what kind of linguistic units are they made of?’ In order to answer these questions a strictly word-based approach is adopted, in which words (lexemes) are considered as the basic units of morphological and lexical organization cross-linguistically. Several examples in which canonical and non-canonical words appear as inputs and outputs of compounding are analyzed. It is claimed that, unlike derivation, compounding constructs both typical lexical units, and units which are not made to be lexicalized. This conclusion is consistent with the common assumption that compounding constitutes a case of mismatch between morphology and syntax.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Solivellas, Ivan
2025. La fractocomposición. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 38:1 ► pp. 56 ff.
Villoing, Florence, Delphine Tribout, Fabiola Henri & Maxime Deglas
Lami, Irene & Joost van de Weijer
Bağrıaçık, Metin & Angela Ralli
Göksel, Aslı
Martí Solano, Ramón
2014. Semantic headedness and categorization of -cum- compounds. In Morphology and Meaning [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 327], ► pp. 239 ff.
NAGANO, AKIKO & MASAHARU SHIMADA
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
