In:English Historical Linguistics 2006: Selected papers from the fourteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 14), Bergamo, 21–25 August 2006
Edited by Marina Dossena, Richard Dury and Maurizio Gotti
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 297] 2008
► pp. 1–44
The early Middle English scribe: Sprach er wie er schrieb?
Published online: 9 July 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.297.03lai
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.297.03lai
Written Middle English is not phonetic transcript. The sound-pattern is not directly known, but has to be reconstructed – from, among other things, written forms interpreted in the light of the particular spelling systems to which they belong. Pronunciation is an object of discovery, not a premiss: assumptions about the way (or ways) in which a written form was pronounced, ought not to be built in to the collection of the primary evidence. It does not follow that phonetic considerations are ruled out for subsequent interpretation. (Benskin 1991: 226)
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Rogos-Hebda, Justyna
Angerer, Michael Lysander
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
