In:English Historical Linguistics 2006: Selected papers from the fourteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 14), Bergamo, 21–25 August 2006
Edited by Richard Dury, Maurizio Gotti and Marina Dossena
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 296] 2008
► pp. 31–51
The which is most and right harde to answere: Intensifying right and most in earlier English
Published online: 9 July 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.296.05men
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.296.05men
This paper studies the intensifying use of most, comparing it to the behaviour ofright, one of the most common Middle English intensifiers. Using evidence from the Helsinki Corpus, this investigation shows that both items modify the same type of adjectival heads, namely bounded subjective positive adjectives, which suggests that they are not prototypical boosters, but come close to maximisers. While most is first found in typically comparative structures, later extending to intensifying contexts, right first occurs in intensifying environments, but can spread to superlative structures due to its original bounded nature. Most succeeds right on the temporal axis, and while it is equivalent to right in some environments, evidence from honorifics suggests that it usually indicates an even higher degree of intensification.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Visser, Lourens
2024. Old and Middle English adverbs of degree in their wider West Germanic context. NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution 77:2 ► pp. 110 ff.
Nevalainen, Terttu, Tanja Säily, Turo Vartiainen, Aatu Liimatta & Jefrey Lijffijt
D'Arcy, Alexandra
MÉNDEZ-NAYA, BELÉN
Méndez-Naya, Belén
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
