In:Voicing in Dutch: (De)voicing – phonology, phonetics, and psycholinguistics
Edited by Jeroen van de Weijer and Erik Jan van der Torre
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 286] 2007
► pp. 81–98
3. Exceptions to final devoicing
Published online: 26 October 2007
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.286.04oos
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.286.04oos
Some dialects of Dutch show systematic exceptions to final devoicing in the first person singular of verbs ending in a long or tense vowel and a fricative. This observation raises questions about the morphology – what makes the first person singular of verbs so special? –, and about the phonology – what makes fricatives after long vowels so special? As to the morphological side of things, this paper argues that the first person singular suffix, which used to be a schwa, is still present as an abstract vocalic position. From the phonological point of view, I argue that Dutch fricatives have a phonological length contrast rather than a voicing contrast. Since (empty) syllabic positions and consonant length both are expressed in the phonotactic dimension, it is expected that they interact.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Cavirani, Edoardo & Marc van Oostendorp
2017. On silent markedness. In Beyond Markedness in Formal Phonology [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 241], ► pp. 101 ff.
NICOLAE, ANDREEA C. & ANDREW NEVINS
Ouddeken, Nina
2016. Voicing distinctions in the Dutch-German dialect continuum. Linguistics in the Netherlands 33 ► pp. 106 ff.
Heeringa, Wilbert & Frans Hinskens
Vaux, Bert & Brett Miller
[no author supplied]
2019. References. In A Contrastive Grammar of Brazilian Pomeranian [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 248], ► pp. 273 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
