21. Morphological splits  Iconicity and Optimality

Nesset, Tore; Enger, Hans-Olav

doi:10.1075/cilt.218.22nes

In:Morphology 2000: Selected papers from the 9th Morphology Meeting, Vienna, 24–28 February 2000
Edited by Sabrina Bendjaballah, Wolfgang U. Dressler, Oskar E. Pfeiffer and Maria D. Voeikova
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 218] 2002
► pp. 271–282

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

21. Morphological splits Iconicity and Optimality

Tore Nesset | University of Tromsø

Hans-Olav Enger | University of Oslo

Published online: 22 March 2002

https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.218.22nes

Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Order by:

De Smet, Isabeau

2023. An assessment of the fourth law of Kuryłowicz: does prototypicality of meaning affect language change?. Cognitive Linguistics 34:2 ► pp. 261 ff.

Enger, Hans-Olav

2014. Reinforcement in inflection classes: Two cues may be better than one. Word Structure 7:2 ► pp. 153 ff.

Enger, Hans‐Olav

2007. Grammaticalisation due to homonymy avoidance In Gudbrandsdalen /æpr˛ede/?1. Transactions of the Philological Society 105:1 ► pp. 42 ff.

Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew

2005. Affixes, stems and allomorphic conditioning in paradigm function morphology. In Yearbook of Morphology 2005 [Yearbook of Morphology, ], ► pp. 253 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

21. Morphological splits  Iconicity and Optimality

Cited by four other publications

21. Morphological splits Iconicity and Optimality