This study represents a contribution to the theory of meaning in natural language. It proposes a semantic theory containing a set of regular relational principles. These principles enable semantic theory to describe connections from the lexical reading of a word to its figurative contextual reading, from one variant reading of a polysemous lexical item to another, from the idiomatic to its literal reading or to the literal reading(s) of one or more of its component lexical items. Semiotic theory provides a foundation by supplying principles defining motivated expression-content relations for signs generally. The author argues that regular semantic relational principles must dervive from such semiotic principles, to ensures the psychological reality and generality of the semantic principles.
2025. Polysemy, conjunction reduction, and copredication: handle with care!. Philosophical Psychology► pp. 1 ff.
راضي, بيداء
2025. مفهوم علم السيميائية (علم العلامات) بين الفلاسفة المسلمين ومدارس النشأة المعرفية الحديثة للنظريات السيميائية. مجلة ابن خلدون للدراسات والأبحاث 5:11
Bolumar Martínez, Irene, Daniel Alcaraz Carrión & Javier Valenzuela Manzanares
2024. A multimodal approach to polysemy: the senses of touch. Language and Cognition 16:4 ► pp. 1697 ff.
Haber, Janosch & Massimo Poesio
2024. Polysemy—Evidence from Linguistics, Behavioral Science, and Contextualized Language Models. Computational Linguistics 50:1 ► pp. 351 ff.
Murphy, Elliot
2024. Predicate order and coherence in copredication. Inquiry 67:6 ► pp. 1744 ff.
Rossi, Emilio
2024. Inclusive Signs: A Teaching and Learning Toolkit to Generate Inclusive Meta‐Design Concepts. International Journal of Art & Design Education 43:2 ► pp. 162 ff.
Brink, Nina
2023. Metonymic relations underlying the one-word utterances of Afrikaans-speaking infants and toddlers. Language and Cognition 15:1 ► pp. 86 ff.
Collins, John
2023. Copredication as Illusion. Journal of Semantics 40:2-3 ► pp. 359 ff.
Kochman-Haładyj, Bożena & Robert Kiełtyka
2023. Paradigm Shift in the Representation of Women in Anglo-American Paremiology – A Cognitive Semantics Perspective. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 68:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
2021. Categorization, Memory and Linguistic Uses: What Happens in the Case of Polysemy. In Inquiries in Philosophical Pragmatics [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 27], ► pp. 95 ff.
Hameed, May Tahseen & Hind Tahseen Hameed
2021. THE EMPLOYMENT OF ZEUGMA AND SYLLEPSIS IN ADAGES AND FAMOUS QUOTES AS A KIND OF DISCOURSE GENERA. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 9:4 ► pp. 167 ff.
Ahmadgoli, Kamran & Morteza Yazdanjoo
2020. Multimodal representation of social discourses in Asghar Farhadi’s A Separation: a social semiotic study. Social Semiotics 30:5 ► pp. 699 ff.
Kosecki, Krzysztof
2020. On Patterns of Conceptual Construal in Tok Pisin. In Cultural Conceptualizations in Language and Communication [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 43 ff.
Kosecki, Krzysztof
2023. Cognitive Semantics Against Creole Exceptionalism: On the Scope of Metonymy in the Lexicon of Nigerian Pidgin English. In Language in Educational and Cultural Perspectives [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 199 ff.
Matusz, Łukasz
2020. I will see it done: Metonymic extensions of the verb see in English. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies :31(4) ► pp. 88 ff.
2015. Structural Sensitivity as an Argument for Semantic Underspecification. In Semantics of Complex Words [Studies in Morphology, 3], ► pp. 217 ff.
Fábregas, Antonio
2016. Deconstructing the non-episodic readings of Spanish deverbal adjectives. Word Structure 9:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Bamiro, Edmund
2014. Stylistic Functions of ‘Discollocation’ in Soyinka’s Novels: A Sytemic-functional Analysis. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 4:12
Barcelona, Antonio
2014. Bogusław Bierwiaczonek, Metonymy in language, thought and brain. Sheffield: Equinox, 2013. Pp. iv + 291.. Journal of Linguistics 50:3 ► pp. 712 ff.
Saka, Paul
2013. Quotation and the Use-Mention Distinction. In Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 1], ► pp. 367 ff.
Sridhar, Kaushik
2012. Corporate conceptions of triple bottom line reporting: an empirical analysis into the signs and symbols driving this fashionable framework. Social Responsibility Journal 8:3 ► pp. 312 ff.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Günter Radden
2005. Metonymy. In Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 1 ff.
WEISS, DAVID
2005. Metonymy in Black and White: Shelby Steele's Revelatory Racial Tropes. Howard Journal of Communications 16:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Brugman, Claudia
1999. Polysemy. In Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 1 ff.
Nerlich, Brigitte & David D. Clarke
1997. Polysemy. Historiographia Linguistica 24:3 ► pp. 349 ff.
Papafragou, Anna
1996. Figurative language and the semantics-pragmatics distinction. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 5:3 ► pp. 179 ff.
Carstens, Adelia
1993. 'n Funksionele benadering tot metonimie. South African Journal of Linguistics 11:3 ► pp. 85 ff.
Swanepoel, P. H.
1992. Linguistic motivation and its lexicographical application. South African Journal of Linguistics 10:2 ► pp. 49 ff.
Norrick, Neal R.
1988. Binomial Meaning in Texts. Journal of English Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 72 ff.
Berghel, H. L. & David L. Sallach
1985. Computer Program Plagiarism Detection: The Limits of the Halstead Metric. Journal of Educational Computing Research 1:3 ► pp. 295 ff.
Nöth, Winfried
1985. Verbale und vokale Kommunikation. In Handbuch der Semiotik, ► pp. 251 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.