a post-Whorfian view: Why we subject incorporate (in English)

Thornburg, Linda L.; Panther, Klaus-Uwe

doi:10.1075/cilt.199.16tho

In:Explorations in Linguistic Relativity
Edited by Martin Pütz and Marjolijn H. Verspoor
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 199] 2000
► pp. 319–344

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

Why we subject incorporate (in English)

a post-Whorfian view

Linda L. Thornburg

Klaus-Uwe Panther

Published online: 15 April 2000

https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.199.16tho

Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Order by:

Cetnarowska, Bozena

2016. Headedness of coordinate compounds in Polish and English. In Studies in Lexicogrammar [Human Cognitive Processing, 54], ► pp. 243 ff.

Kuczok, Marcin

2016. The interplay of metaphor and metonymy in English noun+noun compounds. In Studies in Lexicogrammar [Human Cognitive Processing, 54], ► pp. 193 ff.

Bagasheva, Alexandra

2014. Compound verbs in English and Bulgarian and the relativity debate. In Multilingual Cognition and Language Use [Human Cognitive Processing, 44], ► pp. 97 ff.

Massam, Diane

2009. Noun Incorporation: Essentials and Extensions. Language and Linguistics Compass 3:4 ► pp. 1076 ff.

[no author supplied]

2024. Metaphor, metonymy and lexicogenesis [Human Cognitive Processing, 78],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.