Universal ontological knowledge and a bias toward language-specific categories in the construal of individuation

Imai, Mutsumi

doi:10.1075/cilt.198.11ima

In:Evidence for Linguistic Relativity
Edited by Susanne Niemeier and René Dirven †
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 198] 2000
► pp. 139–160

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

Universal ontological knowledge and a bias toward language-specific categories in the construal of individuation

Mutsumi Imai

Published online: 15 April 2000

https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.198.11ima

Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Order by:

Littlemore, Jeannette

2023. ‘I see less of the surroundings. The story feels different’: Construal and Second Language Learning. In Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Second Language Learning and Teaching, ► pp. 17 ff.

Lucy, John A.

2014. Methodological approaches in the study of linguistic relativity. In Multilingual Cognition and Language Use [Human Cognitive Processing, 44], ► pp. 17 ff.

Seifart, Frank

2010. Nominal Classification. Language and Linguistics Compass 4:8 ► pp. 719 ff.

Athanasopoulos, Panos

2007. Interaction between grammatical categories and cognition in bilinguals: The role of proficiency, cultural immersion, and language of instruction. Language and Cognitive Processes 22:5 ► pp. 689 ff.

Cook, Vivian, Benedetta Bassetti, Chise Kasai, Miho Sasaki & Jun Arata Takahashi

2006. Do bilinguals have different concepts? The case of shape and material in Japanese L2 users of English. International Journal of Bilingualism 10:2 ► pp. 137 ff.

Samuelson, Larissa K.

2002. Statistical regularities in vocabulary guide language acquisition in connectionist models and 15-20-month-olds.. Developmental Psychology 38:6 ► pp. 1016 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.