Get fulltext from our e-platform
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Okonski, Lacey & Marlene Johansson Falck
2025. The effect of the Embodied Scenes approach to preposition learning with PrepApp. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 12:1  pp. 70 ff. DOI logo
Urios-Aparisi, Eduardo
2025. Experience and film meta­phor. In The Rhetorical Mind [Figurative Thought and Language, 20],  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Falck, Marlene Johansson & Lacey Okonski
Bocian, Edyta
2022. Związki frazeologiczne z komponentem przestrzennym "su" w ujęciu kognitywnym. Próba analizy na materiale języka włoskiego. Acta Neophilologica 2:XXIV  pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
PROOS, MARIANN
2020. Feeling your neighbour: an experimental approach to the polysemy oftundma‘to feel’ in Estonian. Language and Cognition 12:2  pp. 282 ff. DOI logo
SUMAN, LUHACH & TIWARI GARIMA
2020. EXPLORING POLYSEMY THROUGH PROTOTYPICAL THEORY FOR TEACHING LEGAL ENGLISH IN CONTRACTS. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching 10:4  pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Pavlović, Tijana Vesić
2016. Conceptual Metaphors with the Source Domain of Insanity in English and Serbian. Romanian Journal of English Studies 13:1  pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Jamrozik, Anja & Dedre Gentner
2015. Well‐Hidden Regularities: Abstract Uses ofinandonRetain an Aspect of Their Spatial Meaning. Cognitive Science 39:8  pp. 1881 ff. DOI logo
Robinson, Justyna A.
2014. Quantifying polysemy in Cognitive Sociolinguistics. In Corpus Methods for Semantics [Human Cognitive Processing, 43],  pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Tyler, Andrea & Vyvyan Evans
2003. The Semantics of English Prepositions, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue