In:Discourse and Perspective in Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by Wolf-Andreas Liebert, Gisela Redeker and Linda R. Waugh
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 151] 1997
► pp. 205–222
Speech Act Metonymies
Published online: 31 December 1997
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.151.14tho
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.151.14tho
Cited by (31)
Cited by 31 other publications
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2025. Bidirectional changes between modal and conditional in Mandarin. In Semantic-Pragmatic Change from Intersubjective to Textual Meanings [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 353], ► pp. 104 ff.
Barcelona, Antonio
2024. Trends in cognitive-linguistic research on metonymy. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 11:1 ► pp. 51 ff.
Brdar, Mario, Rita Brdar-Szabó & Daler Zayniev
2024. Metonymic layers in proverbs. In Proverbs within Cognitive Linguistics [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 16], ► pp. 40 ff.
Khafaga, Ayman
Tóth, Máté
Tang, Ruiliang
2023. Review of Panther (2022): Introduction to Cognitive Pragmatics. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 10:2 ► pp. 488 ff.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe
BOWERMAN, JOSEPHINE, INGRID LOSSIUS FALKUM & NAUSICAA POUSCOULOUS
Chang, Miao-Hsia & Ún-giân Iûnn
2021. A corpus-based study of directives in Taiwanese Southern Min. Concentric. Studies in Linguistics 47:2 ► pp. 300 ff.
Deppermann, Arnulf & Alexandra Gubina
Komatsubara, Tetsuta
2019. Cognitive principles underlying predicational metonymy. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:2 ► pp. 247 ff.
Ivanová, Martina
Lang, Jun
2018. “I am not criticizing you”. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 9:2 ► pp. 184 ff.
Van Olmen, Daniël & Simone Heinold
2017. Imperatives and directive strategies from a functional-typological perspective. In Imperatives and Directive Strategies [Studies in Language Companion Series, 184], ► pp. 1 ff.
Chen, Wei
Baicchi, Annalisa
2015. Conceptual metaphor in the complex dynamics of illocutionary meaning. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 106 ff.
Baicchi, Annalisa
2017. Chapter 3. How to do things with metonymy in discourse. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 76 ff.
Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó
Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó
2025. Metonymy typologies revisited. In What makes a Figure [Figurative Thought and Language, 19], ► pp. 160 ff.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
2014. Metonymy and the way we speak. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 168 ff.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
2017. The role of inferencing in the interpretation of two expressive speech act constructions. In Constructing families of constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58], ► pp. 109 ff.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
2017. Chapter 1. Exploitingwh-questions for expressive purposes. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 18 ff.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
2019. Figurative reasoning in hedged performatives. In Metaphor and Metonymy in the Digital Age [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 8], ► pp. 175 ff.
De Clerck, Bernard
2013. Review of Takahashi (2012): A cognitive linguistic analysis of the English imperative. With special reference to Japanese imperatives. Functions of Language 20:1 ► pp. 145 ff.
Brdar-Szabó, Rita & Mario Brdar
Brdar-Szabó, Rita & Mario Brdar
2021. Metonymic indeterminacy and metalepsis. In Figurative Language - Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11], ► pp. 175 ff.
Rydning, Antin Fougner
Witczak-Plisiecka, Iwona & Maciej Witek
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Günter Radden
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.