In:A Comparative History of the Literary Draft in Europe
Edited by Olga Beloborodova and Dirk Van Hulle
[Comparative History of Literatures in European Languages XXXV] 2024
► pp. 450–456
Get fulltext
2.2.2Models for genetic criticism
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 8 November 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/chlel.xxxv.31van
https://doi.org/10.1075/chlel.xxxv.31van
Abstract
Genetic critics are faced with what scientists call an inverse problem: starting from the observed
effects (the final work and all the available traces left in the course of the labour of creation), they want to reconstruct the
process that produced these effects. The solution of such problems generally involves the production of models and their
subsequent adjustment to the empirical data. More generally, models are used to provide us with a simplified representation of
reality whenever the data is too rich and the factors involved are too complex to be directly apprehended. In our field, models
can hardly be mathematical formulae governing sets of identified parameters; they are more likely to be analogies that help us to
grasp the peculiar logic that is at work in the creative process. Some of these models are implicit in the work of genetic
critics: it is preferable to make them explicit so as to be conscious of their limitations.
Keywords: genetic criticism, process vs product, modelling, creative writing
Article outline
- A model and its limitations: Manuscripts as film
- Importing models and adjusting them: Diasystem/creolisation/agrammaticality
- Combining models
- The gradualist model: Bergson/Ingarden/Valéry
- Inescapable models
Notes References
References (14)
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1984. Problems
of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, ed. and trans. by Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bellemin-Noël, Jean. 1977. “Reproduire
le manuscrit, présenter les brouillons, établir un
avant-texte.” Littérature 28: 3–18.
Ferrer, Daniel. 2000. “Quelques
remarques sur le couple
énonciation-genèse.” Texte 27/28: 7–23. [URL]
. 2009. “Variant
and Variation: Towards a Freudo-Bathmologico-Bakhtino-Goodmanian Genetic
Model?” In Genetic Criticism and the Creative
Process: Essays from Music, Literature, and Theater, ed.
by J. E. Jones and W. Kinderman, 35–50. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.
Goodman, Nelson. 1988. “Variations
on Variation – or Picasso back to
Bach.” In Reconceptions in Philosophy and
Other Arts and Science, ed. by Nelson Goodman and Catherine Elgin, 66–82. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Ingarden, Roman. 1973. The
Literary Work of Art. An Investigation on the Borderlines of Ontology, Logic and Theory of
Literature. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Joyce, James. 2002. “Finnegans
Wake” Notebooks at Buffalo: VI.B.14, ed. by Vincent Deane, Daniel Ferrer, and Geert Lernout. Turnhout: Brepols.
Segre, Cesare. 1976. “Critique
textuelle, théorie des ensembles et diasystème.” Bulletin de l’Académie
Royale de
Belgique 62: 276–292.
