In:A Comparative History of the Literary Draft in Europe
Edited by Olga Beloborodova and Dirk Van Hulle
[Comparative History of Literatures in European Languages XXXV] 2024
► pp. 365–377
Get fulltext
1.5.3Orthography. <hie>rogueglyphics
Spelling between manuscript and print
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 8 November 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/chlel.xxxv.25sut
https://doi.org/10.1075/chlel.xxxv.25sut
Abstract
When it comes to orthography, there is no straightforward triumph of type technology over manuscript. If
printing brought greater regularisation, it did so over centuries. Until at least 1900, spelling variation signified the
flexibility available within public printed and private handwritten text. Examples in verse and prose from c.1600–1900 suggest how
spelling is bound up with issues of readership and standard usage, on the one hand, and, on the other, of recording those forms
that lie beyond print: dialect, slang, archaisms, phonetic rendering of speech forms, and more. Orthographic irregularity
represents the world as multi-voiced, providing a rhythm for both eye and ear. Authors, publishers, and printers have all used
spelling to censor or enable communication.
References (36)
. 2014. The
Oxford Edition of the Works of Robert
Burns, Vol. 1, ed.
by Nigel Leask. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 1989. The
Early Poems of John Clare: 1804–22, ed. by Eric Robinson, and David Powell. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. 1956–1971. Collected
Letters of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, ed. by Earl Leslie Griggs. 6 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
de Grazia, Margreta, and Peter Stallybrass. 1993. “The
Materiality of the Shakespearean Text.” Shakespeare
Quarterly 44: 255–283.
Dooley, Allan. 1992. Author
and Printer in Victorian
England. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
[Hayward, Abraham.] 1837. “Review
of The Posthumous Papers of the Pickwick
Club.” Quarterly
Review 59: 484–518.
Johnson, Samuel. 1968. Johnson
on Shakespeare, ed. by Arthur Sherbo. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Mugglestone, Lynda. 2006. “English
in the Nineteenth Century.” In The Oxford
History of English, ed. by Lynda Mugglestone, 274–288. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Osselton, N. E. 1998. “Informal
Spelling Systems in Early Modern English:
1500–1800.” In A Reader in Early Modern
English, ed. by Mats Rydén, Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade, and Merja Kytö, 33–45. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
