In:A Comparative History of the Literary Draft in Europe
Edited by Olga Beloborodova and Dirk Van Hulle
[Comparative History of Literatures in European Languages XXXV] 2024
► pp. 353–364
Get fulltext
1.5.2Pruning
Editorial intervention and its effects
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 8 November 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/chlel.xxxv.24gro
https://doi.org/10.1075/chlel.xxxv.24gro
Abstract
Editorial intervention is often essential to a text’s development, and yet the work of literary editors
is often obscured. This chapter examines some of the critical issues around the role of the editor, arguing for the importance of
the editorial process and considering examples of textual development and critical issues resulting from it. Specifically, it
analyses the editing of the ending of Jean Rhys’s Voyage in the Dark to demonstrate the way in which textual
cutting can significantly impact a literary work’s development and reception; these kinds of cuts can echo throughout an author’s
career in surprising ways.
Keywords: pruning, editing, cutting, textual variance, revision, interpretation, reception, Jean Rhys, modernism
Article outline
- Editing: Invisible and essential
- “Starting all over again”: Jean Rhys and the editing of Voyage in the Dark
- Editing, textual variance, and interpretation
- Cutting as theme and echo
Notes References
References (30)
Burgess, Anthony, and John Cullinan. 1973. “Anthony
Burgess, The Art of Fiction No. 48.” Paris
Review 56. [URL]
Carr, Will. 2021. “Did
Anthony Burgess Hate the American Ending of A Clockwork
Orange?” The International Anthony Burgess Foundation
(blog). 4 March
2021. [URL]
Finkelstein, David, and Alistair McCleery. 2019. “Publishing.” In The
Cambridge History of the Book in Britain: Volume 7: The Twentieth Century and
Beyond, ed. by Andrew Nash, Claire Squires, and I. R. Willison, 146–190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Foley, Abram. 2021. The
Editor Function: Literary Publishing in Postwar America. University of Minnesota Press.
Groenland, Tim. 2019. The
Art of Editing: Raymond Carver and David Foster Wallace. New York; London: Bloomsbury Academic.
King, Stephen. 2009. “Raymond
Carver’s Life and Stories.” The New York
Times, 22 November
2009. [URL]
Maslen, Cathleen. 2009. Ferocious
Things: Jean Rhys and the Politics of Women’s
Melancholia. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publisher.
Morris, Mervyn. 1989. “Oh,
Give the Girl a Chance: Jean Rhys and Voyage in the
Dark.” Journal of West Indian
Literature 3 (2): 1–8.
Owen, Katie. 2000. “Introduction.” In Quartet, by Jean Rhys, v–xviii. Penguin
Classics. London: Penguin.
Raine, Craig. 2009. “Raymond
Carver.” Arete
Magazine 29. [URL]
Rhys, Jean. 1979. Smile
Please: An Unfinished Autobiography, ed by Diana Athill. New York: Harper & Row.
. 1990. “Voyage
in the Dark: Part IV (Original
Version).” In The Gender of
Modernism, ed. by Bonnie Kime Scott, 381–89. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Savory, Elaine. 1998. Jean
Rhys. Cambridge Studies in African and Caribbean Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Seshagiri, Urmila. 2006. “Modernist
Ashes, Postcolonial Phoenix: Jean Rhys and the Evolution of the English Novel in the Twentieth
Century.” Modernism/Modernity 13 (3): 487–505.
Sharpe, Leslie T. 1994. Editing
Fact and Fiction: A Concise Guide to Book
Editing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, Helen. 2017. The
Uncommon Reader: A Life of Edward
Garnett. London: Jonathan Cape. Ebook edition.
Spyra, Ania. 2013. “Language
and Belonging in Jean Rhys’s Voyage in the
Dark.” In Rhys Matters: New Critical
Perspectives, ed. by Mary Wilson and Kerry L. Johnson, 67–86. New York ; London: Palgrave Macmillan.
