Cover not available

In:A Comparative History of the Literary Draft in Europe
Edited by Olga Beloborodova and Dirk Van Hulle
[Comparative History of Literatures in European Languages XXXV] 2024
► pp. 202–213

Get fulltext
PDF logo with download linkDownload Chapter PDF

1.2.8
Drafts on the Iberian Peninsula

 | University of Lisbon
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 8 November 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/chlel.xxxv.14dio
Abstract
Previously unobserved in a global view, drafts belonging to Iberian literary and cultural traditions are here exploratorily approached in accordance with a wide sense of the term “draft”. The chapter is divided into four sections: following some preliminary remarks, several desiderata for a future history of drafts in the Iberian Peninsula are presented; the second section reflects upon the coincidence (or lack thereof) between intellectual property and scribal agency in the composition of drafts; the third is focused on the morphology and function of blank spaces in genetic materials; the conclusion discusses, and contests, the idea of the draft as an unsuitable transcription, arguing in turn for its status as a site where fluid authorial goals are enacted.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • A future history
  • Hand matters
  • Blank spaces
  • Conclusion: In mentis
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (41)
References
Bautista, Francisco. 2014. “La segunda parte de la Crónica de Juan II: borradores y texto definitivo.” Cahiers d’études hispaniques médiévales 37: 105–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Binotti, Lucia. 1992. “La teoría del ‘castellano primitivo’: el método comparativo a partir de un mito.” Romance Notes 32 (3): 221–230.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blasco, Javier. 2011. Poética de la escritura. El taller del poeta. Ensayo de crítica genética (Juan Ramón Jiménez, Francisco Pino y Claudio Rodríguez). Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boadas, Sònia. 2020. “Techniques and Instruments for Studying the Autograph Manuscripts of Lope de Vega.” Hipogrifo 8 (2): 509–531. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bouza, Fernando. 2001. Corre manuscrito. Una historia cultural del Siglo de Oro. Madrid: Marcial Pons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Castro, Ivo. 2013. Editar Pessoa. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional – Casa da Moeda.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Closa Farrés, José. 1991. “De ratione punctandi. Observaciones sobre la puntuación antigua y moderna.” In Colectánea Paleográfica de la Corona de Aragón, ed. by Josefina Mateu Ibars, and María Dolores Mateu Ibars, 107–144. Barcelona: Universidad.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel T. 1816. Christabel; Kubla Khan, a vision; The pains of sleep. Oxford: H. Didier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Biasi, Pierre Marc. 1996. “What is a Literary Draft? Toward a Functional Typology of Genetic Documentation.” Yale French Studies 89: 26–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Defenu, Carlotta. 2022. Génese e reescrita da poesia ortónima de Fernando Pessoa. Lisboa: Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa (PhD thesis).
DGBNP. 2008. Informação n.º 37. Lisboa: Biblioteca Nacional de Portugal. [URL]
Duarte, Luiz Fagundes. 1994. Álbum de autógrafos de escritores portugueses. Lisboa: Associação Portuguesa de Escritores.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duarte, Luiz Fagundes, and António Braz de Oliveira (eds.). 2007. As mãos da escrita. 25.º aniversário do Arquivo de Cultura Portuguesa Contemporânea. Lisboa: Biblioteca Nacional de Portugal.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elia, Paola (ed.). 1991. Gli scritti autografi di Juan de la Cruz. L’Aquila: Japadre.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Problemas textuales de las obras de San Juan de la Cruz: El Cántico B. Alicante: Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes. [URL]
Erhard, K., F. Kessler, N. Neumann, H.-J. Ortheil and M. Lotze. 2014. “Professional training in creative writing is associated with enhanced fronto-striatal activity in a literary text continuation task.” NeuroImage 100: 15–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández-Ordóñez, Inés. 2009. “Manuscritos historiográficos ‘de autor’.” In Los códices literários de la Edad Media. Interpretación, historia, técnicas y catalogación, coord. by Pedro M. Cátedra, ed. by Eva Belén Carro Carbajal and Javier Durán Barceló, 91–125. Salamanca: Cilengua – Instituto de Historia del Libro y de la Lectura.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferrer, Daniel. 2011. Logiques du brouillon. Modèles pour une critique génétique. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcia, Michel. 2005. “Una nueva versión de la Crónica de Enrique III, de Ayala.” Romance Philology 58 (2): 225–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garrett, Almeida. 1844. Frei Luiz de Sousa. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gimeno Blay, Francisco M. 2007. “Entre el autor y el lector. Produxir libros manuscritos en catalán (siglos XII-XV).” Anuario de estudios medievales 37 (1): 305–366. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goody, Jack. 2000. The Power of the Written Tradition. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grésillon, Almuth. 2002. “Langage de l’ébauche: parole intérieure extériorisée.” Langages 147: 19–38.
Hay, Louis. 1994. “La escritura viva.” Revista de Filología XXVII (I–II): 5–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jauralde Pou, Pablo (coord.). 2008–2015. Biblioteca de Autógrafos Españoles, I–IV, Madrid: Calambur.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martínez Comeche, Juan Antonio. 1995. “Aplicación de la metodología paleográfica a un autógrafo lopiano del siglo XVII.” Revista general de información y documentación 5 (2): 11–38.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martínez Deyros, María. 2018. “La crítica genética y el mito literario de la obra en marcha.” Ínsula 861: 3–6.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miranda, Francisco de Sá de. [1885] 1989. Poesias, ed. by Carolina Michaëlis de Vasconcellos. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional – Casa da Moeda.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morrás, María (ed.). 1996. Alonso de Cartagena. Libros de Tulio: De Senetute, De los Ofiçios. Alcalá de Henares – Madrid: Universidad de Alcalá de Henares.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nobre, António. 1983. Alicerces seguido de Livros de Apontamentos, ed. by Mário Cláudio. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional-Casa da Moeda.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patrício, Rita. 2012. Episódios. Da teorização estética em Fernando Pessoa. Vila Nova de Famalicão: Húmus – Centro de Estudos Humanísticos, Universidade do Minho.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pessoa, Fernando. 1998. Cartas entre Fernando Pessoa e os directores da presença, ed. by Enrico Martines. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional-Casa da Moeda.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reis, Carlos. 1997. “Desastre literário: sobre a publicação d’O crime do Padre Amaro.” Semear 1: 1. [URL]
Robinson, Douglas. 1997. Western Translation Theory from Herodotus to Nietzsche. Manchester: St Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Segre, Cesare. 1999. Introdução à análise do texto literário, trans. Isabel Teresa Santos. Lisboa: Estampa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spitzer, Leo. 1960. “Adiciones a ‘Camino del poema (Confianza de Pedro Salinas)’.” Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 14 (3/4): 333–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stokes, Peter. 2009. “Computer-Aided Palaeography, Present and Future.” In Kodikologie und Paläographie im digitalen Zeitalter – Codicology and Palaeography in the Digital Age), ed. by Malte Rehbein, Patrick Sahle, and Torsten Schaßan, 309–338. Norderstedt: BoD.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vasconcellos, Carolina Michaëlis de. 1911. Novos estudos sobre Sá de Miranda. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vauthier, Bénédicte. 2014. “Tanteos, calas y pesquisas en el dossier genético digital de El Dorado de Robert Juan Cantavella.” In Nueva narrativa española, ed. by Marco Kunz and Sonia Gómez Rodríguez, 311–345. Barcelona: Linkgua.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vieira, Padre António. 2008. Representação perante o Tribunal do Santo Ofício, 2 vols., ed. by Ana Paula Banza. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional – Casa da Moeda.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeller, Hans. 1975. “A new approach to the critical constitution of literary texts.” Studies in Bibliography 28: 231–264.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue