Cover not available

In:A Comparative History of the Literary Draft in Europe
Edited by Olga Beloborodova and Dirk Van Hulle
[Comparative History of Literatures in European Languages XXXV] 2024
► pp. 127–140

Get fulltext
PDF logo with download linkDownload Chapter PDF

1.2.3
Eastern European traditions

Czech, Hungarian, Polish, Slovak, and Ukrainian literary drafts

 | Jagiellonian University
 | Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Czech Literature
 | Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Czech Literature
 | Institute of Literary Studies, Research Centre for Humanities | HUN-REN
 | Institute of Slovak Literature SAS.
 | University of Alberta
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 8 November 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/chlel.xxxv.09ant
Abstract
This chapter refers to literature in five languages: Czech, Hungarian, Polish, Slovak and Ukrainian. Firstly, it presents the histories of Eastern European literary drafts. In this section answers to the following questions are delivered: from what time do the oldest surviving rough drafts date? How did the culture of archiving evolve? What impact did historical events have on the state of preservation of the documents? The focus then shifts to the issue of the genetic approach in Eastern European scholarship. The aim of this section is to discuss how creative writing processes were dealt with by different philological traditions. Finally, East European reception of critique génétique is presented.
Article outline
  • Introduction: Defining “Eastern European tradition”
  • Eastern European histories of the rough draft – in a nutshell
  • Genetic approach in Eastern European textual scholarship: Beginnings and development
  • External inspirations and their internalisation: Critique génétique in the Eastern European nexus
  • Today and tomorrow: Eastern European genetic criticism as work in progress
  • Notes
  • References
References (38)
References
Aizenshtok, Iieremiia. 1922. “Izuchenie novoi ukrainskoi literatury (Zametki)” [Studies of new Ukrainian literature: Notes]. Put’ Prosveshcheniia 6: 135–162.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bezruč, Petr. 2015. Slezské písně [Silesian Songs]. Prague: Institute of Czech Literature – Akropolis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borodin, Vasyl’. 2010. “Dynamika tvorchoho protsesu Shevchenka-poeta” [Dynamics of creative process in Shevchenko’s poetry]. Slovo i Chas 3: 3–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buda, Attila, and Ágnes Major. 2019. “A Babits-versek kritikai kiadásának átalakulása, avagy a kéziratos hagyaték változásának következményei” [Changes in the critical editions of the Babits poems, or the consequences of transformations in the manuscript legacy]. Irodalomtörténet 100 (4): 435–447.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Červenka, Miroslav. 1971. “Textologie und Semiotik.” In Texte und Varianten. Probleme ihrer Edition und Interpretation, ed. by Gunter Martens and Hans Zeller, 143–63. München: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. “Textual Criticism and Semiotics.” In Contemporary German Editorial Theory, ed. by H. W. Gabler, G. Bornstein, and G. B. Pierce, 59–77. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Debreczeni, Attila. 2012. Csokonai költői életművének kronológiai rendje [The chronological order of Csokonai’s poetic oeuvre]. Csokonai Vitéz Mihály összes művei. Budapest-Debrecen: Akadémiai Kiadó-Debreceni Egyetemi Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dmitrieva, Ekaterina (ed.). 1999. Geneticheskaia kritika vo Frantsii [Genetic criticism in France]. Moscow: OGI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fylypovych, Pavlo. 1926. “Heneza dramatychnoї poemy Lesi Ukraïnky U pushchi” [Genesis of Lesia Ukraïnka’s dramatic poem In the Forest]. In Lesia Ukraïnka, Tvory, vol. 9, 7–27. [Кyiv]: Knyhospilka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gellner, František. 2012. Dílo [The Complete Writings]. Prague: Institute of Czech Literature – Akropolis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grésillon, Almuth. 1997. “Slow: Work in progress.” Word & Image 13 (2): 106–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haleta, Olena. 2021. “Poet na druhomu berezi: protsesual’nist’ pys’ma u prozi Bohdana Ihoria Antonycha” [Poet on the other side: writing as a process in Bohdan Ihor Antonych’s prose]. Slovo i Chas 1: 56–71.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hay, Louis, and Péter Nagy. 1982. Avant-texte, texte, après-texte. Colloque International de Textologie à Mátrafüred (Hongrie), 13–16 October 1978. Budapest-Paris: Akadémiai Kiadó-Éditions du CNRS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hnatiuk, Myroslava. 2011. Tekstolohichni studii [Textological studies]. Kyiv: VPK Ekspres-Polihraf.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jedličková, Alice, and Dana Svobodová. 1989. “Jak v napsaném objevovat psaní” [To find writing in the written]. Literární Měsíčník 18 (10): 156–8.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kelevéz, Ágnes. 1998. A keletkező szöveg esztétikája. genetikai közelítés Babits költészetéhez [The aesthetics of a nascent text. A genetic approach to Babits’s poetry]. Budapest: Argumentum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kolodkevych, Halyna. 2015. Variatyvnist’ khudozhnioho myslennia Vasylia Stusa [Variability of Vasyl’ Stus’s artistic mindset]. Kyiv: Kyiivs’kyi Mizhnarodnyi Universytet.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krausová, Nora. 1973. “Textológia a poetica” [Textology and Poetics]. Slovenská Literatúra 20 (3): 132–143.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1974. “Literárny text ako proces produkcie” [The Literary Text as a Production Process]. Slovenská Literatúra 21 (2): 178–190.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leociak, Jacek. 2004. Text in the Face of Destruction: Accounts from the Warsaw Ghetto Reconsidered. Warsaw: ŻIH.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mináriková, Marianna. 1972. Textologické a štylistické problémy Kukučínovho diela [Textological and stylistic problems of Kukučín’s work]. Bratislava: Vydavateľstvo Slovenskej Akadémie Vied.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miroshnychenko, Larysa. 2001. Nad rukopysamy Lesi Ukraïnky: Narysy z psykholohiї tvorchosti i tekstolohiї [On Lesia Ukraïnka’s manuscripts: Essays on the psychology of creativity and textology]. Kyiv: Instytut Literatury im T. H. Shevchenka NANU.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. “Rukopys iak metod vyvchennia psykholohiї tvorchosti [Manuscript as a method for studies on the psychology of creativity].” Materialy p’’iatoho Mizhnarodnoho Konhresu Ukraїnistiv. Literaturoznavstvo, vol. 1, ed. by Oleksa Myshanych, 72–73. Chernivtsi: Ruta.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Lesia Ukraïnka. Zhyttia i teksty [Lesia Ukraïnka, Her life and texts]. Kyiv: Smoloskyp.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitosek, Zofia. 2004. Teorie badań literackich [The theories of literary scholarship]. Warsaw: PWN.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan. 1968. “Varianten und Stilistik.” Poetica 2 (3): 399–403. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pigoń, Stanisław. 1967. Formowanie “Dziadów” części II: rekonstrukcja genetyczna [The Forefathers’ Eve, part II – the process of text-making, genetic reconstruction]. Warsaw: PIW.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Portal Shevchenka [The Shevchenko portal]. [URL]
Shallcross, Bożena. 2011. The Holocaust Object in Polish and Polish-Jewish Culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sichálek, Jakub. 2018. “Editologická problematika staročeské literatury” [Scholarly Editing in the Context of Old Czech Literature]. In Editologie: Od náčrtu ke knize, ed. by Michal Kosák and Jiří Flaišman, 219–62. Prague: Institute of Czech Literature.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Syvachenko, Mykola. 1974. Literaturoznavchi ta fol’klorystychni rozvidky [Literary and folklore studies]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szénási, Zoltán. 2018. “Teória és praxis. A szövegkiadás elmélete és gyakorlata Magyarországon – az elmúlt harminc év” [Theory and practice. Theory and practice of text publishing in Hungary – the last thirty years]. Irodalomtörténet 99 (4): 337–359.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szilágyi, Márton. 2017. Forrásérték és poétika. Kazinczy Ferenc: Fogságom naplója [Source value and poetics. Ferenc Kazinczy: Diary of my captivity]. Budapest: reciti.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Troszyński, Marek. 2017. Alchemia rękopisu. “Samuel Zborowski” Juliusza Słowackiego [The alchemy of the manuscript. “Samuel Zborowski” by Juliusz Słowacki]. Warsaw: IBL PAN.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vašák, Pavel. 1979. “Dědictví klasiků a textologie” [Heritage of classics and textology]. Tvorba 3: 14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Veres, András. 2004. “Az Édes Anna kritikai kiadásáról” [On the critical edition of Anna Édes]. Irodalomtörténet 85 (3): 394–401.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zelenka, Miloš. 1995. “Genetická kritika a literární dějiny” [Genetic criticism and literary history]. Slavia 66 (2): 197–201.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zubkov, Serhii (ed.). 1968. Pytannia tekstolohii [Issues of textology], vol. 1. Kyiv: Naukova dumka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue