In:A Comparative History of the Literary Draft in Europe
Edited by Olga Beloborodova and Dirk Van Hulle
[Comparative History of Literatures in European Languages XXXV] 2024
► pp. 87–98
Get fulltext
1.1.6The twenty-first century
From paper notebooks to keystroke logging
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 8 November 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/chlel.xxxv.06bek
https://doi.org/10.1075/chlel.xxxv.06bek
Abstract
In the twenty-first century, the digital medium has become an indispensable part of the literary writing
process and can hardly be neglected in the study of the literary draft from this – yet very recent – millennium. In this chapter,
we examine four manifestations of the twenty-first century literary draft on a spectrum ranging from fully analogue to fully
digital: the paper draft of Ian McEwan’s Atonement, the self-archived digital draft of Bart Moeyaert’s
Het paradijs, the hybrid draft of Gie Bogaert’s Roosevelt, and the keystroke logging draft of
David Troch’s story “Mondini”. These types of drafts offer their respective levels of granularity to examine the writing process,
and especially the latter type of draft presents us with a hitherto unprecedented degree of detail, opening up the document’s
nanogenesis.
Article outline
- Introduction
- The paper draft: Ian McEwan’s Atonement
- The self-archived digital draft: Bart Moeyaert’s Het paradijs
- The hybrid draft: Gie Bogaert’s Roosevelt
- The keystroke logging draft: “Mondini” by David Troch
- Conclusion: Levels of granularity
Notes References
References (17)
Bekius, Lamyk. 2021. “The
Reconstruction of the Author’s Movement Through the Text, or How to Encode Keystroke Logged Writing
Processes in
TEI–XML.” Variants 15–16: 3–43.
Crombez, Thomas, and Edith Cassiers. 2017. “Postdramatic
Methods of Adaptation in the Age of Digital Collaborative
Writing.” Digital Scholarship in the
Humanities 23 (1): 17–35.
Ghonem-Woets, Karen. 2012. “‘Het
komt er in het hele leven op neer dat mensen gezien willen worden’: Een interview met Bart
Moeyaert.” Literatuur Zonder
Leeftijd 26 (87): 85–101.
Lindgren, Eva, Asbjørg Westum, Hanna Outakoski, and Kirk P. H. Sullivan. 2019. “Revising
at the Leading Edge: Shaping Ideas or Clearing up
Noise.” In Observing Writing. Insights from
Keystroke Logging and Handwriting, ed. by Eva Lindgren, Kirk P. H. Sullivan, Raquel Fidalgo, and Thierry Olive, 346–365. Studies
in
Writing. Leiden: Brill.
Mathijsen, Marita. 2009. “Genetic
Textual Editing: The End of an Era.” In Was
ist Textkritik? Zur Geschichte und Relevanz eines Zentralbegriffs der
Editionswissenschaft, ed. by Gertraud Mitterauer, Werner Maria Bauer, and Sabine Hofer. Bd. 28. Beihefte
zu
Editio. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Ries, Thorsten. 2018. “The
Rationale of the Born-Digital Dossier Génétique: Digital Forensics and the Writing Process with
Examples from the Thomas Kling Archive.” Digital Scholarship in the
Humanities 33 (2): 391–424.
. 2021. “Dynamic
Facsimiles: Note on the Transcription of Born-Digital Works for Genetic
Criticism.” Variants 15–16: 233–243.
