In:Landscapes of Realism: Rethinking literary realism in comparative perspectives
Edited by Dirk Göttsche, Rosa Mucignat and Robert Weninger
[Comparative History of Literatures in European Languages XXXII] 2021
► pp. 775–792
Biographical fiction’s challenge to realism
Patricia Duncker’s Sophie and the Sibyl and Alicia Giménez Bartlett’s Una habitación ajena
Published online: 21 April 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/chlel.xxxii.30bol
https://doi.org/10.1075/chlel.xxxii.30bol
Abstract
Starting from a brief discussion of biographical fiction and
the challenges it poses to realism, this case study compares Patricia Duncker’s
Sophie and the Sibyl (2015), centered on George Eliot alongside
various real and fictional characters (some of whom drawn from Eliot’s own fiction),
and Alicia Giménez Bartlett’s Una habitación ajena (1997), focused
on the (fictional) diary of Virginia Woolf’s cook Nellie Boxall and on the
relationships between the writer and her domestic servants. This study considers the
texts’ complex narrative structures, the reliability or otherwise of their narrators
and the hypocrisy or otherwise of the historical protagonists, and, crucially, the
critique of their authors’ discussions of realism in their respective ‘manifestos’
(in particular Chapter 17 of Eliot’s Adam Bede and Woolf’s “Mr
Bennett and Mrs Brown”). In their investigation of the gaps between theory and
practice, between present and past, between authorial, narrative and historical
subjectivity, and between conceptions of how reality can and should be represented,
the novels seek not so much to give us historically believable contexts and
individuals, as, rather, to explore the distances and continuities between the
intellectual, literary and ethical premises that shape our constantly transforming
understanding of these concepts.
Article outline
- 1.Patricia Duncker’s Sophie and the Sibyl
- 2.Alicia Giménez Bartlett’s Una habitación ajena
- 3.Traveling between realities
- 4.Conclusion: The permanent transformations of realism
Notes Works cited
References (29)
Banville, John. 1979. “Novelists
on the Novel: Ronan Sheehan Talks to John Banville and Francis
Stuart.” The Crane
Bag 3.2: 76–84.
Barrett, Michèle. 1978. “Towards
a Virginia Woolf Criticism.” The Sociological
Review 26.1 (supplement): 145–60.
. 1993. “Wave
Theory and the Rise of Literary
Modernism.” In Realism
and Representation: Essays on the Problem of Realism in Relation to Science,
Literature and Culture, edited
by George Levine, 193–213. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Binet, Laurent. 2019. “Reflections
on Truth, Veracity, Fictionalization and Falsification. Laurent Binet,
Interviewed by Monica
Latham.” In Conversations
with Biographical Novelists: Truthful Fictions across the
Globe, edited by Michael Lackey, 33–48. New York: Bloomsbury.
Boldrini, Lucia. 2009. “Anna
Banti and Virginia Woolf: A Grammar of
Responsibility.” Journal of Anglo-Italian
Studies 10: 135–49.
Gallagher, Catherine. 2005. “George
Eliot: Immanent
Victorian.” Representations 90.1 (Spring): 61–74.
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1996. The
Structure of Scientific Revolutions, third
edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lackey, Michael. 2019. “Introduction:
The Agency Aesthetics of Biofiction in the Age of Postmodern
Confusion.” In Conversations
with Biographical Novelists: Truthful Fictions across the
Globe, edited by Michael Lackey, 1–21. New York: Bloomsbury.
Lessing, Doris. 2003. “Sketches
from Bohemia.” The
Guardian, 14 June. Accessed 30 August 2019. [URL]
Marcus, Jane. 2004. Hearts
of Darkness: White Women Write Race. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Montero, Rosa. 2019. “Speculative
Subjectivities and the Biofictional Surge. Rosa Montero, Interviewed by Virginia
Rademacher.” In Conversations
with Biographical Novelists: Truthful Fictions across the
Globe, edited by Michael Lackey, 157–68. New York: Bloomsbury.
Wilson, Mary. 2013. The
Labors of Modernism: Domesticity, Servants, and Authorship in Modernist
Fiction. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
