Cover not available

Article published In: Constructions and Frames
Vol. 9:1 (2017) ► pp.70–100

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The polysemy network of Chinese ‘one’-phrases in a diachronic constructional perspective

 | University of California, Berkeley
Published online: 20 October 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.9.1.03che
Abstract
This study investigates the development of a polysemy network within a constructional framework. The synchronic variation of Chinese ‘one’-phrases is explained by diachronic developments. The results of a quantitative corpus analysis show that each of the senses of the ‘one’ phrase tends to occur in specific syntactic constructions due to inheritance from extant constructions. The results contribute to explaining the formation of a diachronic polysemy network by investigating the hierarchical structure of its constructions, thus allowing a deeper understanding of how semantic extensions have been formed through gradual constructional association.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Synchronic polysemy
  • 3.Diachronic construction-based changes
    • 3.1 Dian ‘dot’ in Old Chinese and Middle Chinese: counting and measuring
    • 3.2The ‘one’-phrase in Early Mandarin
      • 3.2.1The development of the PPI sense of ‘one’-phrases in Early Mandarin Chinese
      • 3.2.2The development of the NPI sense of ‘one’-phrases in Early Mandarin Chinese
        • 3.2.2.1The minimizer sense in preverbal position
        • 3.2.2.2The minimizer sense in the postverbal position
      • 3.2.3Category expansion: Adverbials
  • 4.Expansion of the polysemous network across periods
    • 4.1A constructional perspective on diachronic changes
    • 4.2Diachronic association of the ‘one’-phrase with extant constructions
    • 4.3Directionality in productivity, schematicity, and compositionality
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (39)
References
Baker, C. L. (1970). Double negatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 11, 169–186.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L. (2007). Frequency of use and the organization of language. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chao, Y. -R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, G. G. (2000). Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, A. D. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (1975). Pragmatic scales and logical structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 61, 353–375.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Francis, E. J., & Michaelis, L. A. (2003). Mismatch: A crucible for linguistic theory. In E. J. Francis & L. A. Mchaelis (Eds.), Mismatch: Form-function incongruity and the architecture of grammar (pp.1–27). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fried, M. (2008). Constructions and constructs: Mapping a diachronic process. In A. Bergs & G. Diewald (Eds.), Constructions and language changes (pp.47–79). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gebhardt, L. (2009). Numeral classifiers and the structure of DP. Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giannakidou, A. (2011). Positive polarity items and negative polarity items: Variation, licensing, and compositionality. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning (pp.1660–1712). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, A., & Campbell, L. (1995). Historical syntax in cross-linguistics perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, B. (1997). Cognitive foundations of grammar. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2nd revised ed. Original edition 1993. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horn, L. R. (1989). A natural history of negation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, C. -T. J. (1987). Existential sentences in Chinese and (in)definiteness. In E. J. Reuland & A. G. B. ter Meulen (Eds.), The representation of (in)definiteness (pp.226–253). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hsiao, S. -Y. (2002). Negative sensitivity in Chinese: A comparative study of Mandarin Chinese and Holo Taiwanese. Ph.D. Dissertation, National Tsing Hua University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, C. -T. J., Li, Y. -H. A., & Li, Y. (2009). Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Israel, M. (2011). The grammar of polarity: Pragmatics, sensitivity and the logic of scales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1909[1949]). A modern English grammar on historical principles. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (2011). Grammaticalization and cognitive grammar. In H. Narrog & B. Heine (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization (pp. 79–91). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, S. (1965). Wei Jin Nanbei Chao liangci yanjiu [A study of classifiers of the Wei Jin and Northern and Southern Dynasties]. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lü, S. (1985). Jindai hanyu zhidaici [The pronouns of vernacular Chinese]. Shanghsi: Xuelin chubanshe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norman, J. (1988). Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Packard, J. L. (2000). The morphology of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paul, W. 2015. Adverbs. In R. Sybesma (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics. Consulted online on 31 October 2016 < >.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peyraube, A. (1996). Recent issues in Chinese historical syntax. In C. -T. J. Huang & Y. -H. A. Li (Eds.), New horizons in Chinese linguistics (pp.161–213). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Progovac, L. (2005). Negative and positive feature checking and the distribution of polarity items. In S. Brown and A. Przepiórkowski (Eds.), Negation in Slavic (pp.179–217). Bloomington, Indiana: Slavica Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, A. (2004). Positive polarity – negative polarity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 221, 409–452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, A., Whang, J., & Zu, V. (2014). Quantifier words and their multi-functional(?) parts. Language and Linguistics, 15(1), 115–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsai, W- T. Dylan. (2004). On formal semantics of zhi and lian in Chinese. Zhougguo Yuwen [Chinese Language], 21, 99–111.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wei, P. -C. (2000). Donghan wei jin nan bei chao zai yufashi shang de diwei [The position of the Eastern Han and Six Dynasties in the history of Chinese grammar]. Hanxue Yanjiu [Chinese Studies], 11, 199–230.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Shanggu han yu dao zhonggu hanyu yufa de zhongyao fazhan [The important developments of grammar from Old Chinese to Middle Chinese]. Di san jie guoji hanxue huiyi lunwenji [Proceeding of the third international symposium of Chinese studies], 75–106. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xiang, M. (2008). Plurality, maximality and scalar inferences: A case study of Mandarin dou . Journal of East Asian Linguist, 171, 227–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, N. (2000). Object shift in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 28(2), 201–246.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Classifier structures in Mandarin Chinese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Th. Gries, Stefan
2025. Corpus Linguistics and the Cognitive/Constructional Endeavor. In The Cambridge Handbook of Construction Grammar, ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2020. Reinforcement by realignment in diachronic construction grammar. Constructions and Frames 12:2 ► pp. 206 ff. DOI logo
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2021. Morphosyntactic vagueness and directionality. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 9:1 ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
KUO, YUEH HSIN
2024. Bidirectional grammaticalization: Chinese modal and conditional. Journal of Linguistics 60:2 ► pp. 363 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue