Cover not available

Article published In: Modal Meaning in Construction Grammar
Edited by Bert Cappelle and Ilse Depraetere
[Constructions and Frames 8:1] 2016
► pp. 1–6

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Modal meaning in Construction Grammar

Published online: 29 September 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.8.1.01cap
References (21)
Bergs, A. (2010). Expression of futurity in contemporary English: A Construction Grammar perspective. English Language and Linguistics, 14(2), 217–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boogaart, R. (2009). Semantics and pragmatics in construction grammar: The case of modal verbs. In A. Bergs & G. Diewald (Eds.), Contexts and constructions (pp. 213–241). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boogaart, R., & Fortuin, E. ( 2016). Modality and mood in cognitive linguistics and construction grammars. In J. Nuyts & J. Van der Auwera (Eds.), Oxford handbook of modality and mood (pp. 514–533). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cappelle, B., & Depraetere, I. (2013). Modal verbs from a Construction Grammar perspective. Fifth International AFLiCo Conference, Empirical approaches to multi-modality and to language variation , Université Lille 3, Villeneuve d’Ascq, France, 15-17 May 2013.
Cappelle, B., & De Sutter, G. (2010). Should vs. ought to: A corpus-based multivariate analysis. Sixth International Conference on Construction Grammar (ICCG-6) , Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic, 3-5 September 2010.
De Haan, F. (2012). The relevance of constructions for the interpretation of modal meaning: The case of must . English Studies, 93(6), 700–728. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diewald, G. (2006). Context types in grammaticalization as constructions. Constructions, SV1(9).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diewald, G., & Smirnova, E. (Eds.). (2011a). Modalität und Evidentialität. Fokus 37. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011b). The German evidential constructions and their origins. A corpus based analysis. In T. Mortelmans, J. Mortelmans, & W. De Mulder (Eds.), In the mood for mood (pp. 81–100). Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi (Cahiers Chronos 23). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A., & Van der Auwera, J. (2012). This is to count as a construction. Folia Linguistica, 461, 109–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013a). Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word formation and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013b). Die englischen Modalverben im Daumenkino: Zur dynamischen Visualisierung von Phänomenen des Sprachwandels. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 421, 67–82.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morgan, J.L. (1977). Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. Technical report No. 52. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. [URL].
Mortelmans, T. (2000). Konjunktiv II and epistemic modals in German: A division of labour. In A. Foolen & F. van der Leek (Eds.), Constructions in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 191–215). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Narrog, H. (2012). Modality, subjectivity, and semantic change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. (2003). A construction-based approach to indirect speech acts. In K.-U. Panther & L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing (pp.105–126). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van der Auwera, J., & Plungian, V. (1998). Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology, 21, 79–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wärnsby, A. (2002). Modal constructions? Lund Working Papers in Linguistics, 21. Lund: Department of English Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Basile, Carmelo Alessandro, Agnès Celle & Cameron Morin
2025. Cognitive approaches to variation and change in the English modal domain: introduction. English Language and Linguistics 29:3 ► pp. 444 ff. DOI logo
Ungerer, Tobias & Stefan Hartmann
2023. Constructionist Approaches, DOI logo
FLACH, SUSANNE
2021. Beyond modal idioms and modal harmony: a corpus-based analysis of gradient idiomaticity inmod+advcollocations. English Language and Linguistics 25:4 ► pp. 743 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue