Article published In: Constructions and Frames
Vol. 4:1 (2012) ► pp.1–23
Re-thinking FNI
On null instantiation and control in Construction Grammar
Published online: 3 September 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.4.1.01lyn
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.4.1.01lyn
This paper discusses the classification of null instantiation phenomena in Construction Grammar and proposes a different treatment of so-called free null instantiation (FNI). Based on e.g. control data, different types of alleged FNI are shown to be more accurately classified as definite (adjunct control), generic (e.g. tough constructions), or unspecified for interpretation (e.g. passives). A striking pattern is that general constructions, such as infinitives and gerunds, license unspecified null instantiation (simply NI), whereas more specific control constructions are associated with a definite (DNI) or generic (GNI) interpretation. Hence, the paper proposes a null instantiation taxonomy that distinguishes (unspecified) NI and the specific subtypes definite (DNI), indefinite (INI), identity of sense (ISNA), and generic (GNI) null instantiation.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Buskin, Vladimir
Boas, Hans C.
Croft, William & Meagan Vigus
Boas, Hans C. & Steffen Höder
2018. Construction Grammar and language contact. In Constructions in Contact [Constructional Approaches to Language, 24], ► pp. 5 ff.
Höder, Steffen
2018. Grammar is community-specific. In Constructions in Contact [Constructional Approaches to Language, 24], ► pp. 37 ff.
Boas, Hans C. & Ryan Dux
Cennamo, Michela
2017. Object omission and the semantics of predicates in Italian in a comparative perspective. In Contrastive Studies in Verbal Valency [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 237], ► pp. 252 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
