Cover not available

Introduction published In: Quo Vadis, Construction Grammar?
Edited by Hans C. Boas, Jaakko Leino and Benjamin Lyngfelt
[Constructions and Frames 16:2] 2024
► pp. 169–190

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
Introduction

Constructionist views on Construction Grammar

 | University of Texas at Austin
 | University of Helsinki
ORCiD logo with link | University of Gothenburg
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with University of Gothenburg.

Published online: 15 August 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.24005.boa
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.C×G in the eyes of the community
    • 2.1Emergent views – a quantitative illustration
    • 2.2Themes and reflections – a qualitative illustration
    • 2.3Themes from the roundtable discussion at ICCG11 in Antwerp
  • 3.Construction grammar as a framework
  • 4.The papers in this theme issue
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (46)
References
Anthoniessen, L. (2020). Special passives across the lifespan. Cognitive and social mechanisms [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Antwerp/LMU Munich.
Boas, H. C., & Sag, I. A. (Eds.) (2012). Sign-based Construction Grammar. CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boas, H. C., & Ziem, A. (2022). Debunking some myths about the role and relevance of (restricted) semantic role sets: Some thoughts on Ágel & Höllein 2021. In F. Gallez & M. Hermann (Eds.), Cognition and contrast. Festschrift for Sabine De Knop (pp. 65–96). Saint-Louis University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Busso, L. (2018). Coercing Italian: Psycholinguistic investigations on valency coercion in Italian [Doctoral dissertation]. Pisa University.
Butler, C. S., & Gonzálvez-García, F. (2014). Exploring functional-cognitive space. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). Morphosyntax. Constructions of the world’s languages. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2024). Philosophical reflections on the future of construction grammar (or, confessions of a Radical Construction Grammarian). Constructions and Frames, 16(2).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Desagulier, G. (2022). Changes in the midst of a construction network: A diachronic construction grammar approach to complex prepositions denoting internal location. Cognitive Linguistics, 33(2), 339–386. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diessel, H. (2019). The grammar network. How linguistic structure is shaped by language use. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2023). The constructicon. Taxonomies and networks. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Frame Semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–38). Hanshin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1985). Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 6(2), 222–254.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1988). The mechanisms of “Construction Grammar”. The Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 141, 35–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Inversion and constructional inheritance. In G. Webelhuth, J.-P. Koenig & A. Kathol (Eds.), Lexical and constructional aspects of linguistic explanation (pp. 113–128). CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Berkeley Construction Grammar. In Th. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 111–132). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., & Kay, P. (1995). Construction grammar coursebook [Unpublished manuscript]. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fried, M., & Nikiforidou, K. (Eds.) (in press). The Cambridge handbook of construction grammar. Cambridge University Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Constructionist approaches. In Th. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 14–31). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2024). Usage-based constructionist approaches and large language models. Constructions and Frames, 16(2). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. T. (2022). On, or, against?, (just) frequency? In H. C. Boas (Ed.), Directions for Pedagogical Construction Grammar. Learning and teaching (with) constructions (pp. 47–72). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haider, H. (2018). Grammatiktheorien im Vintage-Look – viel Ideologie, wenig Ertrag. In A. Wöllstein, P. Gallmann, M. Habermann & M. Krifka (Eds.), Grammatiktheorie und Empirie in der germanistischen Linguistik (pp. 47–92). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(in press). Frequency: Psychological and methodological considerations. In M. Fried & K. Nikiforidou (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of construction grammar. Cambridge University Press.
Hoffmann, T. (2022). Construction grammar. The structure of English. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, T., & Trousdale, G. (Eds.) (2013). The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kay, P., & Fillmore, C. J. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What’s X Doing Y? Construction. Language, 75(1), 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, J.-B., & Michaelis, L. A. (2022). Syntactic constructions in English. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1990). The Invariance Hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 39–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. (2000). A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 1–63). CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leiss, E. (2009). Konstruktionsgrammatik versus Universalgrammatik. In E. Wieland & F. Schmöe (Eds.), Wie wir sprechen und schreiben.: Festschrift für Helmut Glück zum 60. Geburtstag (pp. 17–28). Harrasowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lester, N. (2018). The syntactic bits of nouns: How prior syntactic distributions affect comprehension, production, and acquisition [Doctoral dissertation]. University of California at Santa Barbara.
Michaelis, L. A. (2013). Sign-based Construction Grammar. In Th. Hoffman & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 133–152). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michaelis, L. (2024). Staying terminologically rigid, conceptually open and socially cohesive: How to make room for the next generation of Construction Grammarians. Constructions and Frames, 16(2).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moretti, L. (2021). On multiple constructions and multiple factors in language change. The origin of auxiliary do [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Manchester.
Sag, I. A. (2012). Sign-based Construction Grammar: An informal synopsis. In H. C. Boas & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Sign-based Construction Grammar (pp. 1–30). CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sag, I. A., Boas, H. C., & Kay, P. (2012). Introducing Sign-based Construction Grammar. In H. C. Boas & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Sign-based Construction Grammar (pp. 69–202). CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, H.-J. (2020). The dynamics of the linguistic system: Usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sommerer, L., & Hartmann, S. (Eds.) (2023). 35 years of constructions [Special issue]. Constructions, 15(1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ungerer, T. (2022). Structural priming in the grammatical network: A study of English Argument Structure Constructions [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Edinburgh.
Ungerer, T., & Hartmann, S. (2023). Constructionist approaches. Past, present, future. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Trijp, R. (2024). Nostalgia for the future of Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames, 16(2).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Willich, A. (2022). Konstruktionssemantik: Frames in gebrauchsbasierter Konstruktionsgrammatik und Konstruktikographie. Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Boas, Hans C. & Steffen Höder
2025. What makes Construction Grammar relevant for contact linguistics — and vice versa?. In Constructions in Contact 3 [Constructional Approaches to Language, 40], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Hilpert, Martin, Benjamin Lyngfelt & Tiago Timponi Torrent
2025. The ConstructiCon: Language as a Cognitive Network of Constructions. In Reference Module in Social Sciences, DOI logo
Leclercq, Benoît & Cameron Morin
2025. The Meaning of Constructions, DOI logo
Schoonjans, Steven & Beatrix Schönherr
2025. Frequency issues in multimodal Construction Grammar revisited. Nota Bene 2:1 ► pp. 200 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Chi & Huichen S. Hsiao
2025. A corpus-based study of semantic prosody in ràng and shǐ constructions. Chinese as a Second Language Research 14:2 ► pp. 183 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue