Article published In: Constructions and Frames
Vol. 18:1 (2026) ► pp.100–138
Rhetorical schemes and Construction Grammar
The argument from chiasmus
Published online: 8 January 2026
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.24004.har
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.24004.har
Abstract
Formal rhetorical figures (schemes) have been largely neglected by Construction Grammar (CxG). The losses of this
omission are substantial. Like metaphors, schemes leverage general-purpose neurocognitive principles and evoke communicative
functions. They give utterances salience and memorability, making them highly compatible with usage-based models, and they align
form with function. Their association with ludic functions also makes them of considerable interest to
creativity-of-everyday-language linguists. Focusing on inverse-repetition figures (exemplified by “all for one and one for all”)
and a few collocate figures, this paper argues for integrating rhetorical schemes much more fully into CxG.
Keywords: figuration, rhetorical schemes, chiasmus, antimetabole, neurocognition
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Rhetorical figures: Definitions and categories
- 2.1Tropes and schemes
- 2.2Figural collocations
- 3.Chiastic constructions
- 3.1Chiastic form and function 1, reciprocal energy
- 3.2Chiastic form and function 2, anti-reciprocality
- 3.3Chiastic form and function 3: Reciprocal specification
- 3.4Chiastic form and function 4, subclass relations
- 4.The chiastic construction landscape
- 5.Conclusion: Impressive regularities
- Acknowledgement
- Notes
- Glossary of rhetorical terms
References
References (140)
Alter, A. L., & Obermeier, D. M. (2009). Uniting
the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology
Review, 13(3), 219–235.
Alter, C. (2014, September 29). Netanyahu
tells world leaders ‘Hamas is ISIS and ISIS is Hamas’. Time. [URL]
@AmoNickk. (2018, 07 Oct). do
u ever want to take a nap but the nap doesnt want to take u
[Tweet]. Twitter. [URL] (account now
suspended).
Antonopoulou, E., & Nikiforidou, K. (2009). Deconstructing
verbal humour with Construction Grammar. In G. Bröne & J. Vandaele (Eds.), Cognitive
poetics. Goals, gains and
gaps (pp. 289–314). Mouton de
Gruyter.
Atlantic Telegraph Company. (1857). The
Atlantic Telegraph: A history of preliminary experimental proceedings and a descriptive account of the present state and
prospects of the undertaking. Jarrold and sons.
Augustine of Hippo. (1996 [397
CE]). De doctrina christiana (R. Green, Ed.
& Trans.). Clarendon Press.
Bergs, A. (2018). Learn
the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist (Picasso): Linguistic aberrancy from a constructional
perspective. Zeitschrift Für Anglistik Und
Amerikanistik, 66(3), 277–293.
Berwick, R. C., Bolhuis, J. J., Chomsky, A. N., & Friederici, A. D. (2013). Evolution,
brain, and the nature of language. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences, 17(2), 89–98.
Bickerton, D. (2009). Adam’s
tongue: How humans made language, how language made humans. Hill and Wang.
Boeckx, C., & Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (2005). Language
as a natural object – linguistics as a natural science. The Linguistic
Review, 221, 447–466.
Brown, M. E. (2013). Schaum’s
outline of physics for engineering and science (3rd
ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Burton, G. O. (2016). Silva
rhetoricae: The forest of rhetoric. [URL]
(2013, May 24). “Beyond
Facism”. Noam Chomsky interviewed by John Holder and Doug Morris. ZNet. [URL]
Chomsky, A. N., & Lasnik, H. (1995). The
theory of principles and parameters. In The minimalist
program (pp. 13–127). The MIT Press.
Chomsky, A. N., Olson, G. A., & Faigley, L. (1991). Language,
politics, and composition: A conversation with Noam Chomsky. Journal of Advanced
Composition, 111, 61–95.
Chomsky, A. N., Roberts, I., & Watumull, J. (2023, March 8). The
false promise of ChatGPT. The New York Times. [URL]
Clinton, H. (2011, December 6). International
Human Rights Day Address at Palais des Nations. American Rhetoric. [URL]
Diessel, H. (2008). Iconicity
of sequence: A corpus-based analysis of the positioning of temporal adverbial clauses in
English. Cognitive
Linguistics, 19(3), 465–490.
Divjak, D. (2019). Frequency
in language: Memory, attention and learning. Cambridge University Press.
Eitelmann, M., & Haumann, D. (Eds.). (2022). Extravagant
morphology: Studies in rule-bending, pattern-extending and theory-challenging morphology. John Benjamins.
Ellsworth, M. J. (2001a). Asymmetric_reciprocality. In FrameNet. International Computer Science Institute.
(2001b). Symmetrical_collective_reciprocality. In FrameNet. International Computer Science Institute. [URL]
Fahnestock, J. (1999). Rhetorical
figures in science. Oxford University Press. [URL].
Fuller, S. (2000). Thomas
Kuhn: A philosophical history for our times. The University of Chicago Press.
Givón, T. (1985). Iconicity,
isomorphism and nonarbitrary coding in syntax. In J. Haiman (Ed.), Natural
syntax (pp. 187–220). John Benjamins.
Goldberg, A. (2019). Explain
me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton University Press.
@golub. (2022, November 7). You
can take the boy out of the apartheid country…[Tweet]. Twitter. [URL]
Grausso, C. M. (2020). Chiasmus:
A phenomenon of language, body and perception [Doctoral
dissertation]. University of Edinburgh. [URL]
Greer, G. (1988, June 3). The
proper study of womankind. The Times Literary
Supplement, 91, 616–629.
Harris, R. A. (2021). The
linguistics wars: Chomsky, Lakoff and the battle over Deep Structure. Oxford University Press.
(2022a). Chiastic
iconicity. In O. Fischer, C. Ljunberg, E. Tabakowska, & S. Lenninger (Eds.), Iconicity
in cognition and across semiotic
systems (pp. 103–134). John Benjamins.
(2022b). Review
of María Sandra Peña-Cervel and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez’s Figuring out figuration: A cognitive
linguistic account. LINGUIST
List, 341(1566). [URL]
(2022c). Grammatical
constructions and rhetorical figures: The case of chiasmus. LACUS
Forum, 46(1), 35–61.
(2023a). The
tropes: Metaphor and its friends. In J. Fahnestock & R. A. Harris (Eds.), Routledge
handbook of language and
persuasion (pp. 227–245). Routledge.
(2023b). Rules
are rules: Rhetorical figures and algorithms. In R. Loukanova, P. LeFanu Lumsdaine, & R. Muskens (Eds.), Logic
and algorithms in computational
linguistics (pp. 217–260). Springer.
Harrison, M. A. (1978). Introduction
to formal language theory. Addison-Wesley. [URL]
Harwell, D., Lorenz, T., & Zakrzewski, C. (2022, October 28). Racist
tweets quickly surface after Musk closes Twitter deal. Washington Post. [URL]
Hashemi, R., Chen, H., & Harris, R. A. (2024). Define
constructions before constructions define you: Rhetorical figures in the AB before BA
construction. Rhetor, 91, 11–63.
Hoffmann, T. (2018). Creativity
and Construction Grammar: Cognitive and psychological issues. Zeitschrift Für Anglistik Und
Amerikanistik, 66(3), 259–276.
(2024). The
5C model of linguistic creativity: Construction Grammar as a cognitive theory of verbal
creativity. Journal of Foreign Languages and
Cultures, 8(1), 139–154.
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing
statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. Sebeok (Ed.), Style
in
Language (pp. 350–377). The MIT Press.
Kara-Yakoubian, M., Walker, A. C., Sharpinskyi, K., Assadourian, G., Fugelsang, J. A., & Harris, R. A. (2022). Beauty
and truth, truth and beauty: Chiastic structure increases the subjective accuracy of
statements. Canadian Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 76(2), 144–155.
Kay, P., & Fillmore, C. J. (1999). Grammatical
Constructions and linguistic generalizations: The what’s X doing Y?
Construction. Language, 75(1), 1–33.
Keats, J. (1819). Ode
on a Grecian urn. In Annual of the Fine Arts for
1819. Retrieved from: The Poetry Foundation. [URL]
@KeithOlbermann. (2023, February 26). You
can take the @elonmusk out of apartheid…[Tweet]. Twitter. [URL]
Kennedy, J. F., & Sorensen, T. (1961a, January 20). Inaugural
address. Presidential Speeches, Miller Center. [URL]
(1961b, September 25). Address
before The United Nations General Assembly, 25 September 1961 | JFK Library [Audio
recording]. [URL]
Lakoff, G., Espenson, J., & Schwartz, A. (1991). Master
metaphor list. Second draft copy. University of California at Berkeley. Retrieved
from: [URL]
Lissner, A. (2007). Chi-thinking:
Chiasmus and cognition [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Maryland. [URL]
Ljungberg, C. (2020). Crisscrossing
James Joyce’s Ulysses: Chiasmus and
cognition. In P. Perniss, O. Fischer, & C. Ljungberg (Eds.), Operationalizing
iconicity (pp. 199–210). John Benjamins.
Macaulay, T. B. (1849). The
history of England from the accession of James the
Second (Vol. 11). Bernhard, Tauchnitz.
Magid, L. (2012, February 1). Zuckerburg
claims “We don’t build services to make money.” Forbes. [URL]
McGlone, M. S., & Tofighbakhsh, J. (2000). Birds
of a feather flock conjointly (?): Rhyme as reason in aphorisms. Psychological
Science, 11(5), 424–428.
Michaelis, L. S. (2013). Sign-based
Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffman & G. Trousdale (Eds.), In The
Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford University Press.
Müller, F. M. (1862). Lectures
on the science of language: Delivered at the Royal Institution of Great Britain. Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Nedjalkov, V. P. (Ed.). (2007). Reciprocal
constructions. John Benjamins.
Nerlich, B. (1992). Semantic
theories in Europe, 1830-1930: From etymology to contextuality. John Benjamins.
(1998). La
métaphore et la métonymie: Aux sources rhétoriques des théories sémantiques
modernes. Sémiotiques, 141, 143–170.
(1803). The
mathematical principles of natural philosophy (A. Motte, Trans.; Vol. 11). H.D. Symonds.
(2009, January 24). Not
marble nor the gilded monuments. Language Log. [URL]
Obermeier, C., Menninghaus, W., Von Koppenfels, M., Raettig, T., Schmidt-Kassow, M., Otterbein, S., & Kotz, S. A. (2013). Aesthetic
and emotional effects of meter and rhyme in poetry. Frontiers in
Psychology, 41.
O’Donnell, S. (Writer), & Moore, S. D. (Director). (1998). The
joy of sect (Season 9, Episode 13) [TV series episode]. In M. Groening, J. L. Brooks & M. Simon (Executive
Producers), The Simpsons. Fox Broadcasting Company.
Olson, M. H., & Ramírez, J. J. (2020). An
introduction to theories of learning (10th
ed.). Routledge.
Östman, J.-O. (2020). Constructions
as discourse-restrained flexible prototypes. Belgian Journal of
Linguistics, 341, 273–282.
Östman, J.-O., & Fried, M. (Eds.). (2004a). Construction
Grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions. John Benjamins.
(2004b). The
cognitive grounding of Constructional Grammar. In J.-O. Östman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction
Grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical
extensions. (pp. 1–13). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
(2009). On
spontaneous generation (A. Levine, Trans.). In A. Levine (Ed.), Scientific
process: Case studies on science in social
context (pp. 47–59). Kendall Hunt.
pdawg1234. (n.d.). What’s the
difference…?
[Reddit]. R/Jokes. Retrieved February 4, 2024, from [URL]
Pelkey, J. (2013). Cognitive
chiasmus: Embodied phenomenology in Dylan Thomas. Journal of Literary
Semantics, 42(1), 79–114.
(2017). The
semiotics of X: Chiasmus, cognition, and extreme body
memory. Bloomsbury. [URL]
Peña-Cervel, M. S., & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. (2022). Figuring
out figuration: A cognitive linguistic account. John Benjamins.
Pennycook, G., Allan Cheyne, J., Barr, N., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2015). On
the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit. Judgment and Decision
Making, 10(6), 549–563.
@PuzzleMonkeyZA. (2022, February 11). Take
the white boy out of apartheid…[Tweet]. Twitter. [URL]
Reber, R., & Unkelbach, C. (2010). The
epistemic status of processing fluency as source for judgments of truth. Review of Philosophy
and
Psychology, 1(4), 563–581.
@RedLetrCrusader. (2022, November 17). You
can take the boy out of apartheid South Africa…[Tweet]. Twitter. [URL]
Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints
on variables in syntax [Doctoral dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [URL]
(1970). Gapping
and the order of constituents. In M. Bierwisch & K. E. Heidolph (Eds.), Progress
in
linguistics (pp. 249–259). Mouton de Gruyter.
(2000). The
greening of language studies: May nouns and verbs interbe. In J. K. Peyton, P. Griffin, W. Wolfram, & R. W. Fasold. (Eds.), New
studies of language in society. Essays in honor of Roger W.
Shuy (pp. 177–186). Hampton Press.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Gómez González, M. de los Á. (2014). Constructing discourse and
discourse constructions. In M. de los Á. Gómez González, F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & F. Gonzálvez-García (Eds.), Theory
and practice in functional-cognitive
space (pp. 295–314). John Benjamins.
Sacks, J. (2022). Covenant
& conversation: From despair to hope. The Rabbi Sacks Legacy. [URL]
Sartwell, C. (2014, June 20). The
left-right political spectrum is bogus. The Atlantic. [URL]
Schwarz, B. (2006). Reciprocal
equatives. In E. Puig-Waldmüller (Ed.), Proceedings
of Sinn und
Bedeutung 111 (pp. 568–582). Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
Shakespeare, W. (1993/c1600). The
complete works of William
Shakespeare. http://shakespeare.mit.edu/
Song, X. [ 宋希仁]. (1995). “人人为我,我为人人”
不是道德命题 [Everyone for me, and I for everyone" is not a moral
proposition]. 现代哲学 [Modern
Philosophy], 021, 70–74.
Sonesson, G. (2008). From
the meaning of embodiment to the embodiment of meaning: A study in phenomenological
semiotics. Cognitive Linguistics
Research, 35(1), 85–128.
Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Terrace, H. (2016, September 29). The
birth of language. The New York Review of Books.
Tannen, D. (1999). Talking
voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge Univ. Press.
@tera_rist. (2023, May 14). If
it’s been said once…[Tweet]. Twitter. [URL]
Tesnière, L. (2015
[1959]). Elements of structural syntax (T. Osborne & S. Kahane, Trans.). John Benjamins.
Traxler, M. J., & Tooley, K. (2012). Lexical
and syntactic priming in language comprehension. In N. Hsu & Z. Schütt (Eds.), Psychology
of
priming (pp. 79–99). Nova Science Publishers.
Trousdale, G. (2018). Figurativeness
in English grammar: The role of metonymic tropes and schemes of
repetition. In R. Bohm & H. van der Hulst (Eds.), Substance-based grammar:
The ongoing work of John
Anderson (pp. 311–336). John Benjamins.
(1998). Figure. In C. Cacciari, R. Gibbs Jr., A. Katz, & M. Turner (Eds.), Figurative
language and
thought (pp. 44–87). Oxford University Press.
(2018). The
role of creativity in multimodal Construction Grammar. Zeitschrift Für Anglistik Und
Amerikanistik, 66(3), 357–370.
Ultrabook and laptop: What is the
difference. (2023, August 29). In RealExpert. [URL]
Unknown. (2013, March 7 2:20
AM). “The first reply to your thoughts …” [Comment on blog
post]. Faculty of language. [URL]
Vartiainen, T., & Säily, T. (2025). Constructional
approaches to creativity and productivity in English: Introduction. English Language and
Linguistics, 29(2), 1–9.
Vendler, Z. (2012). Comments. In C. D. Rollins (Ed.), Knowledge
and
experience (pp. 38–42). University of Pittsburgh Press.
Walker, D. (2011). God
in a brothel: An undercover journey into sex trafficking and rescue. InterVarsity Press.
Wells, K. (Guest
host). (2014, August 24). Race in
America [Radio show episode]. In The Sunday
Edition. CBC. [URL]
Wooters, C. (2001). Reciprocality. In FrameNet. International Computer Science Institute. [URL]
