Article published In: Constructions and Frames
Vol. 1:2 (2009) ► pp.190–220
The semantic range of the Dutch double object construction
A collostructional perspective
Published online: 10 December 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.1.2.02col
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.1.2.02col
Just like its English counterpart (cf. Goldberg 1995), the Dutch double object construction is a prime example of a highly polysemous argument structure construction, with a basic ‘X causes Y to receive Z’ sense and several extended meanings which depart from the prototype in various respects and to varying degrees. This paper provides a corpus-based overview of the semantic structure of this construction, following the multidimensional approach to constructional semantics advocated in Geeraerts (1998). On the basis of Stefanowitsch & Gries’s (2003) “collexeme analysis” method, we will identify the verbs which most typically realize the investigated construction in a one-million-word newspaper corpus. These verbs will be shown to instantiate extensions along various dimensions of semantic variation. Several of these semantic extensions are paralleled in English, while others are not.
Cited by (16)
Cited by 16 other publications
Valdeson, Fredrik
2023. The double object construction in 19th‑ and 20th‑century Swedish. In Ditransitives in Germanic Languages [Studies in Germanic Linguistics, 7], ► pp. 115 ff.
Zehentner, Eva, Melanie Röthlisberger & Timothy Colleman
2023. Ditransitive constructions in Germanic languages. In Ditransitives in Germanic Languages [Studies in Germanic Linguistics, 7], ► pp. 1 ff.
Peng, Rui
Vázquez-González, Juan G. & Jóhanna Barðdal
Rens, Dario
Bernolet, Sarah & Timothy Colleman
2016. Sense-based and lexeme-based alternation biases in the Dutch dative alternation. In Corpus-based Approaches to Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 19], ► pp. 165 ff.
Colleman, Timothy
2015. Constructionalization and post-constructionalization. In Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 18], ► pp. 213 ff.
Colleman, Timothy
2018. Distributional assimilation in constructional semantics. In Constructions in Contact [Constructional Approaches to Language, 24], ► pp. 143 ff.
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
HUELVA UNTERNBÄUMEN, ENRIQUE
Levshina, Natalia
2015. How Europeans GIVE. In Causation, Permission, and Transfer [Studies in Language Companion Series, 167], ► pp. 147 ff.
Levshina, Natalia
2016. A geometric exemplar-based model of semantic structure. In Corpus-based Approaches to Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 19], ► pp. 241 ff.
Delorge, Martine, Koen Plevoets & Timothy Colleman
2014. Competing ‘transfer’ constructions in Dutch. In Corpus Methods for Semantics [Human Cognitive Processing, 43], ► pp. 39 ff.
Glynn, Dylan
2014. Techniques and tools. In Corpus Methods for Semantics [Human Cognitive Processing, 43], ► pp. 307 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
