Cover not available

Article published In: Issues in Diachronic Construction Morphology
Edited by Muriel Norde and Graeme Trousdale
[Constructions and Frames 15:2] 2023
► pp. 234–256

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

English and German derivation revisited

A Diachronic Construction Morphology approach to the growing complexity of bases

ORCiD logo with link | University of Bonn
Published online: 8 January 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00074.len
Abstract
Today, a number of etymologically related native and non-native English and German suffixes derive nouns and adjectives from entire phrases, suggesting that these suffixes have evolved clitic-like properties. By providing a diachronic analysis of dictionary entries that is underpinned by corpus searches, this paper traces how this property of the schemas of German ‑ig, ‑er and ‑ismus and of English ‑y, ‑er and ‑ism has evolved in the respective languages. The present analysis reveals that some developments appear to have taken place in parallel, while others are language-specific, which offers novel insights to our understanding of diachronic change affecting morphological schemas.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Common ancestry
  • 3.Case study 1: German ‑ig and English ‑y
  • 4.Case study 2: German ‑er and English ‑er
  • 5.Case study 3: German ‑ism and English ‑ism
  • 6.Theoretical implications
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (42)
References
Bauer, L., Lieber, R., & Plag, I. (2013). The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bendzko, T. (2011). Nur noch kurz die Welt retten. Bendzko, T. Wenn Worte meine Sprache wären. Meyer, S. (Producer). Sony Music Entertainment.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, G. (2010). Construction Morphology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, G., & Masini, F. (2015). The role of second order schemas in the construction of complex words. In Bauer, L., Kőrtvélyessy, L., & Štekauer, P. (Eds.). Semantics of complex words. (pp. 47–66). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, G. (2018). Introduction and overview. In Booij, G. (Ed.). The construction of words. (pp. 3–16). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). The role of schemas in Construction Morphology. Word Structure 12(3), 385–395. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diewald, G., & Politt, K. (Eds.). (2022). Paradigms regained: Theoretical and empirical arguments for the reassessment of the notion of paradigm. Language Science Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (2014). Making new words. Morphological derivation in English. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DWDS – Digitales Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache (2023). Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften (Ed.) [URL]
Eitelmann, M.; Haugland, K., & Haumann, D. (2020). From engl-isc to whatever-ish: A corpus-based investigation of ‑ish-derivation in the history of English. English Language and Linguistics 24(4), 1–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). The nature of generalization in language. Cognitive Linguistics 20(1), 93–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hein, K. (2017). Modeling the properties of German phrasal compounds within a usage-based constructional approach. In Trips, C., & Kornfilt, J. (Eds.): Further investigations into the nature of phrasal compounding (pp. 119–148) Language Science Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, M. (2019). Higher-order schemas in morphology: What they are, how they work, and where to find them. Word Structure 12(3), 262–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Himmelmann, N. (2004). Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthognal? In Bisang, W., Himmelmann, N., & Wiemer, B. (Eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components (pp. 21–42) Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kempf, L. (2016). Adjektivsuffixe in Konkurrenz. Wortbildungswandel vom Frühneuhochdeutschen zum Neuhochdeutsch. Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, C., & Smith, N. (2009). Change in contemporary English. A grammatical study. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lensch, A. (2018). Fixer-uppers: Reduplication in the derivation of phrasal verbs. In Finkbeiner, R., & Freywald, U. (Eds.) Exact repetition in grammar and discourse, (pp. 158–181) Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Onlookers, passers-by, sweeper-uppers, opt-outers and dumber-downerers. A corpus-based study of English -er nominalizations. Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz PhD dissertation.
(2022). Diggers-out, leaf clearer-uppers and stayer-onner-for-nowers: On creativity and extravagance in English ‑er nominalizations. In Eitelmann, M. & Haumann, D. (Eds.) Extravagant morphology. (pp. 73–100) John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marchand, H. (19692). Categories and types of Present-Day English word-formation. A synchronic-diachronic approach. Beck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meibauer, J., Guttropf, A., & Scherer, C. (2004). Dynamic aspects of German ‑er-nominals: A probe into the interrelation of language change and language acquisition. Linguistics 42(1), 155–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norde, M. (2009). Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norde, M., & Trousdale, G. (2016). Exaptation from the perspective of Construction Morphology. Norde, M., & Van de Velde, F. (Eds) Exaptation and language change. (pp. 163–195). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary Online (2023). Oxford University Press. [URL]
Onysko, A. (2019). Processes of language contact in English influence on German. In Hickey, R. (Ed.) English in the German-speaking world. (pp. 185–207) Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plag, I. (2003). Word-formation in English (2nd ed). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pounder, A. (2000). Processes and paradigms in word-formation morphology. Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology 71, 532–547. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ryder, M. E. (1999). Bankers and blue-chippers. Of ‑er nominalizations in Present-day English. English Language and Linguistics 3(2), 269–297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Complex ‑er nominals: Where grammaticalization and lexicalization meet? In Contini-Morava, E., & Tobin, Y. (Eds.) Between grammar and lexicon (pp. 291–332). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scherer, C. (2005). Wortbildungswandel und Produktivität. Eine empirische Studie zur nominalen -er-Derivation im Deutschen.: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sketch Engine (2023). Lexical Computing CZ s.r.o. (Ed.) [URL]
The Guardian (and the Observer) Corpus (1990–2004). provided by Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Germany.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trips, C. (2009). Lexical semantics and diachronic morphology. The development of -hood, -dom and -ship in the history of English. Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Werner, M. (2020). Three diachronic sources for the development of ‑erei-based synthetic compounds in German. Word Structure 13(3), 347–370. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woerterbuchnetz.de (2023). Kompetenzzentrum – Trier Center for Digital Humanities (Ed.) [URL]
Wurzel, W. U. (1996). Morphologischer Strukturwandel: Typologische Entwicklungen im Deutschen. In Lang, E., & Zifonun, G. (Eds.): Deutsch typologisch (pp. 492–524). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwicky, A. M., & Pullum, G. K. (1983). Cliticisation vs. inflection. Language 59(3), 502–513. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Dong, Wenjie, Xi Mao, Wenjuan Lu, Jizhou Wang & Yao Cheng
2024. Construction and Inference Method of Semantic-Driven, Spatio-Temporal Derivation Relationship Network for Place Names. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 13:9 ► pp. 327 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue