Article published In: Issues in Diachronic Construction Morphology
Edited by Muriel Norde and Graeme Trousdale
[Constructions and Frames 15:2] 2023
► pp. 160–186
Diachronic changes in constructional networks
Evidence from Manchuric nominal morphology
Published online: 8 January 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00071.hol
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00071.hol
Abstract
This study investigates diachronic changes in constructional networks illustrated with examples from the Manchuric
branch of Tungusic, an endangered language family spoken in Northeast Asia. Earlier studies have noted pronounced differences
between this branch and the rest of the family, such as a reduction in morphological complexity and partial restructuring of the
morphosyntactic system. Based on the framework of Diachronic Construction Grammar, this study investigates aspects of nominal
morphology, including flagging and indexing. These are especially promising for a better understanding of the evolution of
Manchuric and have not often been discussed in terms of Construction Grammar.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The nominal template
- 3.Person indexing
- 3.1Loss of the paradigm
- 3.2Preservation in ordinal numerals
- 4.Flagging
- 4.1Reduction of the paradigm
- 4.2Extension of the genitive
- 4.3Preservation of the locative
- 4.4Debonding of case markers
- 5.Discussion and conclusion
- 5.1Network changes
- 5.2The nature of templates
- 5.3Areal patterns and language contact
- Notes
References
References (53)
Alonso de la Fuente, J. A. (2017). On internal reconstruction, morphological restructuration and nominal classes in Manchu. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 70(3), 347–370.
Audring, J. (2022). Advances in morphological theory: Construction Morphology and Relational Morphology. Annual Review of Linguistics 81, 39–58.
Benzing, Johannes. (1956). Die tungusischen Sprachen: Versuch einer vergleichenden Grammatik. Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur.
(2013). Morphology in Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 255–273). Oxford University Press.
Däbritz, C. L. (forthcoming). The structure of the noun phrase in Northern and Southern Ewenki dialects. International Journal of Eurasian Linguistics 51, 83–125.
(1978). Classification problems of Tungus. In G. Doerfer & M. Weiers (Eds.), Tungusica, vol. 11 (pp. 1–26). Harrassowitz.
Hölzl, A. (2015). A typology of negation in Tungusic. Studies in Language, 39(1), 117–157.
(2022a). ‘What’s your name?’ in Tungusic and beyond. In A. Hölzl & T. E. Payne (eds.), Tungusic languages: Past and present (pp. 89–148). Language Science Press.
(2022b). The etymology of “Manchu”: A critical evaluation of the riverside hypothesis. International Journal of Eurasian Linguistics, 4(2), 160–208.
Hölzl, A., & Payne, T. E. (2022). Introduction. In A. Hölzl & T. E. Payne (Eds.), Tungusic languages: Past and present (pp. 1–20). Language Science Press.
Iggesen, O. A. (2013). Number of cases. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]
(1985). The category of person in Tungus: Its representation in the indicative forms of verbs. Gengō Kenkyū, 881, 86–96.
Janhunen, J. (2012). The expansion of Tungusic as an ethnic and linguistic process. In A. Malchukov & L. J. Whaley (Eds.), Recent advances in Tungusic linguistics (pp. 5–16). Harrassowitz.
(2013). Personal pronouns in Core Altaic. In M. Robbeets & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Shared grammaticalization (pp. 211–226). John Benjamins.
Kiyose, G. N. (2000). Genealogical relationship of Jurchen dialects and literary Manchu. Central Asiatic Journal, 44(2), 177–189.
Nichols, J., & Bickel, B. (2013). Locus of marking in possessive noun phrases. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]
Perekhvalskaya, E. (2022). From consonant to tone: Laryngealized and pharyngealized vowels in Udihe. In A. Hölzl & T. E. Payne (Eds.), Tungusic languages: Past and present (pp. 227–262). Language Science Press.
Pevnov, A. M. 2012. On some archaic features of the Jurchen language. Hoppō jinbun kenkyū 51, 57–69.
Robbeets, M., & Oskolskaya, S. (2022). Proto-Tungusic in time and space. In A. Hölzl & T. E. Payne (Eds.), Tungusic languages: Past and present (pp. 263–294). Language Science Press.
Smirnova, E., & Sommerer, L. (2020). Introduction: The nature of the node and the network. Open questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar. In L. Sommerer & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar (pp. 1–42). John Benjamins.
Šnejder, E. R. (1936). Kratkij udèjsko-russkij slovar’. Gosudarstvennoe učebno-pedagogičeskoe izdatel’stvo.
Tsumagari, T. (1997). Linguistic diversity and national borders of Tungusic. Senri Ethnological Studies, 441, 175–186.
(2006). Morphological status of the Manchu case markers: Particle or suffix? In A. Pozzi, J. Janhunen & M. Weiers (Eds.), Tumen jalafun jecen akū (pp. 225–232). Harrassowitz.
(2009). Grammatical outline of Uilta (revised). Journal of the Graduate School of Letters, 41, 1–21.
Vovin, A. (2006). Why Manchu and Jurchen look so non-Tungusic? In A. Pozzi, J. Janhunen & M. Weiers (Eds.), Tumen jalafun jecen akū (pp. 255–266). Harrassowitz.
Whaley, L., & Oskolskaya, S. (2020). The classification of the Tungusic languages. In M. Robbeets & A. Savelyev (Eds.), The Oxford guide to the Transeurasian languages (pp. 81–91). Oxford University Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Hölzl, Andreas
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
