Cover not available

Article published In: Variation and Grammaticalization of Verbal Constructions
Edited by Dániel Czicza and Gabriele Diewald
[Constructions and Frames 14:1] 2022
► pp. 150–180

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Emerging into your family of constructions

German [IRR was] ‘no matter what’

 | Research Foundation – Flanders | Ghent University
 | Research Foundation – Flanders | Ghent University
 | Ghent University
Published online: 9 August 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00058.hae
Abstract
Starting from the term “family of constructions”, the present article investigates lexical and syntactic variation in a subtype of German concessive conditionals which is marked by was (‘what’) in combination with expressions of irrelevance like egal (‘no matter’). 12,894 examples from the DeReKo corpus (Deutsches Referenzkorpus) are analysed manually for seven variables. Both the quantitative and the qualitative results suggest that combinations of was with an expression of irrelevance, or “[IRR was]” for short, form part of a recently entrenched constructional schema [IRR w-] of concessive-conditional subordinators which are emerging into the family of concessive-conditional constructions in present-day German.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Concessive conditionals between discourse and syntax
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Expressions of irrelevance: Frequencies
    • 4.2Matrix clause ellipsis
    • 4.3Expressions of irrelevance and degree particles
    • 4.4Use of commas
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1The desententialisation cline, revisited
    • 5.2From entrenchment to secondary grammaticalization
  • 6.Conclusion and prospects
  • Notes
  • References
References (46)
References
Aarts, B. (2007). Syntactic gradience: The nature of grammatical indeterminacy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baschewa, E. (1980). Der Konzessivsatz im Neuhochdeutschen. Synchronische und diachronische Untersuchungen zu seiner Syntax, Semantik und Stilistik. Doctoral dissertation, Leipzig University.
Bossuyt, T. (2016). Zur Distribution von Irrelevanzpartikeln in was immer/auch-Konstruktionen: Positionelle und kombinatorische Varianz im Deutschen Referenzkorpus. Germanistische Mitteilungen, 421, 45–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). Concessive conditionals beyond Europe: A typological survey. Studies in Language, published online 14 February 2022. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bossuyt, T., De Cuypere, L. & Leuschner, T. (2018). Emergence phenomena in German W-immer/auch-subordinators. In E. Fuß, M. Konopka, B. Trawiński & U. H. Waßner (Eds.), Grammar and corpora 2016 (pp. 97–120). Heidelberg University Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bücker, J. (2016). Focus, scales and concessive conditionals in German. Language Sciences, 581, 163–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
d’Avis, F. (2016). Satztyp als Konstruktion: Diskussion am Beispiel ‘konzessive Konditionalgefüge’. In R. Finkbeiner & J. Meibauer (Eds.), Satztypen und Konstruktionen (pp. 267–295). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
[Duden-Grammatik (2016) =]: Wöllstein, A. (Ed.) (2016). Die Grammatik: Unentbehrlich für richtiges Deutsch (9th ed.). Dudenverlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
[Duden-Zweifelsfälle (2016) =]: Hennig, M. (Ed.) (2016). Das Wörterbuch der sprachlichen Zweifelsfälle: Richtiges und gutes Deutsch (8th ed.). Dudenverlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duffley, P. & Larrivée, P. (2020). Whatever floats your boat: A corpus-based investigation of definiteness, quantification, modality, presuppositional content, scalarity and epistemic stance with wh-ever words. International Review of Pragmatics, 12(2), 206–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fujii, S. Y. (1994). A family of constructions: Japanese TEMO and other concessive conditionals. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General session dedicated to the contributions of Charles J. Fillmorei (pp. 194–207). Url: [URL].
Geeraerts, D. (2010). Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gillmann, M. (2021). Analogy as driving force of language change: A usage-based approach to wo and da clauses in 17th and 18th century German. Cognitive Linguistics, ahead-of-print (, August 14, 2021). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. & Jackendoff, R. (2004). The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language, 80(3), 532–568. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th. (2013). Statistik für Sprachwissenschaftler. 2nd ed. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (1997). Indefinite pronouns: A typological study. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. & König, E. (1998). Concessive conditionals in the languages of Europe. In J. van der Auwera (Ed.), Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe (pp. 563–640). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. (1991). On some principles of grammaticization. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization: Vol. I, Focus on theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 17–36). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. & Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koch, P. & Oesterreicher, W. (1985). Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz: Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte. In Romanistisches Jahrbuch, 361, 15–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
König, E. (1986). Conditionals, concessive conditionals and concessives: Areas of contrast, overlap and neutralization. In E. C. Traugott, A. ter Meulen, J. Snitzer Reilly & Ch. A. Ferguson (Eds.), On conditionals (pp. 229–246). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1988). Concessive connectives and concessive sentences: Cross-linguistic regularities and pragmatic principles. In J. A. Hawkins (Ed.), Explaining language universals (pp. 145–166). Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1992). From discourse to syntax: The case of concessive conditionals. In R. Tracy (Ed.), Who climbs the grammar tree (pp. 423–433). Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
König, E. & van der Auwera, J. (1988). Clause integration in German and Dutch conditionals, concessive conditionals, and concessives. In J. Haiman & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse (pp. 101–133). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kupietz, M., Lüngen, H., Kamocki, P. & Witt, A. (2018). The German reference corpus DeReKo: New developments – new opportunities. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (pp. 4353–4360). [URL]
Kuteva, T. et al. (Eds.) (2019). World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, Ch. (1988). Towards a typology of clause linkage. In J. Haiman & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse (pp. 181–225). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015[1985]). Thoughts on grammaticalization. 3rd ed. Language Science Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leuschner, T. (2005). How to express indifference in Germanic: Towards a functional-typological research programme. In N. Delbeque, J. van der Auwera & D. Geeraerts (Eds.), Perspectives on variation: Sociolinguistic, historical, comparative (pp. 291–317). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Hypotaxis as building-site: The emergence and grammaticalization of concessive conditionals in English, German and Dutch. LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Concessive conditionals as a family of constructions. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 341, 235–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leuschner, T. & Segers, R. (2010). Sorry, aber das ist doch wohl völlig egal, oder? Zur Pragmatik der Indifferenz anhand des Partikelgebrauchs in Indifferenzausdrücken. In T. Harden & E. Hentschel (Eds.), 40 Jahre Partikelforschung (pp. 327–344). Stauffenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oppliger, R. (2018). Whatever the specific circumstances, …: A Construction Grammar perspective o[n] wh-ever clauses in English. In E. Seoane, C. Acuña-Fariña & I. Palacios-Martínez (Eds.), Subordination in English: Synchronic and diachronic perspectives (pp. 263–284). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rawlins, K. (2008). (Un)conditionals: An investigation in the syntax and semantics of conditional structures. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Tagliamonte, S. A. & Baayen, R. H. (2012). Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. In R. T. Cacoullos & W. Labov (Eds.), Language variation and change, 241 (pp. 135–178). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R. (2003). Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. & Trousdale, G. (Eds.) (2010). Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vander Haegen, F. (2019). Die Emergenz irrelevanzkonditionaler Subjunktoren des Typs egal was. Variation und Grammatikalisierung anhand des Deutschen Referenzkorpus. Germanistische Mitteilungen, 451, 113–138.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (2009[1953]). Philosophische Untersuchungen. Philosophical investigations. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe, P.M.S. Hacker und Joachim Schulte. Revised fourth edition by P.M.S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte. Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zaefferer, D. (1987). Satztypen, Satzarten, Satzmodi. Was Konditionale (auch) mit Interrogativen zu tun haben. In J. Meibauer (Ed.), Referate anläßlich der 8. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft, Heidelberg 1986 (pp. 259–285). Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). Conditionals and unconditionals: Cross-linguistic and logical aspects. In D. Zaefferer (Ed.), Semantic universals and universal semantics (pp. 210–236). Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Bossuyt, Tom
2025. Crosslinguistic constructions and strategies: where do concessive conditionals fit in?. Linguistics Vanguard DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue