In:Speaking of Colors and Odors
Edited by Martina Plümacher and Peter Holz
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 8] 2007
► pp. 185–202
11. Cognition, olfaction and linguistic creativity: Linguistic synesthesia as poetic device in cologne advertisement
Published online: 26 July 2007
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.8.11hol
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.8.11hol
The starting point of this paper is the observation that there is no consistent and conventionalized ‘lexicon of olfaction’ in any language. This is due in large part to the neurophysiological incongruence of language-processing and smellprocessing structures in the brain. Nonetheless we do in some way speak about smells, odors, scents. The discourse of cologne advertising, which I concentrate on, provides a vast amount of quasi-olfactory expressions. The majority of these adjectives, nouns and noun phrases are generated by synesthesia as a metaphorical process. On the theoretical basis of general semiotics (Peirce) and the poetic function of language (Jakobson), I assert that in cologne discourse poetic means are indispensable, since the referential function cannot cope adequately with describing smells.
Cited by (10)
Cited by ten other publications
Nikitina, Larisa & Fumitaka Furuoka
Tóth, Máté
Zawisławska, Magdalena & Marta Falkowska
2021. Typology of metaphors with the olfactory target domain in the Polish perfumery discourse. In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131], ► pp. 449 ff.
Zawisławska, Magdalena & Marta Falkowska
2021. Metaphors in Polish, English, Russian, and French perfumery discourse. Metaphor and the Social World 11:1 ► pp. 143 ff.
Bolognesi, Marianna & Francesca Strik Lievers
Winter, Bodo
2019. Synaesthetic metaphors are neither synaesthetic nor metaphorical. In Perception Metaphors [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 19], ► pp. 105 ff.
LEE, AMY PEI-JUNG
Strik Lievers, Francesca
Heckel, Maria, David Rester & Bernd Seeberger
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
