In:Slowing Metaphor Down: Elaborating Deliberate Metaphor Theory
Gerard J. Steen
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 26] 2023
► pp. 335–351
References
Published online: 6 June 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.26.refs
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.26.refs
Ahrens, K. (2019). First
Lady, Secretary of State and Presidential Candidate: A comparative study of
the role-dependent use of metaphor in
politics. In J. Perrez, M. Reuchamps, and P. H. Thibodeau (Eds.), Variation
in political
metaphor, pp. 13–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ahrens, K., & M.-H. Jiang. (2021). Source
domain verification using corpus-based
tools. Metaphor &
Symbol, 35(1), 43–55.
Baars, B. J. (1997). Some
essential differences between consciousness and attention, perception, and
working memory. Consciousness and
Cognition, 6(2–3):363–71.
Baars, B. J., and N. M. Gage. (2010). Cognition,
brain, and consciousness: Introduction to cognitive
neuroscience, second
edition. Amsterdam: Academic Press.
Barnden, J., and A. Gargett (Eds.) (2020). Producing
figurative expression: Theoretical, experimental and practical
perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Beger, A. (2011). Deliberate
metaphors? An exploration of the choice and functions of metaphors in
US-American college
lectures. Metaphorik.de 20, 39–60.
(2015). Metaphors
in psychology genres: Counselling vs. academic
lectures. In J. B. Herrmann and T. Berber Sardinha (Eds.), Metaphor
in specialist
discourse, pp. 163–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2016). Different
functions of (deliberate) metaphor in teaching scientific
concepts. Metaphorik.de 26, 61–86.
(2020). the brain is a computer and the mind is its program: Following a metaphor’s path from its birth to teaching philosophy decades later. In A. Beger and T. H. Smith (Eds.), How metaphors guide, teach and popularize science, pp. 263–296. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Beger, A., and O. Jaekel. (2015). The
cognitive role of metaphor in teaching science: Examples from physics,
chemistry, biology, psychology, and
philosophy. Philosophical
Inquiries 3(1), 89–132.
Beger, A., and T. H. Smith (Eds.) (2020a). How
metaphors guide, teach and popularize
science. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2020b). Introduction. In A. Beger and T. H. Smith (Eds.), How
metaphors guide, teach and popularize
science, pp. 1–37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Billig, M., and K. MacMillan (2005). Metaphor, idiom, and ideology: The search for “No smoking guns” across time. Discourse and Society, 16, 459–480.
Black, M. (1979). More
about
metaphor. In A. Ortony, Metaphor
and
thought, pp. 19–41. Cambridge: CUP.
Bock von Wülfingen, B. (2020). Metaphor
and the popularization of contested
technologies. In A. Beger and T. H. Smith (Eds.), How
metaphors guide, teach and popularize
science, pp. 113–140. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Boeynaems, A., Burgers, C., Konijn, E. and G. J. Steen. (2017). The
effects of metaphorical framing in political persuasion: A systematic
literature review. Metaphor &
Symbol, 32(2), 118–134.
Bogetić, K. (2017). Language
is a beautiful creature, not an old fridge: Direct metaphors as corrective
framing devices. Metaphor in the Social
World 7 (2), 190–212.
Borčić, N., and I. Čulo. (2019). The
rhetorical use of political metaphors before, during, and after the
presidency: Television interviews with the former Croatian
president. In J. Perrez, M. Reuchamps, and P. H. Thibodeau (Eds.), Variation
in political
metaphor, pp. 61–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Boroditsky, L., and J. Prinz. (2008). What
thoughts are made
of. In Semin, G. R., and Smith, Eds., Embodied
grounding: Social, Cognitive, Affective, and Neuroscientific
Approaches, pp. 98–115. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bougher, L. D. (2012). The
case for metaphor in political reasoning and
cognition. Political
Psychology 33, 145–163.
Bovair, S., and D. E. Kieras. (1985). A
guide to propositional analysis for research on technical
prose. In B. K. Britton and J. B. Black (Eds.), Understanding
expository
text, pp. 315–362. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
Brown, T. L.. (2020). Social
metaphors in cellular and molecular
biology. In A. Beger and T. H. Smith (Eds.), How
metaphors guide, teach and popularize
science, pp. 1–37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Burgers, C. F., Brugman, B. C., Renardel de Lavalette, K., and G. J. Steen. (2016). HIP:
A method for linguistic hyperbole identification in
discourse. Metaphor &
Symbol, 31 (3), 163–178.
Burgers, C. F., Konijn, E. A., and G. J. Steen. (2016). Figurative
framing: Shaping public discourse through metaphor, hyperbole and
irony. Communication
Theory, 26(4), 410–430.
Butler, C. S. (2003). Structure and function: A guide to three major structural-functional theories. Part 1: Approaches to the simplex clause Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2003). Structure and function: A guide to three major structural-functional theories. Part 2: From clause to discourse and beyond Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2011). Metaphor
and reconciliation: The discourse dynamics of empathy in post-conflict
conversations. New York: Routledge.
Cameron, L., and A. Deignan. (2003). Combining
Large and Small Corpora to Investigate Tuning Devices Around Metaphor in
Spoken Discourse. Metaphor and
Symbol, 18(3), 149–160.
Cameron, L., Maslen, R., Todd, Z., Maul, A. J., Stratton, P., and N. Stanley. (2009). The
discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse
analysis. Metaphor and
Symbol, 24(2), 63–89.
Carston, R. (2010). Metaphor:
Ad hoc concepts, literal meaning and mental
images. Proceedings of the Aristotelian
Society, New
Series, 110, pp. 295–321.
Carston, R., and C. Wearing. (2011). Metaphor,
hyperbole, and simile: A pragmatic
approach. Language and
Cognition, 3(2), 283–312.
Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse,
consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience
in speaking and
writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Politicians
and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of
Metaphor. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
(2012). Forensic
deliberations on ‘purposeful
metaphor’. Metaphor in the Social
World 2 (1), 1–21.
(2013). What
is the purpose of metaphor in political discourse? An answer from Critical
Metaphor Analysis. Source and
year?
Cleeremans, A. (2014). Connecting
conscious and unconscious
cognition. Cognitive
Science, 38(6), 1286–1315.
Cleeremans, A., and A. Tallon-Baudry. (2021). The
function of consciousness is to generate
experience.
Coulson, S. (2008). Metaphor
comprehension and the
brain. In R. W. Gibbs, jr. (Ed.), The
Cambridge handbook of metaphor and
thought, 177–194. Cambridge: CUP.
Cuberos, R., Rosado, E. & J. Perera. (2019). Using
deliberate metaphor in discourse: Native vs. non-native text
production. In A. J. Silvestre-López (Ed.), Current
approaches to metaphor analysis in
discourse, pp. 235–256. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cuccio, Valentina. (2018). Attention
to metaphor: From neurons to
representations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cushing, I. (2019). Resources
not rulebooks: Metaphors for grammar in teachers’ metalinguistic
discourse. Metaphor and the social
world, 9(2), 155–176.
De Joode, J., and H. van Loon. (2013). Selecting
and analyzing metaphors in the Hebrew Bible: Cognitive linguistics and the
literary. In K. Smelik and K. Vermeulen (Eds), Approaches
to literary readings of ancient Jewish
writings, pp. 39–52. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
De Vries, C., Reijnierse, W. G., and R. Willems. (2018). Eye
movements reveal readers’ sensitivity to deliberate metaphors during
narrative reading. Scientific Study of
Literature, 8(1), 135–164.
Deignan, A. 2005. Metaphor
and corpus
linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2017). From
linguistic to conceptual
metaphors. In E. Semino and Z. Demjén (Eds.), The
Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and
Language, pp. 102–116. New York: Routledge.
Deignan, A., Littlemore, J., and E. Semino. (2013). Figurative
Language, Genre and
Register. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Di Biase-Dyson, C. (2020). A
typological framework of attention-drawing strategies for Ancient Egyptian
metaphorical
language. In C. Di Biase-Dyson and M. Egg (Eds.), Drawing
attention to metaphor: Case studies across time periods, cultures and
modalities, pp. 39–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Di Biase-Dyson, C., and M. Egg. (2020a). Drawing
attention to metaphor: Case studies across time periods, cultures and
modalities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2020b). Drawing
attention to metaphor: An introduction to the
debate. In C. Di Biase-Dyson and M. Egg (Eds.), Drawing
attention to metaphor: Case studies across time periods, cultures and
modalities, pp. 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dorst, A. G. (2011a). Metaphor
in fiction: Language, thought and
communication. Uitgeverij BoxPress.
(2011b). Personification
in discourse: Linguistic forms, conceptual structures and communicative
functions. Language and
literature 20(2), 113–135.
(2015). More
or different metaphors in fiction? A quantitative cross-register
comparison. Language and
literature 24 (1), 3–22.
Dorst, A. G., and W. G. Reijnierse. (2015). A
dictionary gives definitions, not decisions: On using a dictionary to
identify the basic senses of words. Metaphor
and the social
world, 5(1), 137–144.
Egg, M. (2020). To
those walking in the footsteps of the faith: Deliberate metaphor in the
Pauline
epistles. In C. Di Biase-Dyson and M. Egg (Eds.), Drawing
attention to metaphor: Case studies across time periods, cultures and
modalities, pp. 229–262. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Erdmann, S. (2016). Figurative
language and multicultural education: metaphors of language acquisition and
retention. Journal of Multilingual and
Multicultural
Development, 37(2), 184–188.
Ervas, Francesca. (2017). Another
metaphor is possible: Challenging social stereotypes in figurative language
comprehension. Reti, saperi,
linguaggi, 1, 79–96.
Evans, V. (2009). How
words mean: Lexical concepts, cognitive models, and meaning
construction. Oxford: OUP.
Fedriani, C. (2020). Conventionality,
deliberateness, and creativity in metaphors: toward a typology of figurative
expressions in Latin semantics. CLUB Working
Papers in
Linguistics, 4, 33–46.
Felekidou, D. (2020). Figurative
framing in the aftermath of a financial crisis: The case of metaphor in the
speech of Greece’s PM in Ithaca, August 2018. Μελέτες για την ελληνική
γλώσσα, 40, 633–642.
Fenton-Smith, (2019). Knifed in the back: A metaphor analysis of party leadership takeovers. In J. Perrez, M. Reuchamps, and P. H. Thibodeau (Eds.), Variation
in political
metaphor, pp. 13–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ferella, C. (2020). Early
Greek medical metaphors and the question of
deliberateness. In C. Di Biase-Dyson and M. Egg (Eds.), Drawing
attention to metaphor: Case studies across time periods, cultures and
modalities, pp. 129–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ferretti, T. R., Schwint, C. A., and Katz, A. N. (2007).Electrophysiological and behavioral measures of the influence of literal and figurative textual constraints on proverb comprehension. Brain and language, 101, 38–49.
Finsen, A. B., Steen, G. J., and J. Wagemans. (2019). An
argumentative reconstruction of the computer metaphor of the
brain. Journal of Argumentation in
Context 8(3), 317–335.
. (2021). How
do scientists criticize the computer metaphor of the brain? Using an
argumentative pattern for reconstructing resistance to
metaphor. Journal of Argumentation in
Context 10(2), 171–201.
Flusberg, Stephen, Matlock, Teenie, and Paul Thibodeau. (2018). War
metaphors in public discourse. Metaphor &
Symbol 33 (1), 1–18.
Fokkema, D. W., and E. Kunne-Ibsch. (1977). Theories
of literature in the twentieth century: Structuralism, Marxism, aesthetics
of reception,
semiotics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Forbus, K. D., Gentner, D., and K. Law. (1995). MAC/FAC:
A model of similarity-based
retrieval. Cognitive
Science, 19(2), 141–205.
Gambi, C., and M. J. Pickering. (2011). A
cognitive architecture for the coordination of
utterances. Frontiers in
Psychology.
Garrod, S., and M. J. Pickering. (2007). Automaticity
and language production in monologue and
dialogue. In A. S. Meyer, L. R. Wheeldon, and A. Krott (Eds.), Automaticity
and control in language
processing, pp. 1–20. Hove and New York: Psychology Press.
Garrod, S., and Pickering, M. J. (2009). Joint
action, interactive alignment and
dialogue. Topics in Cognitive
Science, 1,292–304.
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping:
A theoretical framework for
analogy. Cognitive
Science, 7, 155–170.
Gentner, D., and B. Bowdle. (2008). Metaphor
as
structure-mapping. In R. W. Gibbs, jr. (Ed.), The
Cambridge handbook of metaphor and
thought, pp. 109–128. Cambridge: CUP.
Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. J., and B. N. Kokinov (Eds.) (2001). The
analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive
science. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Gibbs, R. W., jr. (1994). The
poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and
understanding. Cambridge: CUP.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2011a). Are
‘deliberate’ metaphors really deliberate? A question of human consciousness
and action. Metaphor and the Social
World 1 (1), 26–52.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2015a). Do
pragmatic signals affect conventional metaphor understanding? A failed test
of deliberate metaphor theory. Journal of
Pragmatics 90, 77–87.
Gibbs, R. W., jr., and E. Chen. (2016). Taking
metaphor studies back to the Stone Age: A reply to Xu, Zhang, and
Wu. Intercultural
Pragmatics 14 (1), 117–124.
. (2018). Metaphor
and the automatic mind. Metaphor in the
Social
World 8 (1), 40–63.
Gibbs, R. W., and R. J. Gerrig. (1989). How
context makes metaphor comprehension seem
“special.” Metaphor & Symbolic
Activity, 4(3), 145–158.
Gibbs, R. W., jr., and T. Matlock. (2008). Metaphor,
imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic
evidence. In R. W. Gibbs, jr. (Ed.), The
Cambridge handbook of metaphor and
thought, pp. 161–176. Cambridge: CUP.
Gibbs, R. W., jr., and M. Tendahl. (2006). Cognitive
effort and effects in metaphor comprehension: Relevance theory and
psycholinguistics. Mind &
Language, 21, 379–403.
(2008). Is
metaphor
unique? In R. W. Gibbs, jr. (Ed.), The
Cambridge handbook of metaphor and
thought, pp. 143–160. Cambridge: CUP.
Giora, R., and O. Fein (1999b). On understanding familiar and less familiar figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1601–1608.
(2008). How
metaphors create categories –
quickly. In R. W. Gibbs, jr. (Ed.), The
Cambridge handbook of metaphor and
thought, pp. 67–83. Cambridge: CUP.
Glucksberg, S., and C. Haught (2006). On the relation between metaphor and simile: When comparison fails. Mind & Language, 21, 360–378.
Gómez-Moreno, J. M. (2016). Refining
the understanding of novel metaphor in specialized language
discourse. Terminology, 22(1), 1–29.
Górska, E. (2010). “LIFE
IS MUSIC: A case study of a novel metaphor and its use in
discourse”. English Text
Construction, 3(2), 275–293.
Greenfield, S. (2016). A
day in the life of the brain: The neuroscience of consciousness from dawn
till
dusk. London: Allen Lane.
Hamann, A. (2020). In
search of deliberateness in Maya glyphic
texts. In C. Di Biase-Dyson and M. Egg (Eds.), Drawing
attention to metaphor: Case studies across time periods, cultures and
modalities, pp. 189–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hampe, B. (Ed.) (2005). From
perception to meaning: Image schemas in Cognitive
linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Hart, C. (2017). ‘Riots
engulfed the city’: An experimental study investigating the legitimating
effects of fire metaphors in discourses of
disorder. Discourse &
Society 29 (3), 279–298.
(2020). Animals
vs. armies: Resistance to extreme metaphors in anti-immigration
discourse. Journal of language and
politics, 20 (2), 226–253.
Herrmann, J. B. (2013). Metaphor
in academic discourse: Linguistic forms, conceptual structures,
communicative functions and cognitive
representations. LOT Dissertation Series,
333. Utrecht: LOT.
(2015). High
on metaphor, low on simile? An examination of metaphor type in sub-registers
of academic
prose. In J. B. Herrmann and T. Berber Sardinha (Eds.), Metaphor
in specialist
discourse, pp. 163–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Herrmann, J. B., and T. Berber Sardinha (Eds.) (2015). Metaphor
in specialist
discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heyvaert, P., (2019). Fairies,
Christmas miracles and sham marriages: A diachronic analysis of deliberate
metaphors in Belgian political
discourse. In J. Perrez, M. Reuchamps, and P. H. Thibodeau (Eds.), Variation
in political
metaphor, pp. 35–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heyvaert, P., Randour, F., Dodeigne, J., Perrez, J., and M. Reuchamps. (2020). Metaphors
in political communication: A case study of the use of deliberate metaphors
in non-institutional political
interviews. Journal of Language and
Politics, 19(2), 201–225.
Hofstadter, D., and E. Sander. (2013). Surfaces
and essences: Analogy as the fuel and fire of
thinking. New York: Basic Books.
Holyoak, K. J., and D. Stamenković. (2018). Metaphor
comprehension: A critical review of theories and
evidence. Psychological
Bulletin, 144(6), 641–671.
Horton, W. (2018). Theories
and approaches to the study of conversation and interactive
discourse. In M. F. Schober, D. N. Rapp, and N. A. Britt (Eds.) The
Routledge handbook of discourse processes, second
edition, pp. 22–68. New York and London: Routledge.
Jansen, C., Van Nistelrooij, M., Olislagers, K., Van Sambeek, M., and De Stadtler, L. (2010). A
fire station in your body: Metaphors in educational texts on
HIV/AIDS. South African Linguistics and
Applied Language
Studies 28 (2), 133–139.
Jiménez Muñoz, A. J., and A. C. Lahuerta Martínez. (2017). A
metaphor-metonymy continuum? Evidence from cross-field L2 set
texts. Ibérica, 34, 257–278.
Jurafsky, D., Chahuneau, V., Routledge, B. R., and N. A. Smith. (2014). Narrative
framing of consumer sentiment in online restaurant
reviews. First
Monday, 19(4).
Karapetjana, I., and G. Roziņa. (2021). Metaphoric
conceptualization of social reality in the language of news
media. Baltic Journal of English Language,
Literature and
Culture, 11, 65–78.
Keating, J. (2021). Populist
discourse and active metaphors in the 2016 US presidential
elections. Intercultural
Pragmatics, 18(4), 499–531.
Kendeou, P., and E. J. O’Brien. (2018). Reading
comprehension theories: A view from the top
down. In M. F. Schober, D. N. Rapp, and N. A. Britt (Eds.) The
Routledge handbook of discourse processes, second
edition, pp. 7–21. New York and London: Routledge.
(2008). How
the mind computes the meaning of metaphor: A simulation based on
LSA. In R. W. Gibbs, jr. (Ed.), The
Cambridge handbook of metaphor and
thought, pp. 129–124. Cambridge: CUP.
Kintsch, W., and T. A. van Dijk. (1978). Toward
a model of text comprehension and
production. Psychological
Review, 85, 363–394.
Koller, V., Hardie, A., Rayson, P., and Semino, E. (2008). Using
a semantic annotation tool for the analysis of metaphor in
discourse. Metaphorik.de, 15, 141–160.
Krennmayr, T. (2011). Metaphor
in newspapers. LOT Dissertation Series,
276. Utrecht: LOT.
Krennmayr, T., Bowdle, B., Mulder, G., and G. J. Steen. (2014). Economic
competition is like auto racing: Building metaphorical schemas when reading
text. Metaphor and the Social
World 4(1), 65–89.
Krennmayr, T., and G. J. Steen, G. J. (2017). The
VU Amsterdam Metaphor
Corpus. In N. Ide and J. Pustejovsky (Eds.), Handbook
of linguistic
annotation, pp. 1053–71. Berlin: Springer.
Laineste, L., and W. Chłopicki. (2019). Co-construction
of metaphors in Estonian
conversation. Journal of
Pragmatics, 153(11), 92–102.
(1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought, Second edition, pp. 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2004). Don’t
think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the
debate. White River Junction, Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.
(2008). The
neural theory of metaphor. In R
In R. W. Gibbs, jr. (Ed.), The
Cambridge handbook of metaphor and
thought, pp. 17–38. Cambridge: CUP.
Lakoff, G., and Turner, M. (1989). MOre than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lancaster, M. (2021). Metaphor
research and the Hebrew Bible. Currents in
Biblical
Research, 19(3), 235–285.
Landau, M. J., Robinson, M. D., and B. P. Meier. (2013). The
power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social
life. Washington, DC: APA.
Lawley, J., and P. Tompkins. (2000). Metaphors
in mind: Transformation through symbolic
modelling. London: Developing Company Press.
Lemaire, B., Denhière, G., Bellissens, C., and S. Jhean-Larose. (2006). A
computational model for simulating text
comprehension. Behavior Research
Methods, 38(4), 628–637.
Littlemore, J. (2015). Metaphor
in specialist discourse: Insights and implications for metaphor studies and
beyond. In J. B. Herrmann and T. Berber Sardinha (Eds.), Metaphor
in specialist
discourse, pp. 299–314. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Littlemore, J., Krennmayr, T., Turner, J., and S. Turner. (2014). An
Investigation into Metaphor Use at Different Levels of Second Language
Writing. Applied
Linguistics, 35(2), 117–144.
Lodge, D. (1977). The
modes of modern writing: Metaphor, metonymy, and the typology of modern
literature. London: Edward Arnold.
Lotman, J. (2011). The
place of art among other modelling
systems. Sign Systems
Studies, 39(2–4), 249–269.
Mann, W. C., and S. A. Thompson. (1988). Rhetorical
Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text
organization. Text, 8, 243–281.
McNamara, D. S., and L. K. Allen. (2018). Toward
an integrative perspective of writing as a discourse
process. In M. F. Schober, D. N. Rapp, and N. A. Britt (Eds.) The
Routledge handbook of discourse processes, second
edition, pp. 1–3. New York and London: Routledge.
McNamara, D. S., Graesser, A., McCarthy, P. M., Cai, Z. (2014). Automated
evaluation of text and discourse with
Coh-Metrix. Cambridge: CUP.
McNamara, D. S., and J. Magliano. (2009). Toward
a Comprehensive Model of
Comprehension. In B. Ross (Ed.), The
psychology of learning and motivation, Vol.
51, pp.297–384. Burlington: Academic Press.
Meyer, A. S., Wheeldon, L. R., and A. Krott (Eds.) (2007). Automaticity
and control in language processing. Hove and New York: Psychology Press.
Miller, G. A. (1979/1993). Images
and models, similes and
metaphors. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor
and Thought, second
ed., pp. 186–201. Cambridge: CUP.
Mishra, R. K. (2015). Interaction
between attention and language systems in humans: A cognitive science
perspective. New Delhi etc.: Springer.
Mujagić, M. (2018). Dangerous
waters metaphor in news discourse on refugee
crisis. metaphorik.de 28, 99–131.
(2022). The
migration as an invasion and the common european house
metaphors in media discourse. ExELL
(Explorations in English Language and
Linguistics), 10(1), 22–50.
Mujagić, M., and S. Berberović. (2019). The
IMMIGRANTS ARE ANIMALS metaphor as a deliberate metaphor in British and
Bosnian-Herzegovinian media. ExELL
(Explorations in English Language and
Linguistics), 7(1), 22–51.
Müller, C. (2008). Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamic view. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor
and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about
Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
(2015). Dehumanizing
metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online
media. Journal of Language aggression and
conflict 3 (1), 41–56.
(2016b). Cross-cultural
variation in deliberate metaphor
interpretation Metaphor in the Social
World 6 (2), 205–224.
Nacey, S. (2013). Metaphors
in learner
English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2017). Metaphor
comprehension and production in a second
language. In E. Semino and Z. Demjén, Z. (Eds.), The
Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and
Language, pp. 503–516. New York: Routledge.
Nacey, S., Dorst, A. G., Krennmayr, T., and W. G. Reijnierse (Eds.) (2019). Metaphor
identification in multiple languages: MIPVU around the
world.
Navarro i Ferrando, I. (2016). Metaphorical
aspects in cancer
discourse. In P. Ordóñez-López and N. Edo-Marzá, N. (Eds.), Medical
discourse in professional, academic and popular
Settings, pp. 120–148. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 120–148.
(2017). Conceptual
metaphor types in oncology: Cognitive and communicative
functions. Ibérica, 34, 163–188.
(2021). Metaphorical
concepts and their cognitive functions in medical discourse: Research papers
vs. press articles. ESP
Today, 9(1), 150–174.
Negrea-Busuic, E., and D. Ritchie. (2015). When
‘seeking love is travel by bus’: Deliberate metaphors, stories and humor in
a Rumanian song. Metaphor in the Social
World 5 (1), 62–83.
Ng, J. W. (2016). Hottest
brand, coolest pedagogy: Approaches to corporate branding in Singapore
higher education sector. Journal of Marketing
for higher
education 26 (1), 41–63.
Ng, J. W., and V. Koller. (2013). Deliberate
conventional metaphors in images: The case of corporate branding
discourse. Metaphor &
Symbol 28 (3), 131–147.
Norman, D. A., and T. Shallice. (1983). Attention
to action – willed and automatic control of
behavior. In R. J. Davidson, D. E. Schwartz, and D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness
and self-regulation: Advances in research, Vol.
IV, pp. 1–18. New York: Plenum Press.
Ogden, C. K., and I. A. Richards. (1923). The
meaning of meaning: A study of the influence of language upon thought and of
the science of symbolism. Orlando, Fl.: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Ortony, A. (Ed.) (1993). Metaphor and thought, Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pasma, T. (2011). Metaphor
and register variation: The personalization of Dutch news
discourse. Oisterwijk: BoxPress.
Pehlivanović, A., and M. Mujagić. (2022). The
linguistic metaphor storm clouds in public discourse on
COVID 19. Post
Scriptum, 11–12, 339–351.
Perfetti, C. A., and A. M. Britt. (1995). Where
do propositions come
from? In C. A. Weaver, III, S. Mannes, and C. R. Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse
comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter
Kintsch, pp. 11–34. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
Perfetti, C. A., and J. Stafura. (2014). Word
knowledge in a theory of reading
comprehension. Scientific Studies of
Reading, 18(1), 22–37.
Perrez, J., and M. Reuchamps. (2014). Deliberate
metaphors in political discourse: The case of citizen
discourse. metaphorik.de 20, 7–41.
. (2015). A
crazy machine or a strong “living apart together” relationship? The role of
metaphors in citizens’ perception of Belgian
federalism. Mots. Les langages du politique,
109.
Perrez, J., Reuchamps, M., and P. Thibodeau (Eds.) (2019). Variation
in political
metaphor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Piata, A. (2020). Is
all poetic metaphor deliberate? Exploring the relationship between verbal
creativity and
deliberateness. In C. Di Biase-Dyson and M. Egg (Eds.), Drawing
attention to metaphor: Case studies across time periods, cultures and
modalities, pp. 207–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pickering, J. M., and S. Garrod. (2004). Towards
a mechanistic psychology of
dialogue. Behavioural and Brain
Sciences, 27, 169–226.
Pickering, M. J., and S. Garrod. (2013). An
integrated theory of language production and
comprehension. Behavioral and Brain
Sciences, 36(4), 329–392.
Pollack, J. (2014). Shortcut:
How analogies reveal connections, spark innovation, and sell our greatest
ideas. New York: Avery.
Pragglejaz
Group. (2007). MIP: A
method for identifying metaphorically used words in
discourse. Metaphor and
Symbol, 22(1), 1–39.
Pynte, J., Besson, M., Robichon, F., and J. Poli. (1996). The
time course of metaphor comprehension.: An event-related potential
study. Brian &
Language, 55, 293–316.
Rayson, P. (2008). From
key words to key semantic
domains. International Journal of Corpus
Linguistics, 13 (4), 519–549.
Reijnierse, W. G., Burgers, C. J., Krennmayr, T., and G. J. Steen. (2015). How
viruses and beasts affect our opinions (or not): The role of extendedness in
metaphorical framing. Metaphor and the Social
World 5(2), 245–263.
. (2018a). DMIP:
A method for identifying potentially deliberate metaphor in language
use. Corpus
Pragmatics, 2(2), 129–147.
. (2018b). On
metaphorical views, dynamite, and doodlings: Functions of domain adjectives
in metaphorical domain constructions. Review
of Cognitive
Linguistics, 16(2), 431–452.
. (2019). Metaphor
in communication: The distribution of potentially deliberate metaphor across
register and word
class. Corpora, 14(3), 301–326.
. (2020). The
role of co-text in the analysis of potentially deliberate
metaphor. In M. Egg and C. di Biase-Dyson (Eds.), Drawing
attention to metaphor: Case studies across time periods, cultures and
modalities, pp. 15–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Renardel de Lavalette, K., Andone, C., and G. J. Steen. (2019a). “I
did not say that the Government should be plundering anybody’s
savings.” Resisting metaphors expressing
starting points in parliamentary debates. Journal of Language and
Politics 18 (5), 718–738.
. (2019b). Figurative
analogies and how they are resisted in British Public Bill Committee
debates. Metaphor and the Social
World 9(1), 107–130.
Rewiś-Łętkowska, A. (2019). The
linguistic, conceptual and communicative dimension of metaphor: A corpus
study of conversational Polish. Journal of
Pragmatics, 153, 80–91.
Ritchie, David, & Elena Negrea-Busuic. (2014). “Now
everybody knows I’m a serial
killer”. Spontaneous intentionality in
conversational metaphor and story telling Metaphor in the Social
World 4 (2), 174–198.
Roncero, C., de Almeida, R. G., Martin, D. C., and Marco de Caro. (2016). Aptness
predicts metaphor preference in the lab and on the
internet. Metaphor and
Symbol, 31(1), 31–46.
Rossi, M. G. (2016). Metaphors
for patient education: A pragmatic-argumentative approach applying to the
case of diabetes
care. RIFL, 2, 34–48.
Rubio Fernandez, P. (2007). Suppression in metaphor interpretation: Differences between meaning selection and meaning construction. Journal of Semantics, 24, 345–371.
Sanford, A. J. (2002). Context,
attention and depth of processing during
interpretation. Mind &
Language, 17(1&2), 188–206.
Sanford, A. J., and S. C. Garrod. (2005). Memory-based
approaches and beyond. Discourse
Processes, 39(2–3), 205–224.
Sanford, A. J. S., Sanford, A. J., Molle, J., & C. Emmott. (2006). Shallow
processing and attention capture in written and spoken
discourse. Discourse
Processes, 42(2), 109–130.
Schilperoord, J. (2018). Ways
with pictures: Visual incongruities and
metaphor. In G. J. Steen (Ed.), Visual
metaphor: Structure and
process, pp. 11–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schober, M. F., Rapp, D. N., and N. A. Britt (Eds.) (2018a). The
Routledge handbook of discourse processes. Second
edition. New York and London: Routledge.
(Eds.) (2018b). Introduction:
Discourse processes
evolving. In M. F. Schober, D. N. Rapp, and N. A. Britt (Eds.) The
Routledge handbook of discourse processes, second
edition, pp. 1–3. New York and London: Routledge.
Schoor, C. (2015). Political
metaphor, a matter of purposeful style: On the rational, emotional, and
strategic purposes of political
metaphor. Metaphor in the Social
World 5 (1), 82–101.
Semino, E., Demjén, Z., and J. Demmen. (2016). An
integrated approach to metaphor and framing in cognition, discourse and
practice, with an application to metaphors for
cancer. Applied linguistics,
Vol.39 (5), p.625–645.
Semino, E., Demjén, Z., Hardie, A., Payne, S., and P. Rayson. (2018). Metaphor,
Cancer and the End of Life: A Corpus-Based
Study. New York: Routledge.
Semino, E., and G. J. Steen. (2008). Metaphor
in
literature. In R. W. Gibbs, jr. (Ed.), The
Cambridge handbook of metaphor and
thought, 232–246. Cambridge: CUP.
Shklovskij, V. (1998). “Art
as
Technique”. In J. Rivkin and M. Ryan (Eds.), Literary
Theory: An
Anthology. Malden: Blackwell.
Silvestre-López, A. J. (2019). Deliberate
metaphors in Buddhist teachings about
meditation. In A. J. Silvestre-López (Ed.), Current
approaches to metaphor analysis in
discourse, pp. 205–234. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2020). Conceptual
metaphor in meditation discourse: An analysis of the spiritual
perspective. Journal of Language Studies
Volume 20(1), 35–53.
(2022). Uses
and functions of conceptual metaphor in pedagogical meditation
discourse. ELUA, 38, 47–72.
Silvestre-López, A. J., and I. Navarro i Ferrando. (2017). Metaphor
in the conceptualization of meditative
practices. Metaphor and the Social
World, 7(1), 26–46.
Silvestre-López, A. J., Barrós-Loscertales, B., and D. Pinazo. (2021). Metaphor
can influence meta-thinking and affective levels in guided
meditation. Current
Psychology.
Skorczynska, H., and Ahrens, K. (2015). A
corpus-based study of metaphor signalling variations across three
genres. Text &
Talk 35 (3), 359–381.
Slobin, D. I. (1996). From
“thought and language” to “thinking for
speaking”. In J. J. Gumperz and S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking
linguistic
relativity, pp. 70–96. Cambridge: CUP.
Smith, T. H., and A. Beger. (2020). Conclusion:
when metaphors serve scientific
ends. In A. Beger and T. H. Smith (Eds.), How
metaphors guide, teach and popularize
science, pp. 297–318. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Soares da Silva, A. (Ed.) (2021). Figurative
language: Intersubjectivity and
usage. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Šorm, E., and G. J. Steen, G. J. (2013). Processing
visual metaphor: A study in thinking out
loud. Metaphor and the Social
World, 3(1): 1–34.
Sperber, D., and D. Wilson. (1995). Relevance:
Communication and cognition (2nd
ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
. (2008). A
deflationary account of
metaphors. In R. W. Gibbs, jr. (Ed.), The
Cambridge handbook of metaphor and
thought, pp. 84–105. Cambridge: CUP.
(1999a). Metaphor
and discourse: Towards a linguistic checklist for metaphor
analysis. In L. Cameron & G. Low (Eds.), Researching
and applying
metaphor (pp. 81–104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1999b). From
linguistic to conceptual metaphor in five
steps. In R. W. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor
in cognitive
linguistics (pp. 57–78). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2003). Conversationalization
in discourse: Stylistic changes in editorials of The Times between 1950 and
2000. In L. Lagerwerf, W. Spooren, & L. Degand (Eds.), Determination
of information and tenor in texts: Multidisciplinary approaches to discourse
2003 (pp. 115–124). Amsterdam & Munster: Stichting Neerlandistiek & Nodus Publikationen.
(2005). Basic
discourse acts: Towards a psychological theory of discourse
segmentation. In F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez and M. Sandra Pena Cervel (Eds.), Cognitive
linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary
interaction, pp. 283–312). Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2007). Finding
metaphor in grammar and usage: A methodological analysis of theory and
research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2008). The
paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model for
metaphor. Metaphor &
Symbol 23, 213–241.
(2009). From
linguistic form to conceptual structure in five steps: analyzing metaphor in
poetry. In G. Brone & J. Vandaele (Eds.), Cognitive
poetics: Goals, gains and
gaps, pp. 197–226. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2011a). What
does ‘really deliberate’ really mean? More thoughts on metaphor and
consciousness. Metaphor and the Social
World 1, 53–56.
(2011b). The
contemporary theory of metaphor – now new and
improved! Review of Cognitive
Linguistics 9(1), 26–64.
(2011c). From
three dimensions to five steps: The value of deliberate
metaphor. Metaphorik.de 21, 83–110.
Steen, G. (2011d). Genre
between the humanities and the
sciences. In: M. Callies, W. R. Keller, & A. Lohöfer (eds.), Bi-Directionality
in the Cognitive Sciences: Avenues, challenges, and
limitations, pp. 21–42. Amsterdam etc.: Benjamins.
Steen, G. J. (2013). Deliberate
metaphor affords conscious metaphorical
cognition. Journal of Cognitive
Semiotics 5 (1–2), 179–197.
(2016a). Mixed
metaphor is a case of deliberate
metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs, jr., (Ed.), Mixing
metaphor, pp. 113–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2016b). Sensory-motor
concepts and metaphor in
usage. In L. Strőbel (Ed.), Sensory
motor concepts in language &
cognition, pp. 85–108. Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.
(2017a). Deliberate
Metaphor Theory: Basic Assumptions, Core tenets, Remaining
Issues. Intercultural
Pragmatics 14(1), 1–24.
(2017b). Attention
to metaphor: where embodied cognition and social interaction
can meet, but may not often do
so. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor:
Embodied cognition and
discourse, pp. 279–296. Cambridge: CUP.
(2018). Conclusion. In G. J. Steen (Ed.), Visual
metaphor: Structure and
process, pp. 185–196. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2022). Metaphor
in The Cancer Poetry
project. In H. L. Colston, T. Matlock, and G. J. Steen (Eds.), Dynamism
in metaphor and
beyond, pp. 31–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A., and T. Krennmayr. (2010a). Metaphor
in usage. Cognitive
Linguistics, 21(4), 757–788.
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., Pasma, T. (2010b). A
method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to
MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Steen, G. J., Reijnierse, W. G., and C. J. Burgers. (2014). When
do natural language metaphors influence reasoning? A follow-up study to
Thibodeau and Boroditsky (2013). PLoS
ONE 9(12):
e113536..
Sternberg, R. J., & G. Nigro. (1983). Interaction
and analogy in the comprehension and appreciation of
metaphors. The Quarterly Journal of
Experimental
Psychology, 35(1), 17–38.
Stukker, N., Spooren, W., and G. J. Steen, G. J. (Eds.). (2016). Genre
in language, discourse and
cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Tay, Dennis. (2013). Metaphor
in
Psychotherapy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2016a). A
variational approach to deliberate
metaphors. Cognitive Linguistic
Studies 3(2), 277–298.
. (2017). The
nuances of metaphor theory for constructivist
psychotherapy. Journal of constructivist
psychology 30 (2), 165–181.
Thibodeau, P. (2016). Extended
metaphors are the home runs of persuasion: Don’t fumble the
phrase. Metaphor and
Symbol, 31(2), 53–72.
(2017). The
function of metaphor framing, deliberate or otherwise, in a social
world. Metaphor in the Social
World, 7(2), 270–290.
Thibodeau, P., and L. Boroditsky. (2013). Natural
language metaphors covertly influence
reasoning. PloS
ONE 8(1), e52961.
Thibodeau, P., and F. H. Durgin. (2008). Productive
figurative communication: Conventional metaphors facilitate the
comprehension of related novel
metaphors. Journal of Memory and
language, 58, 521–540.
Thibodeau, P., Fleming, J., and M. Lannen. (2019). In J. Perrez, M. Reuchamps, and P. H. Thibodeau (Eds.), Variation
in political
metaphor, pp. 177–194. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Thonus, T., & B. Hewett. (2016). Follow
this path: Conceptual metaphors in writing online center
consultations. Metaphor in the Social
World 6 (1), 52–78.
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., and H. Moll. (2005). Understanding
and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural
cognition. Behavioural and Brain
Sciences, 28, 675–735.
Urena Gómez-Moreno, Jose Manuel. (2016). Refining
the understanding of novel metaphor in specialised language
discourse. Terminology 22 (1), 1–29.
Van Berkum, J., Zwitserlood, P., Hagoort, P., & C. Brown. (2003). When
and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from
the N400 effect. Cognitive Brain
Research, 17, 701–718.
Van den Heerik, R., Van Hooijdonk, C., Burgers, C., & G. J. Steen. (2016). “Smoking
is sóóó… sandals and white Socks”: Co-creation of a Dutch Anti-Smoking
Campaign to Change Social Norms. Health
Communication.
Van den Heerik, R., Šorm, E., and G. J. Steen. (2018). Behavioral
evidence for
VISMIP. In G. J. Steen (Ed.), Visual
metaphor: Structure and
process, pp. 117–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Van der Hel, S., Hellsten, I., and G. J. Steen. (2018). Tipping
points and climate change: Metaphor between science and the
media. Environmental
Communication, 12(5), 605–620.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1995). On
macrostructures, mental models, and other inventions: A brief personal
history of the Kintsch-van Dijk
theory. In C. A. Weaver, III, S. Mannes, and C. R. Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse
comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter
Kintsch, pp. 383–410. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
(2011). Discourse
studies: A multidisciplinary
introduction. Vol. 1 and
2. London: Sage Publications.
Van Dijk, T. A., and W. Kintsch. (1983). Strategies
of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic press.
Van Poppel, L. (2020). The
relevance of metaphor in argumentation: Uniting pragma-dialectics and
deliberate metaphor theory. Journal of
Pragmatics, 170, 245–252.
Van Wolde, E. (2020). A
network of conventional and deliberate metaphors in Psalm
22. Journal for the Study of the Old
Testament, 44(4), 642–666.
Veale, T. (2020). Metaphor
as sign and
symbol. In J. Barnden and A. Gargett (Eds.), Producing
figurative expression: Theoretical, experimental and practical
perspectives, pp. 511–532. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wackers, D., Plug, H. J., and G. J. Steen. (2020). Violence
metaphors for cancer: pragmatic and symptomatic arguments
against. Metaphor and the Social
World 10(1), 119–138.
. (2021). “For
crying out loud, don’t call me a warrior” Standpoints of resistance against
violence metaphors for cancer. Journal of
Pragmatics, 174, 68–77.
Wagner, A. E. (2021). Metaphor
in professional counselling. The Professional
Counsellor, 7(2), 144–152.
Wan, W., and G. D. Low (Eds.) (2015). Elicited
Metaphor Analysis in Educational
Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wawrzyniuk, J. (2020). “That’s
the metaphor you’re going for?” Deliberate metaphor and
humor. Studies in Logic, Grammar and
rhetoric, 64(74), 183–204.
Whiteford Damerall, A., & R. T. Kellogg. (2016). Familiarity
and aptness in metaphor comprehension. The
American Journal of
Psychology, 129(1), 49–64.
Williams, A. (2015). Metaphor
as tools of enrolment: A case study exploration of the policy press release
genre in regards to the Alberta Super
Net. In J. B. Herrmann and T. Berber Sardinha (Eds.), Metaphor
in specialist
discourse, pp. 271–296. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Williams, J. N. (1992). Processing polysemous words in context: Evidence from interrelated menaings. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21, 193–218.
Wilson, D., and R. Carston. (2006). Metaphor,
relevance and the ‘emergent property’
issue. Mind and
Language, 21(3), 404–433.
Wolff, P., and D. Gentner. (2011). Structure
mapping in metaphor comprehension. Cognitive
Science, 35, 1456–1488.
Zhang, H., Zhengjun, L., and J. Shengxi. (2022). What
else besides war? Deliberate metaphors framing COVID-19 in Chinese online
newspaper editorials. Metaphor &
Symbol, 37(2), 114–126.
Zinken, J. (2007). Discourse
metaphors: The link between figurative language and habitual
analogies. Cognitive
Linguistics, 18(3), 443–464.
Zinken, J., Hellsten, I., and B. Nerlich. (2008). Discourse
metaphors. In R. M. Frank, R. Dirven, T. Ziemke, and E. Bernárdez (Eds.), Body,
language and mind. Volume 2: Socialcultural
situatedness, pp. 363–385. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Zlatev, J., Jacobsson, G., and L. Paju. (2021). Desiderata
for metaphor theory, the Motivation & Sedimentation Model and
motion-emotion
metaphoremes. In A. Soares da Silva (Ed.), Figurative
language: Intersubjectivity and
usage, pp. 41–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Aspects
of literary
comprehension. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.