Cover not available

In:The Language of Food in Japanese: Cognitive perspectives and beyond
Edited by Kiyoko Toratani
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 25] 2022
► pp. 319–343

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 11
Applying force dynamics to analyze taste descriptions in Japanese online columns

 | Middlebury College
Published online: 9 February 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.25.11abe
Abstract
This chapter analyzes taste descriptions, applying force dynamics (Talmy, 1988), which uses a schematic structure to characterize force relations. I extracted 90 descriptions from online food columns to examine causal interactions in which Food acts upon Taster or on another Food, to find that they can be classified into four basic force relations. The influenced entity can: undergo a change (caused); overcome a blockage (overcoming); be prevented from changing (blocked); or remain unchanged despite a force acting against it/her (persevering). The classification reveals that the caused pattern is predominant, indicating that Food or Taster tends to be conceptualized as a malleable entity that “gives in” to (another) Food.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Force dynamic patterns in food descriptions
  • 3.Data and methodology
    • 3.1Data
    • 3.2Methodology
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Overview
    • 4.2Food-on-food patterns: Food as an agonist
      • 4.2.1“Enhanced” (caused)
      • 4.2.2“Overflowing” (overcoming)
      • 4.2.3“Confined” and “supported” (blocked)
      • 4.2.4“Robust” (persevering)
    • 4.3Food-on-Taster: Taster as an agonist
      • 4.3.1“Affected” (caused)
      • 4.3.2“Managing” (overcoming)
      • 4.3.3“Trapped” (blocked)
      • 4.3.4“Patient” (perseverance)
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Response to Question 1
    • 5.2Response to Question 2
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
References (26)
References
Abe, S. (2007). Space, time, subjectivity and beyond: The cognitive semantic development of the Japanese marker te-shimau (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
(2016). An L2 corpus study of the Japanese grammatical marker -te-simau: An application of force dynamics. In K. Kabata & K. Toratani (Eds.), Cognitive-functional approaches to the study of Japanese as a second language (pp. 203–236). Boston, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, J., Enfield, N., Essegbey, J., & Kita, S. (2010). The macro-event property. In J. Bohnemeyer, & E. Pederson (Eds.), Event representation in language and cognition (pp. 43–67). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caballero, R. (2007). Manner-of-motion verbs in wine description. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(12), 2095–2114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Copley, B. (2019). Force dynamics. In R. Truswell (Ed.), Oxford handbook of event structure (pp. 137–170). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. (1991). Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: The cognitive organization of information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A. (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 56, 251–299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ikegami, Y. (1981). Suru to naru no gengogaku [Linguistics of “do” and “become”]. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jurafsky, D. (2014). The language of food: A linguist reads the menu. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kageyama, T. (1996). Dōshi imiron: Gengo to ninchi no setten [Semantics of verbs: The interface between language and cognition]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kawachi, K., Bellingham, E., & Bohnemeyer, J. (2018). Different types of causality and clause linkage in English, Japanese, Sidaama, and Yucatec Maya. Papers from the 18th National Conference of the Japanese Cognitive Linguistics Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2000a). Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000b). Force and emotion. In L. Albertazzi (Ed.), Meaning and cognition: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 145–168). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1990). The Invariance Hypothesis. In Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1): 39–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nabeshima, K. (2011). Nihongo no metafā. [Metaphors in Japanese]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nishimura, Y. (1998). Kōisha to shieki kōbun [Actors and causative constructions]. In M. Nakau & Y. Nishimura (Eds.), Kōbun to jishōkōzō [Constructions and event structure] (pp. 107–203). Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodman, J. (2018). The 2018 restaurants of the year. Food and Wine, 41(5), 63–89.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1976). Semantics causative types. In M. Shibatani (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: The grammar of causative constructions, 6, (pp. 43–116). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12, 49–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Toward a cognitive semantics, Volume I: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolff, P. (2007). Representing causation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 82–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolff, P., & Thorstad, R. (2017). Force dynamics. In M. R. Waldmann (Ed.), Oxford handbook of causal reasoning (pp. 147–167). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue