Cover not available

In:Sensory Experiences: Exploring meaning and the senses
Danièle Dubois, Caroline Cance, Matt Coler, Arthur Paté and Catherine Guastavino
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 24] 2021
► pp. 537–572

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 15
Free sorting task for exploring sensory categories

ORCiD logo with link
ORCiD logo with link
ORCiD logo with link
Published online: 1 December 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.24.c15
Article outline
  • 15.1Background
    • 15.1.1A shift from the psychophysical tradition
    • 15.1.2The task
    • 15.1.3Free sorting tasks in psychology and sensory sciences
    • 15.1.4Theoretical framework for free sorting task
    • 15.1.5Free sorting task for sensory experiences
  • 15.2Guidelines and recommendations
    • 15.2.1Modality-specific procedure of free sorting task
      • 15.2.1.1Instructions
      • 15.2.1.2Stimuli selection vs. “objects” to be sorted
      • 15.2.1.3Participants
    • 15.2.2Output analysis
      • 15.2.2.1Mathematical analysis
        • Clustering stimuli
        • Representing categories as additive trees
        • Representing categories as central partition
        • Clustering participants, or measuring inter-participant agreement
        • Going further
        • Within-group distance
        • Levels of categorization
        • Incomplete designs
        • Fuzzy boundaries
      • 15.2.2.2Verbal analysis
    • 15.2.3Reconnecting to physical description of stimuli
  • 15.3Conclusions: Interests of free sorting task
  • Notes
  • References
References (88)
References
Aiken, L. S., & Williams, T. M. (1973). A developmental study of schematic concept formation. Developmental Psychology, 8(2), 162–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arabie, P., & Boorman, S. A. (1973). Multidimensional Scaling of Measures of Distance Between Partitions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 10(2), 148–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ballester, J., Abdi, H., Langlois, J., Peyron, D., & Valentin, D. (2009). The Odor of Colors: Can Wine Experts and Novices Distinguish the Odors of White, Red, and Rose Wines? Chemosensory Perception, 2(4), 203–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 111 (3), 211–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barthelemy, J.-P. (1991). Similitude, arbres et typicalité. In D. Dubois (Ed.), Sémantique et cognition : Catégories, prototype et typicalité (pp. 205–224). Paris, France: Éditions du CNRS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barthelemy, J.-P., & Guénoche, A. (1991). Trees and representations of proximities. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berland, A., Gaillard, P., Guidetti, M., & Barone, P. (2015). Perception of Everyday Sounds: A Developmental Study of a Free Sorting Task. Plos One, 10(2). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blanchard, S. J., & Banerji, I. (2016). Evidence-based recommendations for designing free-sorting experiments. Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1318–1336. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boriskin, M. (2019). The categorization of environmental sounds. Unpublished honours thesis, McGill University.
Brenac, T. (2002). Méthodes de partition centrale appliquées à l’étude de catégories cognitives. In J. Poitevineau (Ed.), Arbres, Classes, Distances (Vol. 6, pp. 71–103). Paris, France: LCPE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B., & Lui, L. (1989). The primacy of age and sex in the structure of person categories. Social cognition, 7(3), 262–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brusco, M. J., & Cradit, J. D. (2005). ConPar: A method for identifying groups of concordant subject proximity matrices for subsequent multidimensional scaling analyses. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 49(2), 142–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cadoret, M., Lê, S., & Pagès, J. (2009). A factorial approach for sorting task data (FAST). Food Quality and Preference, 20(6), 410–417. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cance, C., & Dubois, D. (2015). Dire notre experience du sonore: Nomination et dénomination. Langue Française, 188(4), 15–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cartier, R., Rytz, A., Lecomte, A., Poblete, F., Krystlik, J., Belin, E., & Martin, N. (2006). Sorting procedure as an alternative to descriptive analysis to obtain a product sensory map. Food quality and preference, 17(7–8), 562–571. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chollet, S., Valentin, D., & Abdi, H. (2014). Free Sorting Task. In P. V. Tomasso & G. Ares (Eds.), Novel techniques in sensory characterization and consumer profiling (pp. 207–227). Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Courcoux, P., Qannari, E. M., Taylor, Y., Buck, D., & Greenhoff, K. (2012). Taxonomic free sorting. Food Quality and Preference, 23 (1), 30–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dubois, D. (2000). Categories as acts of meaning: The case of categories in olfaction and audition. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 1, 35–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dubois, D., & Fleury, D. (1994). From classification to cognitive categorization: the example of the road lexicon. In E. Diday, Y. Lechevallier, M. Schader, P. Bertrand, & B. Burtschy (Eds.), New approaches in classification and data analysis (pp. 25–35). Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faye, P., Brémaud, D., Daubin, M. D., Courcoux, P., Giboreau, A., & Nicod, H. (2004). Perceptive free sorting and verbalization tasks with naive subjects: an alternative to descriptive mappings. Food Quality and Preference, 15 (7), 781–791. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernandez, P., Nodet, R., & Guastavino, C. (2017). La perception visuelle des cidres de glace québécois en fonction de l’expertise de ses consommateurs. In 15ème Journée du Sensolier, Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gaillard, P. (2000). Étude de la perception des transitoires d’attaque des sons de steeldrums : particularites acoustiques, transformation par synthèse et catégorisation (PhD Thesis). Universite de Toulouse II – Le Mirail.
(2009). Laissez-nous trier ! In D. Dubois (Ed.), Le Sentir et le Dire (pp. 189–210). Paris, France: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giboreau, A., Guerrand, C. D. S., & Dubois, D. (2009). Décrire : Identifier ou catégoriser. In D. Dubois (Ed.), Le sentir et le dire (pp. 211–232). Paris, France: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giboreau, A., Navarro, S., Faye, P., & Dumortier, J. (2001). Sensory evaluation of automotive fabrics: the constribution of categorization tasks writing t=rules based on terminology. Food quality and preference, 12, 311–322. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1960). The concept of the stimulus in psychology. American Psychologist, 15 (11), 694–701. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilbert, A. N., & Greenberg, M. S. (1992). Stimulus selection in the design and interpretation of olfactory studies. In Science of olfaction (pp. 309–334). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giordano, B. L., Guastavino, C., Murphy, E., Ogg, M., Smith, B., & McAdams, S. (2011). Comparison of methods for collecting and modeling dissimilarity data: Applications to complex sound stimuli. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 46(5), 779–811. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grant, D. A., & Berg, E. (1948). A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in Weigl-type card-sorting problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38(4), 404–411. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guastavino, C. (2003). Etude sémantique et acoustique de la perception des basses fréquences dans l’environnement urbain (PhD Thesis). Université Pierre et Marie Curie.
(2006). The ideal urban soundscape: Investigating the sound quality of French cities. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 92(6), 945–951.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Categorization of environmental sounds. Canadian journal of experimental psychology, 61 (1), 54–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guastavino, C., Boriskin, M., & Fraisse, V. (n.d.). Cross-classification of environmental sound. submitted
Guénoche, A., & Garreta, H. (2000). Can we have confidence in a tree representation? In Proceedings of JOBIM (pp. 45–56). Montpellier (France).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gygi, B., Kidd, G. R., & Watson, C. S. (2007). Similarity and categorization of environmental sounds. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(6), 839–855. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hubert, L., & Arabie, P. (1985). Comparing Partitions. Journal of Classification, 2, 193–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hubert, L. J. (1977). Nominal Scale Response Agreement as a Generalized Correlation. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 30(1), 98–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huson, D. H., & Scornavacca, C. (2012). Dendroscope 3 — An interactive viewer for rooted phylogenetic trees and networks. Systematic Biology, 61 (6), 1061–1067. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jenkins, R., White, D., Van Montfort, X., & Burton, A. M. (2011). Variability in photos of the same face. Cognition, 121 (3), 313–323. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klatzky, R. L., Lederman, S. J., & Reed, C. (1987). There’s more to touch than meets the eye: The salience of object attributes for haptics with and without vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116(4), 356–369. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krieger, A. M., & Green, P. E. (1999). A generalized rand-index method for consensus clustering of separate partitions of the same data base. Journal of Classification, 16(1), 63–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kruskal, J. B. (1964). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 29(1), 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lawless, H., Sheng, N., & Knoops, S. S. C. P. (1995). Multidimensional scaling of sorting data applied to cheese perception. Food Quality and Preference, 6(2), 91–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lelièvre, M., Chollet, S., Abdi, H., & Valentin, D. (2008). What is the validity of the sorting task for describing beers? A study using trained and untrained assessors. Food Qualïty and Preference, 19(8), 697–703. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A., Sherman, S. J., & Uhles, A. N. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 223–246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacQueen, J. B. (1967). Some Methods for classification and Analysis of Multivariate Observations. In Proceedings of5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (pp. 281–297). University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maffiolo, V., Dubois, D., David, S., Castellengo, M., & Polack, J.-D. (1998). Loudness and pleasantness in structuration of urban soundscapes. In Proceedings of Internoise. Christchurch, New Zealand.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mantel, N. (1967). The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research, 27(2), 209–220.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marcotorchino, J.-F., & Michaud, P. (1982). Agrégation de similarités en classification automa-tique. Revue de Statistiques Appliquées, 30(2), 21–44.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moore, B. C. J. (2013). An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morel, J., Marquis-Favre, C., Dubois, D., & Pierrette, M. (2012). Road traffic in urban areas: A perceptual and cognitive typology of pass-by noises. Acta acustica united with acustica, 98(1), 166–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niessen, M., Van de Cruys, T., Cance, C., & Dubois, D. (2013). Sound and Noise in Sonic Environmental Studies: Comparing Word Meaning in Discourses of Community Noise and Soundscape Research. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 99(6), 853–862. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paté, A., Boschi, L., Dubois, D., Le Carrou, J.-L., & Holtzman, B. (2017). Auditory display of seismic data: On the use of expert’s categorizations and verbal descriptions as heuristics for geoscience. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141 (3), 2143–2162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paté, A., Boschi, L., Le Carrou, J.-L., & Holtzman, B. (2016). Categorization of seismic sources by auditory display: A blind test. International Journal on Human-Computer Studies, 85, 57–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paté, A., Lavandier, C., Minard, A., & Griffon, I. L. (2017). Perceived unpleasantness of aircraft flyover noise: Influence of temporal parameters. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 103(1), 34–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paté, A., Le Carrou, J.-L., Navarret, B., Dubois, D., & Fabre, B. (2015). Influence of the Electric Guitar’s Fingerboard Wood on Guitarists’ Perception. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 101 (2), 347–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Picard, D., Dacremont, C., Valentin, D., & Giboreau, A. (2003). Perceptual dimensions of tactile textures. Acta Psychologica, 114 (2), 165–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poitevineau, J. (2002). Arbres, classes, distances (Vol. 6). LCPE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Prendre ses distances : de l’usage raisonné (raisonnable) de quelques statistiques pour les arbres additifs. In D. Dubois (Ed.), Le sentir et le dire (pp. 255–277). Paris, France: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pruzansky, S., Tversky, A., & Carroll, J. B. (1982). Spatial versus tree representations of proximity data. Psychometrika, 47, 3–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Qannari, E. M., Cariou, V., Teillet, E., & Schlich, P. (2010). SORT-CC: A procedure for the statistical treatment of free sorting data. Food Quality and Preference, 21 (3), 302–308. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rae, A. W. M., Howgate, P., & Geelhoed, E. (1990). Assessing the similarity of odours by sorting and triadic comparison. Chemical Senses, 15(6), 691–699. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rand, W. M. (1971). Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66(336), 846–850. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenberg, S., Nelson, C., & Vivekananthan, P. S. (1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of personality and social psychology, 9(4), 283–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rouby, C., Schaal, B., Dubois, D., Gervais, R., & Holley, A. (2002). Olfaction, Taste & Cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rouby, C., & Sicard, G. (1997). Des catégories d’odeurs? In D. Dubois (Ed.), Catégorisation et cognition (pp. 59–81). Paris, France: Kimé.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Santosa, M., Abdi, H., & Guinard, J.-X. (2010). A modified sorting task to investigate consumer perceptions of extra virgin olive oils. Food Quality and Preference, 21 (7), 881–892. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sattah, S., & Tversky, A. (1977). Additive similarity trees. Psychometrika, 42(3), 319–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shepard, R. (1980). Multidimensional scaling, tree-fitting, and clustering. Science, 210 (4468), 390–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shulman, C., Yirmiya, N., & Greenbaum, C. W. (1995). From categorization to classification: A comparison among individuals with autism, mental retardation, and normal development. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104 (4), 601–609. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soufflet, I., Calonnier, M., & Dacremont, C. (2004). A comparison between industrial experts’ and novices’ haptic perceptual organization: A tool to identify descriptors of the handle of fabrics. Food quality and preference, 15(7–8), 689–699. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spinelli, S. (2018). Semiotics and Sensory Sciences: Meaning Between Texts and Numbers. In Quantitative Semiotic Analysis (pp. 75–100). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steinhaus, H. (1957). Sur la division des corps matériels en parties. Bulletins de l’Académie polonaise des Sciences, 4 (12), 801–804.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1951). Handbook of experimental psychology. Oxford, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Storms, G., Mechelen, I. V., & Boeck, P. D. (1994). Structural analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6(1), 43–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strelnikov, S., Collett, E., Gaillard, P., Truy, é., Déguine, O., Marx, M., & Barone, P. (2018). Categorisation of natural sounds at different stages of auditory recovery in cochlear implant adult deaf patients. Hearing Research, 367, 182–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torgerson, W. S. (1952). Multidimensional scaling: I. Theory and method. Psychometrika, 17, 401–419. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1965). Multidimensional scaling of similarity. Psychometrika, 30 (4), 379–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Towler, A. J., & Schneider, D. J. (2005). Distinctions among stigmatized groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(1), 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological review, 84 (4), 327–352. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tversky, A., & Gati, I. (1978). Studies of similarity. In E. Rosch (Ed.), Cognition and Categorization (pp. 79–98). Ney York, NY, USA: John Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
VanDerveer, N. J. (1979). Ecological acoustics: human perception ofenvironmental sounds (PhD Thesis). Cornell University.
Vogel, C. (1999). Etude sémiotique et acoustique de l’identification des signaux sonores d’avertissement en contexte urbain (PhD Thesis). Université Paris 6.
(2000). Les signaux d’avertissement : catégories et contextes d’émission. In D. Dubois (Ed.), Espaces sensoriels et formes lexicales (Vol. 4, pp. 51–76). Paris: LCPE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wedel, M., & Bijmot, T. (2000). Mixed tree and spatial representation of dissimilarity judgments. Journal of Classification, 17(2), 243–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wickelmaier, F. (2003). An introduction to MDS (Tech. Rep.). Aalborg, Denmark: Sound Quality Research Unit – Aalborg University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwicker, E., & Fastl, H. (1999). Psychoacoustics, facts and models (2nd ed.). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue