In:Sensory Experiences: Exploring meaning and the senses
Danièle Dubois, Caroline Cance, Matt Coler, Arthur Paté and Catherine Guastavino
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 24] 2021
► pp. 403–437
Chapter 11Subjects or participants?
Published online: 1 December 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.24.c11
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.24.c11
Article outline
- 11.1From what is concerned to who is involved
- 11.1.1Who are they in psychological research
- 11.1.1.1The APA Publication manual
- 11.1.1.2Who are they in experimental and cognitive psychology?
- 11.1.1.3Subjects and their names in cognitive research on perception
- 11.1.2Who are they in other scientific domains?
- 11.1.2.1Naming who is concerned in linguistics and anthropology
- 11.1.2.2Human, animals and otherness
- 11.1.1Who are they in psychological research
- 11.2Participants in exploring sensory experience
- 11.2.1Identifying who they are in exploring sensory experience
- 11.2.1.1In the visual domain
- 11.2.1.2In the auditory domain
- 11.2.1.3In the olfactory and gustatory domains
- 11.2.2Selecting subjects or defining participants?
- Sex, gender and sensory experiences
- Age or cultural practices at different ages?
- 11.2.2.1Previous knowledge and expertise: Who are the experts?
- Expert in what? Knowledges vs. experiences
- Number of participants: Small is beautiful
- 11.2.3Subjects + Researchers = A relation between Participants
- 11.2.3.1Interactions between individuals as beings or agents
- 11.2.3.2Relations between humans as socially situated agents
- 11.2.3.3Expectations and knowledges
- 11.2.3.4Shared expectations and intersubjective meaning
- 11.2.1Identifying who they are in exploring sensory experience
- 11.3Where epistemological prerequisites meet ethical concerns
Notes References
References (88)
American Psychological Association. (1984). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. Washington, DC, USA: American Psychological Association.
Ballas, J. (1993a). Interpreting the language of informational sound. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 83(3), 143–160.
Ballas, J. A. (1993b). Common factors in the identification of an assortment of brief everyday sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19 (2), 250–267.
Baude, O., & Guerin, E. (2019). Questions méthodologiques pour construire la “ville” à partir des eslos. In O. Baude et al. (Eds.), Les metropoles francophones europeennes en temps de globalisation (pp. 41–55). Paris: Classiques Garnier.
Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1969). Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press.
Bigand, E., & Poulin-Charronnat, B. (2006). Are we “experienced listeners”? A review of the musical capacities that do not depend on formal musical training. Cognition, 100(1), 100–130.
Candau, J. (2000). Mémoires et experiences olfactives : Anthropologie d’un savoir faire sensoriel. Paris, France: Presses universitaires de France.
Cleary, M., & Pisoni, D. B. (2001). Speech perception and spoken word recognition: Research and theory. In E. B. Goldstein (Ed.), Blackwell handbook of perception (pp. 499–534). Wiley.
Coler, M. (2014). A grammar of Muylaq’ Aymara: Aymara as spoken in Southern Peru. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.
Conklin, H. (1955). Hanunoo color categories. In D. Hymes (Ed.), Language in culture and society: a reader in linguistic and anthropology (pp. 189–192). New York: Harper & Row.
Coo, R., Kay, P., & Regier, T. (2005). The world color survey database. In H. Cohen & C. Lefevre (Eds.), Handbook of categorization in cognitive science (pp. 224–241). Oxford: Elsevier.
Coquery-Vidrovitch, C. (2003). Le postulat de la supériorité blanche et de l’infériorité noire. In M. Ferro (Ed.), Le livre noir du colonialisme (pp. 646–691). Robert Laffont.
Cuvier, G. (1817). Extrait d’observations faites sur le cadavre d’une femme connue à Paris et à Londres sous le nom de Vénus Hottentotte. Mémoires du Musée National d’Histoire Naturelle, 3, 259–74.
Davis, K., & Moore, W. (1945). Some Principles of Social Stratification. American Sociological Review, 10 (2), 242–249.
(2012). Que diraient les animaux si on leur posait les bonnes questions ? Paris, France: La Découverte.
Dubois, D. (1996). Matériels et consignes : un type de questionnement social dans la recherche expérimentale en psycholinguistique. In J. Richard-Zappella (Ed.), Le questionnement social (pp. 89–98).
Dubois, D., Bourgine, R., & Resche-Rigon, P. (1992). Connaissances et expertises finalisées de divers acteurs économiques dans la catégorisation d’un objet perceptif. Intellectica, 15 (3), 241–271.
Grinevald, C., & Bert, M. (2010). Linguistique de terrain sur langues en danger : locuteurs et linguistes (Vol. 35/36). Ophrys.
(2011). Speakers and communities. In P. K. Austin & J. Salla-bank (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of endangered languages (pp. 45–65). Cambridge University Press.
Grossen, M., Liengme Bessire, M. J., & Perret-Clermont, A. N. (1997). Construction de l’interaction et dynamiques socio-cognitives. In Pratiques sociales et médiations symbol-iques (pp. 221–247). Peter Lang.
Guérin, V., & Lacrampe, S. (2010). Trust me, I am a linguist! Building partnership in the field. Language documentation and conservation, 4, 22–33.
Hallam, S., Cross, I., & Thaut, M. (2016). The Oxford Handbook ofMusic Psychology (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Haudricourt, A. G., & Dibie, P. (1988). Que savons-nous des animaux domestiques? L Homme, 108, 72–83.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Noranyazan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 1–75.
Hobson, J. (2018). Venus in the dark: Blackness and beauty in popular culture (2nd ed. ed.). New York: Routledge.
Holley, A. (1994). Sensibilités chimiques. In M. Richelle, J. Requin, & M. Robert (Eds.), Traité de psychologie expérimentale (pp. 433–482). Paris, France: Presses universitaires de France.
Howes, D. (1991). The Varieties of Sensory experience: A source book in the Anthropology of the Senses. Toronto, Canada: Toronto University Press.
Hutchins, E. (2008). The role of cultural practices in the emergence of modern human intelligence. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 363(1499), 2011–2019.
Imbert, M., & De Schonen, S. (1994). Vision. In M. Richelle, J. Requin, & M. Robert (Eds.), Traité de psychologie expérimentale (pp. 342–432). Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.
Isaacs, E. A., & Clark, H. H. (1987). References in conversations between experts and novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116(1), 26–37.
Kay, P. (2006). Methodological issues in cross-language color naming. In C. Jourdan & K. Tuite (Eds.), Language, Culture and Society – Key Topis in Linguistic Anthropology (pp. 115–134). Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from [URL].
Kay, P., & Regier, T. (2007). Color naming universals: The case of Berinmo. Cognition, 102 (2), 289–298.
Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. Perspectives on socially shared cognition, 2, 63–82.
Lawless, H. T., & Heymann, H. (1998). Sensory evaluation of food: principle and practices. New York, NY, USA: Chapman & Hall.
Lévy, M., & Grossen, M. (1990). Contrat expérimental et acte de questionnement: deux illustrations empiriques de l’articulation entre processus et activité cognitive de l’enfant dans une situation de test piagétienne. Bulletin de psychologie, 44 (400), 229–238.
Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. (1996). Eyewitness testimony. In Introducing psychological research (pp. 305–309). Springer.
Lucy, J. (1997). The linguistics of “color”. In C. L. Hardin & L. Maffi (Eds.), Color Categories in Thought and Language (pp. 320–346). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MacLaury, R. E. (1997). Color and cognition in Mesoamerica: Constructing categories as vantages. University of Texas press.
Majid, A., & Kruspe, N. (2018). Hunter-gatherer olfaction is special. Current Biology, 28(3), 409–413.
Martin, C. (2010). Langage, patois et bilinguisme sensoriel en taille de pierre. Communications, 86(1), 157–173.
McAdams, S. (1994). Audition: physiologie, perception et cognition. In M. Richelle, J. Requin, & M. Robert (Eds.), Traité de psychologie expérimentale (pp. 283–344). Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.
Mithun, M. (2001). Who shapes the record: the speaker and the linguist. In P. Newman & M. Ratliff (Eds.), Linguistic Fieldwork (pp. 34–54). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mondada, L. (1999). L’accomplissement de l’étrangéité dans et par l’interaction: procédures de catégorisation des locuteurs. Langages, 134, 20–34.
Montgomery, S. (2009). Walking with the great apes: Jane goodall, dian fossey, biruté galdikas. Chelsea Green Publishing.
Moore, B. C. J. (2013). An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.
Morange, S. (2009). Expert ? Vous avez dit expert ? In D. Dubois (Ed.), Le sentir et le dire (pp. 137–157). Paris, France: L’Harmattan.
Morange, S., Dubois, D., & Fontaine, J.-M. (2007). Voices of Caruso: Cognitive evaluation and acoustic analysis of reedited editions. In K. Maimets-Volk, R. Parncutt, M. Marin, & J. Ross (Eds.), Proceedings of the third Conference on Interdisciplinary Musicology (CIM07). Tallinn, Estonia.
Mowat, F., & de Winter, R. (1987). Woman in the mists: the story of dian fossey and the mountain gorillas of africa. New York, New York, USA: Warner Books.
Niessen, M., Van de Cruys, T., Cance, C., & Dubois, D. (2013). Sound and Noise in Sonic Environmental Studies: Comparing Word Meaning in Discourses of Community Noise and Soundscape Research. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 99 (6), 853–862.
Paté, A., Boschi, L., Dubois, D., Le Carrou, J.-L., & Holtzman, B. (2017). Auditory display of seismic data: On the use of expert’s categorizations and verbal descriptions as heuristics for geoscience. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141 (3), 2143–2162.
Poitou, J., & Dubois, D. (1999). Catégories sémantiques et cognitives. Une étude expérimentale en sémantique lexicale. Cahiers de lexicologie, 74(1), 5–27.
Richelle, M., Requin, J., & Robert, M. (1994). Traité de Psychologie expérimentale. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.
Rozin, P. (2010). The weirdest people in the world are a harbinger of the future of the world. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 108–109.
Savic, I., & Lindström, P. (2008). PET and MRI show differences in cerebral asymmetry and functional connectivity between homo- and heterosexual subjects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(27), 9403–9408.
Schaal, B. (1988). Olfaction in infants and children: developmental and functional perspectives. Chemical Senses, 13(2), 145–190.
Schulte-Fortkamp, B. (2010). Soundscape and sound design — Tuning the new ecology using the expertise of people’s mind. Proc. Digital Audio Effects (DAFx-10).
Spinelli, S. (2018). Semiotics and Sensory Sciences: Meaning Between Texts and Numbers. In Quantitative Semiotic Analysis (pp. 75–100). Springer.
Spinelli, S., Masi, C., Dinnella, C., Zoboli, G. P., & Monteleone, E. (2014). How does it make you feel? A new approach to measuring emotions in food product experience. Food Quality and Preference, 37, 109–122..
Visser, W., & Falzon, P. (1988). Recueil et analyse de l’expertise dans une activite de conception: questions de méthode. Psychologie française, 33, 133–138.
Wathelet, O. (2006). Une expertise de sens commun : prendre en charge les odeurs domestiques. In (Vol. 12, pp. 15–18). Paris.
(2009). Anthropologie de la transmission des savoirs et savoir-faire sensoriels : étude de cas: la transmission d’un patrimoine olfactif à l’intérieur de la famille (PhD Thesis). Université Nice Sophia Antipolis.
Whiten, A., Goodall, J., McGrew, W. C., Nishida, T., Reynolds, V., Sugiyama, Y., … Boesch, C. (1999). Cultures in chimpanzees. Nature, 399(6737), 682–685.
