In:Sensory Experiences: Exploring meaning and the senses
Danièle Dubois, Caroline Cance, Matt Coler, Arthur Paté and Catherine Guastavino
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 24] 2021
► pp. 371–401
Chapter 10Questioning sensory experience
Published online: 1 December 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.24.c10
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.24.c10
Article outline
- 10.1Exploring sensory experience: Revisiting some oppositions
- 10.1.1Objective/subjective: A problematic couple
- 10.1.2Worlds of senses, and objectifying subjectivity
- Lure
- Introspection
- Material culture
- Language and languages
- 10.1.3Invariance between individual singularities and collective variations
- Variations as independent variables?
- Invariants and variations in data analysis
- 10.2Methodological implications and iterative processes
- 10.2.1Rephrasing the question
- 10.2.2An interdisciplinary roadmap
- 10.2.3Reducing complexity, but not too much
- 10.2.3.1Who is concerned? How to select the participants?
- 10.2.3.2You said “context”? Stimulations and stimuli
- 10.2.3.3The influence of instructions and tasks
- 10.2.3.4Results and data constitution
- 10.2.4Ecological validity for the constitution of meaning
Notes References
References (51)
Albert, M. N., & Avenier, M. J. (2011). Légitimation de savoirs élaborés dans une épistémologie constructiviste à partir de l’expérience de praticiens. Recherches qualitatives, 30 (2), 22–47.
Ares, G., & Varela, P. (2018). Methods in Consumer Research, Volume 1: New Approaches to Classic Methods. Woodhead Publishing.
Avenier, M. J., & Thomas, C. (2011). Mixer quali et quanti pour quoi faire ? Méthodologie sans épistémologie n’est que ruine de réflexion. In Journée de l’atelier méthodologie de recherche de l’AIMS. Caen, France.
Brunswik, E. (1943). Organismic achievement and environmental probability. Psychological Review, 50(3), 255–272.
(1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley, CA (USA): University of California press.
Brunswik, E., & Kamiya, J. (1953). Ecological cue-validity of “proximity” and of other gestalt factors. American Journal of Psychology, 66, 20–32.
Cance, C. (2017). From Musical Instruments as Ontological Entities to Instrumental Quality: A Linguistic Exploration of Musical Instrumentality in the Digital Era. In T. Bovermann, A. D. Campo, H. Egermann, S.-I. Hardjowirogo, & S. Weinzierl (Eds.), Musical Instruments in the 21st Century (pp. 25–43). Berlin: Springer.
Cassin, B., Apter, E., Lezra, J., & Wood, M. (2014). Dictionary of untranslatables: A philosophical lexicon. Princeton University Press.
Clark, H. H. (1973). The Language-as-Fixed-Effect Fallacy: A Critique of Language Statistics in Psychological Research. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 12 (4), 335–359.
Classen, C. (1993). Worlds of senses: Exploring the senses in history and across cultures. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
Delepaut, G. (2009). Questionner : comment et pourquoi ? Le choc des questions, le poids des mots ! In D. Dubois (Ed.), Le Sentir et le Dire : concepts et méthodologies en linguistique et psychologie cognitive (pp. 157–188). Paris, France: L’Harmattan.
Dubois, D. (2000). Categories as acts of meaning: The case of categories in olfaction and audition. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 1, 35–68.
(2009). Le Sentir et le Dire – Concepts et méthodes en psychologie et linguistique cognitives. Paris, France: L’Harmattan.
Fisher, L. E., & Werner, O. (1978). Explaining explanation: Tension in american anthropology. Journal of Anthropological Research, 34 (2), 194–218.
Goodenough, W. H. (1980). Description and comparison in cultural anthropology (Vol. 1968). CUP Archive.
Guastavino, C. (2009). Validité écologique des dispositifs expérimentaux. Pour qui ? Pour quoi ? Pour quoi faire ? In D. Dubois (Ed.), Le Sentir et le Dire (pp. 233–252). Paris (France): L’Harmattan.
Guastavino, C., Katz, B. F. G., Polack, J.-D., Levitin, D. J., & Dubois, D. (2005). Ecological validity of soundscape reproduction. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 50 (2), 333–341.
Guastavino, C., Paté, A., & Gaillard, P. (2017). Shafer and Schafer: When musicians promote scientific hypotheses on auditory perception. In Uncommon Senses II. Montreal, Canada.
Harris, M. (1976). History and significance of the emic/etic distinction. Annual review of anthropology, 5 (1), 329–350.
Koller, V. (2008). Not just a colour: pink as a gender and sexuality marker in visual communication. Visual communication, 7 (4), 395–423.
Köster, E., Moller, P., & Mojet, J. (2014). A “misfit” theory of spontaneous conscious odor perception (mitscop): Reflections on the role and function of odor memory in everay day life. Frontiers in Psychology, cognitive science, 5 (Special issue “Applied olfactory cognition”), 29–43.
Lautrey, J. (2003). La psychologie différentielle à l’épreuve de la variabilité intraindividuelle. In A. Vom Hofe, H. Charvin, J. Bernaud, & D. Guédon (Eds.), Psychologie differentielle: recherches et rélexions (pp. 9–28). Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
Lévy-Leblond, J.-M. (1996). Aux contraires, L’exercice de la pensée et la pratique de la science. Gallimard.
Lewin, K. (1939). Field theory and experiment in social psychology: concepts and methods. American Journal of Sociology, 44 (6), 868–896.
Locke, K. (2010). Abduction. In A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research. Sage.
Neisser, U. (1987). Concepts and conceptual development: ecological and intellectual factors in categorization. Cambridge, MA, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Paveau, M.-A. (2009). Mais où est donc le sens ? Pour une linguistique symétrique. In Res per nomen 2 (pp. 21–31).
Pelto, P. J., & Pelto, G. H. (1978). Anthropological research: The structure of inquiry. Cambridge University Press.
Pike, K. L. (1954). Emic and etic standpoints for the description of behaviour. ln: Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior-part 1. Glandale, Summer lnstitute of Linguistics, 135–41.
Reichertz, J. (2007). Abduction: The logic of discovery of grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 214–228).
Sammut, G., Daanen, P., & Sartawi, M. (2010). Interobjectivity: Representations and artefacts in cultural psychology. Culture & Psychology, 16(4), 451–463.
Spinelli, S. (2018). Semiotics and Sensory Sciences: Meaning Between Texts and Numbers. In Quantitative Semiotic Analysis (pp. 75–100). Springer.
Steffens, J. (2013). Realism and ecological validity of sound quality experiments on household appliances. In (pp. 132–135). Merano, Italy.
Steffens, J., Steele, D., & Guastavino, C. (2017). Situational and person-related factors influencing momentary and retrospective soundscape evaluations in day-to-day life. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141 (3), 1414–1425.
Vermersch, P., Martinez, C., Marty, C., Maurel, M., & Faingold, N. (2003). Étude de l’effet des relances en situation d’entretien. Expliciter. Journal du groupe de recherche sur l’explicitation, 49, 1–30.
Vogel, C. (1999). Étude sémiotique et acoustique de l’identification des signaux sonores d’avertissement en contexte urbain (PhD Thesis). Université Paris 6.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
