Cover not available

In:Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages: MIPVU around the world
Edited by Susan Nacey, Aletta G. Dorst, Tina Krennmayr and W. Gudrun Reijnierse
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 22] 2019
► pp. 227–245

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 11
Linguistic metaphor identification in Uzbek

 | , , TurkeyIstanbul Aydın University , Turkey
Published online: 28 November 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.22.11kay
Article outline
  • 11.1Introduction
  • 11.2Operational issues
    • 11.2.1Data collection
    • 11.2.2Dictionary use
  • 11.3Linguistic issues
    • 11.3.1Locative, dative and ablative cases
      • Locative markers
      • Dative markers
      • Ablative markers
    • 11.3.2Compound verbs
  • 11.4Sample analyses
  • 11.5Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
References (10)
References
Bodrogligeti, A. J. E. (2003). An academic reference grammar of modern literary Uzbek, Vol. 1–2. Los Angeles, CA: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clauson, G. (1972). An etymological dictionary of pre-thirteenth-century Turkish. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coşkun, V. (2000). Özbek Türkçesi grameri. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckmann, J. (1966). Chagatay manual. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gen, S. (2015). Özbekçede metaforlar [Metaphors in Uzbek]. Doctoral dissertation, Cukurova University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johanson, L. (2006). Uzbek. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics, Vol. 13 (pp.287–290). Oxford: Elsevier Science Limited. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merhan, A. (2008). Özbek dilinde betimleyici (deskriptif) eylemler [Descriptive verbs in Uzbek]. Journal of Turkish Studies (JTS/TUBA) 32(1), 367–383.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’zbekiston Respublikasi Fanlar Akademiyasi Alisher Navoiy Nomidagi Til va Adabiyot Instituti. (2006–2008). O’zbek tilining izohli lug’ati (I-V) [Comprehensive dictionary of Uzbek I-V]. Toshkent: “O’zbekiston Milli Entsiklopediyasi” Davlat Ilmiy Nashriyoti. [URL] kitoblar.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22(1), 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Falck, Marlene Johansson & Lacey Okonski
2022. Procedure for Identifying Metaphorical Scenes (pims): A Cognitive Linguistics Approach to Bridge Theory and Practice. Cognitive Semantics 8:2 ► pp. 294 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 april 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue