Cover not available

In:Representing Wine – Sensory Perceptions, Communication and Cultures
Rosario Caballero, Ernesto Suárez-Toste and Carita Paradis
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 21] 2019
► pp. 219–229

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

References

Published online: 21 October 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.21.refs
Anishchanka, A., Speelman, D., & Geeraerts, D. (2015). Usage-related variation in the referential range of blue in marketing context. Functions of Language, 22(1), 20–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aristotle. (1976). De anima (Hicks, Robert, Trans.). New York: Arno.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barrós-Loscertales, A., González, J., Pulvermüller, F., Ventura-Campos, N., Bustamante, J. C., Costumero, V., Parcet, M. A., & Ávila, C. (2012). Reading salt activates gustatory brain regions: fMRI evidence for semantic grounding in a novel sensory modality. Cerebral Cortex, 22(11), 2554–2563. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Grounded cognition: Past, present, and future. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 716–724. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bazerman, C. (1994). Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman, & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79–101). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benczes, R., Barcelona Sánchez, A., & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. (Eds.). (2011). Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergen, B., & Wheeler, K. (2010). Grammatical aspect and mental simulation. Brain and Language, 112(3), 115–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beveridge, M. E. L., & Pickering, M. J. (2013). Perspective taking in language: Integrating the spatial and action domains. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 577. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (2000). Genres in conflict. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Analysing professional genres (pp. 147–162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Binder, J. R., & Desai, R. (2011). The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(11), 527–536. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Binder, J. R. (2016). In defense of abstract conceptual representations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1096–1108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Black, M. (1979). More about metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 19–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolognesi, M., & Strik-Lievers, F. (2018) How language and image construct synaesthetic metaphors in print advertising. Visual Communication. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bosker, B. (2015). Is there a better way to talk about wine? The New Yorker. Acessed at [URL]
Brisard, F. (2002). The English present. In F. Brisard (Ed.), Grounding: The epistemic footing of deixis and reference (pp. 259–97). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bushdid, C., Magnasco, M. O., Vosshall, L. B., & Keller, A. (2014). Humans can discriminate more than 1 trillion olfactory stimuli. Science, 343, 1370–372. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caballero, R. (2003). Metaphor and genre. The presence and role of metaphor in the building review. Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 145–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Re-viewing space. Figurative language in architects’ assessment of built space. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Manner-of-motion verbs in wine description. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 2095–2114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Cutting across the senses. Imagery in winespeak and audiovisual promotion. In C. Forceville, & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 73–94). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Exploring the combination of language, images and sound in the metaphors of TV commercials. Atlantis, 36(2), 31–51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Genre and metaphor. Use and variation across usage events. In E. Semino, & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 193–205). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caballero, R., & Díaz Vera, J. (Eds). (2013). The embodied soul. Explorations into human sentience – Imagination, (e)motion and perception. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caballero, R., & Paradis, C. (2013). Perceptual landscapes from the perspective of cultures and genres. In R. Caballero, & J. Díaz Vera (Eds.), The embodied soul. Explorations into human sentience – Imagination, (e)motion and perception (pp. 77–105). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Making sense of sensory perceptions across languages and cultures. Functions of Language, 22(1), 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Verbs in speech framing expressions: Comparing English and Spanish. Journal of Linguistics, 53(2), 1–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caballero, R., & Suárez-Toste, E. (2008). Translating the senses. Teaching the metaphors in winespeak. In F. Boers, & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 241–260). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). A genre approach to imagery in winespeak. In G. Low, Z. Todd, A. Deignan, & L. Cameron (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world (pp. 265–287). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carroll, N. (1996). Theorizing the moving image. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charters, S. (2007). On the evaluation of wine quality. Questions of taste. In B. C. Smith (Ed.), The philosophy of wine (pp. 157–182). Oxford: Signal Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charles Spence and Qian Janice Wang (2015). Wine and music (II): can you taste the music? Modulating the experience of wine through music and sound Flavour (2015) 4:33 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Classen, C. (1993). Worlds of sense. Exploring the senses in history and across cultures. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Classen, C., Howes, D., & Synnott, A. (1994). Aroma. The cultural history of smell. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, G. (2001). The discourse of advertising. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croijmans, I., & Majid, A. (2016). Language does not explain the wine-specific memory advantage of wine experts. In A. Papafragou, D. Grodner, D. Mirman, & J. Trueswell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the Cognitive science Society (pp. 141–146). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruse, A. (2002). The construal of sense boundaries. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique, 12, 101–19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Danesi, M. (2006). Brands. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). What’s in a brand name? A note on the onomastics of brand naming. Names: A Journal of Onomastics, 59, 175–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Day, S. (1996). Synaesthesia and synaesthetic metaphors. Psyche, 2(32). Accessed at [URL]
Dean, D. L., & Forbes, S. L. (2016). Are customers having e-conversations about your wine? The importance of online discussion forums as electronic word of mouth for wine marketers. In G. Szolnoki, L. Thach, & D. Kolb (Eds.), Successful social media and ecommerce strategies in the wine industry (pp. 115–132). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demattè, M. L., Sanabria, D., & Spence, C. (2006). Cross-modal associations between odors and colours. Chemical Senses, 31(6), 531–538. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, J. (2003). Discourse and grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language. Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (pp. 47–87). Mahwah & London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, R. (2016). How to build a hot brand. Meininger Online. Available at [URL]. Last accessed 11/09/2017.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse. Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. G. Kristensen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives (379–402). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Multimodal metaphor in ten Dutch TV commercials. The Public Journal of Semiotics, I(1), 15–34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Pictorial and multimodal metaphor in commercials. In E. F. McQuarrie, & B. J. Phillips (Eds.), Go figure! New directions in advertising rhetoric (pp. 272–310). Armonk NY: ME Sharpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). The role of non-verbal sound and music in multimodal metaphor. In C. Forceville, & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 383–400). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Concluding observations and further research. Course in Pictorial and Multimodal Metaphor, lecture 8/8, in [URL]
(2016). Visual and multimodal metaphor in film: Charting the field. In K. Fahlenbrach (Ed.), Embodied metaphors in film, television, and video games (pp. 17–32). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.). (2009). Multimodal metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1969). L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freedman, A., & Medway, P. (Eds.). (1994). Genre and the new rhetoric. London: Taylor Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gärdenfors, P. (2014). The geometry of meaning. Semantics based on conceptual spaces. Cambridge, MA. MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gasnier, V. (2006). A taste for wine. London & New York: DK.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
George Lakoff and Mark Turner 1989. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2005). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (Ed.). (2016). Mixing metaphor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gluck, M. (2003). Wine language. Useful idiom or idiot-speak? In J. Aitchinson, & D. Lewis (Eds.), New media language (pp. 107–115). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goatly, A. (1997). The language of metaphors. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gonzalez, J., Barros-Loscertales, A., & Pulvermüller, F. (2006). Reading cinnamon activates olfactory brain regions. NeuroImage, 32, 906–912. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goode, J. (2016a). I taste red: The science of tasting wine. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016b). The social licence of wine. Paper presented at the 16th Australian Wine Industry Technical Conference (July 2016).
Grady, J. (1997). theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(4), 267–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guy, K. M. (1999). ‘Oiling the wheels of social life’: Myths and marketing in Champagne during the Belle Époque. French Historical Studies, 22(2), 211–239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermuller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41, 301–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hekkert, P. (2006). Design aesthetics: Principles of pleasure in design. Psychology Science, 48, 157–172.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herdenstam, A. (2004). Sinnesupplevelsens estetik. Vinprovaren, i gränslandet mellan konsten och vetenskapen. Stockholm: Stockholm dialoger.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hodge, R. (1990). Literature as discourse. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hommerberg, C. (2011). Persuasiveness in the discourse of wine: The rhetoric of Robert Parker. Växjö: Linnaeus University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hommerberg, C., & Paradis, C. (2014). Constructing credibility through representations in the discourse of wine: Evidentiality, temporality and epistemic control. In D. Glynn, & M. Sjölin (Eds.), Subjectivity and epistemicity. Stance strategies in discourse and narration (pp. 187–214). Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Howes, D. (2003). Sensual relations: Engaging the senses in culture and social theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Cultural synaesthesia: Neurological vs. anthropological approaches to the study of intersensoriality. Intellectica, 55, 156–87.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Postscript to Sensuous Cognition: The language of the senses. In R. Caballero, & J. E. Díaz-Vera (Eds.), 293–298.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, H. W., Lee, C. L., & Federmeier, K. D. (2010). Imagine that! ERPs provide evidence for distinct hemispheric contributions to the processing of concrete and abstract concepts. NeuroImage, 49, 1116–1123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 148–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaszczolt, K. M. (2009). Representing time: An essay on temporality as modality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefford, A. (2015). Jefford on Monday: Tasting notes – the shame of the wine world? Decanter (August 31). Accessed at [URL]
(2016). Jefford on Monday: Letter to a young wine taster. Decanter (May 30). Accessed at [URL]
Johnson, H., & Robinson, J. (2013). The world atlas of wine. 7th edition. London: Mitchell Beazley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keller, A. (2016). Philosophy of olfactory perception. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerren, A., Kyusakova, M., & Paradis, C. (2013). From culture to text to interactive visualization of wine reviews. In F. T. Marchese, & E. Banissi (Eds), Knowledge visualization currents: From text to art to culture (pp. 85–110). Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kimmel, M. (2010). Why we mix metaphors (and mix them well): Discourse coherence, conceptual metaphor, and beyond. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 97–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kramer, M. (2015). True taste: The seven essential wine words. Kennebunkport: Cider Mill Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kremer, L., & Ronneberger-Sibold, E. (Eds.). (2007). Names in commerce and industry: Past and present. Berlin: Logos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lacey, S., Stilla, R., & Sathian, K. (2012). Metaphorically feeling: Comprehending textural metaphors activates somatosensory cortex. Brain and Language, 120(3), 416–421. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1990). The Invariance Hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 39–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh. The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1986). Abstract motion. Proceedings of the twelfth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 12, 455–471. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Investigations in cognitive grammar. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langewiesche, W. (2000). The million-dollar nose. The Atlantic Monthly, 42–70. [URL]. Date of access 2 September, 2016.
Lehrer, A. (1975). Talking about wine. Language, 51(4), 901–923. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1978). Structures of the lexicon and transfer of meaning. Lingua, 45, 95–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1983). Wine and Conversation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Reprinted and expanded in 2009 by Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C., & Majid, A. (2014). Differential ineffability and the senses. Mind & Language, 29, 407–427. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linell, P. (1998). Discourse across boundaries: On recontextualizations and the blending of voices in professional discourse. Text, 18(2), 143–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy. Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Louwerse, M., & Connell, L. (2011). A taste of words: Linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words. Cognitive Science, 35(2), 381–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lynott, D., & Connell, L. (2009). Modality exclusivity norms for 423 object properties. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 558–564. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Modality exclusivity norms for 400 nouns: the relationship between perceptual experience and surface word form. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 516–526. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacLean, N. (2003). When words get in the wine: The search for adjectives. National Post at [URL]. Accessed on 10 November 2011.
Majid, A., & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.). (2011). The senses in language and culture [Special Issue]. The Senses & Society, 6, 1. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Majid, A., & Burenhult, N. (2014). Odors are expressible in language, as long as you speak the right language. Cognition, 130, 266–270. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Majid, A., Burenhult, N., Stensmyr, M., de Valk, J., Hansson, B. S. (2018). Olfactory language and abstraction across cultures. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society, 373, 1752. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matlock, T. (2004). The conceptual motivation of fictive motion. In G. Radden, & R. Dirven (Eds.), Motivation in grammar (pp. 221–248). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, E., & Ewing-Mulligan, M. (2006). Wine for dummies. New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCoy, E. (2005). The emperor of wine: The rise of Robert M. Parker Jr. and the reign of American taste. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McQuarrie, E., & Phillips, B. (Eds.). (2008). Go figure! New directions in advertising rhetoric. Armonk NY: ME Sharpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Messaris, P. (1997). Visual persuasion: The role of images in advertising. California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morgan, G., & Tresidder, R. (2016). Contemporary wine studies. Dancing with Bacchus. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morrot, G., Brochet, F., & Dubourdieu, D. (2001). The colour of odors. Brain and Language, 79, 309–320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Negro Alousque, I. (2015). Visual wine metaphor and metonymy in ads. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 173, 125–131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noble, A., Arnold, R., Buechsenstein, J., Leach, E., Schmidt, J., & Stern, P. (1987). Modification of a standardized system of wine aroma terminology. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 38(2), 107–109.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nossiter, J. (2004). Mondovino. Goatworks Films & Films de la Croisade.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Hara-Plotnik, A. (2016). Wine label design is more important than you think. Eater (Oct 12). Available at [URL]. Last accessed 11/09/2017.
Oberfeld, D., Hecht, H., Allendorf, U., & Wickelmaier, F. (2009). Ambient lighting modifies the flavor of wine. Journal of Sensory Studies, 24, 797–832. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Old, M. (2013). Wine: A tasting course. London & New York: DK.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olofsson, J., Hurley, R. S., Bowman, N. E., Bao, X., Mesulam, M., & Gottfried, J. A. (2014). A designated odor–language integration system in the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(45), 14864–14873. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paltridge, B. (1995). Working with genre: A pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 24, 393–406. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Discourse analysis. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Radden, G. (Eds.). (1999). Metonymy in language and thought. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. (Eds.). (2003). Pragmatic inferencing in metonymy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paradis, C. (2001). Adjectives and boundedness. Cognitive Linguistics, 12(1), 47–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004/2011). Where does metonymy stop? Senses, facets and active zones. Metaphor and Symbol, 19(4), 245–264. Reprinted in P. Hanks & R. Giora (Eds.), Metaphor and figurative language: Critical concepts in linguistics, (pp. 137–156). Amsterdam: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Ontologies and construals in lexical semantics. Axiomathes, 15, 541–573. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Configurations, construals and change: Expressions of degree. English Language and Linguistics, 12(2), 317–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009a). This beauty should drink well for 10–12 years: A note on recommendations as semantic middles. Text & Talk, 29(1), 53–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009b). Prime time: The middle construction in wine drinking recommendations. In R. Bowen, M. Mobärg, & S. Ohlander (Eds.), Corpus and discourse – and stuff (pp. 243–251). Gothenburg Studies in English 96. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Touchdowns in winespeak: ontologies and contruals in use and meaning-making. In M. Goded Rambaud & A. Poves Luelmo. (Eds.), Proceedings for the 1st congress on linguistic approaches to food and wine descriptions (p. 57–72). Madrid: UNED University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015a). Meanings of words. Theory and application. In U. Hass, & P. Storjohann (Eds.), Handbuch wort und wortschatz (Handbücher Sprachwissen-HSW Band 3) (pp. 274–294). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015b). Conceptual spaces at work in sensuous cognition: Domains, dimensions and distances. In P. Gärdenfors, & F. Zenker (Eds.), Applications of conceptual spaces: Geometric knowledge representation (pp. 33–55). Dordrecht: Springer Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paradis, C., & Willners, C. (2011). Antonymy: From conventionalization to meaning-making. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(2), 367–391. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paradis, C., & Eeg-Olofsson, M. (2013). Describing sensory perceptions: The genre of wine reviews. Metaphor & Symbol, 28(1), 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paradis, C., & Hommerberg, C. (2016). We drink with our eyes first. The web of sensory perceptions, aesthetic experiences and mixed imagery in wine reviews. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing metaphor (pp. 177–202). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parker, R. M. (2008). Parker’s Wine Buyer’s Guide. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peynaud, E. (1987). The taste of wine. London: Macdonald Orbis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez Sobrino, P. (2017). Multimodal Metaphor and Metonymy in Advertising. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Phillips, B., & McQuarrie, E. (2004). Beyond visual metaphor: A new typology of visual rhetoric in advertising. Marketing Theory, 4(1/2), 111–34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plümacher, M., & Holz, P. (Eds.). (2007). Speaking of colours and odors. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Popova, Y. (2003). ‘The fool sees with his nose’: Metaphorical mappings in the sense of smell in Patrick Süskind’s Perfume. Language and Literature, 12, 135–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Image schemas and verbal synaesthesia. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 1–26). Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: SAGE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prial, F. J. (1988). Wine talk. New York Times. (May 4). Accessed at [URL]
Pulvermüller, F. (2003). The neuroscience of language: On brain circuits of words and serial order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.-U. Panther, & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17–59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V., & Hubbard, E. (2001). Synaesthesia –A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(12), 3–34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohrer, T. (2007). Embodiment and experientialism. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 25–47). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rolls, E. (2008). Functions of the orbitofrontal and pregenual cingulate cortex in taste, olfaction, appetite and emotion. Acta Physiologica Hungarica, 95, 131–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rouby, C., Schaal, B., Dubois, D., Gervais, R., & Holley, A. (Eds.). (2002). Olfaction, taste and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibañez, F. J. 2000. “The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy”, in Barcelona, A. (ed). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 109–132.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
San Roque, L., Kendrick, K. H., Norcliffe, E., Brown, P., Defina, R., Dingemanse, M., Dirksmeyer, T., Enfield, N. J., Floyd, S., Hammond, J., Rossi, G., Tufvesson, S., van Putten, S., & Majid, A. (2015). Vision verbs dominate in conversation across cultures, but the ranking of non-visual verbs varies. Cognitive Linguistics 26(1), 31–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, L. M., & Batra, R. (Eds.). (2003). Persuasive imagery. A consumer perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shen, Y. (1997). Cognitive constraints on poetic figures. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(1), 33–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shen, Y. & Gadir, O. (2009). Target and source assignment in synaesthetic possessive constructions. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(2), 357–371. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shepherd, G. M. (2015). Neuroenology: How the brain creates the taste of wine. Flavour, 4(19). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication, 23, 193–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). ‘Cultural’ concepts and the language-culture nexus. Current Anthropology, 45(5), 621–652. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Old wine, new ethnographic lexicography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, 481–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sjöblom, P. (2016). Commercial names. In C. Hough (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of names and naming (pp. 453–464). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sjöblom, P., Ainiala, T., & Hakala, U. (2013). Names in the economy: Cultural prospects. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spence, C., Velasco, C., & Knoeferle, K. (2014). A large sample study on the influence of the multisensory environment on the wine drinking experience. Flavour, 3(8). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spence, C., & Wang, Q. (2015a). Wine and music (I): On the crossmodal matching of wine and music. Flavour, 4(34). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015b). Wine and music (II): Can you taste the music? Modulating the experience of wine through music and sound. Flavour, 4(33). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015c). Wine and music (III): So what if music influences the taste of the wine? Flavour, 4(36). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spence, C. et al. (2015). On tasty colours and colourful tastes? Assessing, explaining, and utilizing crossmodal. Flavour volume 4, Article number 23 (2015). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strik Lievers, F., & Winter, B. (2018). Sensory languages across lexical categories. Lingua, 204, 45–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suárez-Toste, E. (2007). Metaphor inside the wine cellar. On the ubiquity of personification schemas in winespeak. Metaphorik.de, 12, 53–64.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). One man’s cheese is another man’s music: Synaesthesia and the bridging of cultural differences in the language of sensory perception. In R. Caballero, & J. E. Díaz-Vera (Eds.), Sensuous cognition. Explorations into human sentience: Imagination, (e)motion and perception (pp. 169–191). Berlin: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1996). Fictive motion in language and “ception”. In P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 211–276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. I, Conceptual Structuring Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Temmerman, R., & Dubois, D. (Eds.). (2017). Food and terminology. Expressing sensory experience in several languages. Special issue of Terminology, 23(1).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teng, N. Y., & Sun, S. (2002). Grouping, simile, and oxymoron in pictures: a design-based cognitive approach. Metaphor and Symbol, 17, 295–316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tent, J. (2017). Out-of-the-blue names of paint colours. Names, 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thibault, P. (2004). Agency and consciousness in discourse. Self-other dynamics as a complex system. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B. (2005). Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ullman, S. (1945). Romanticism and synaesthesia: A comparative study of sense transfer in Keats and Byron. PMLA, 60(3), 811–827. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice. New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Velasco-Sacristán, M., & Fuertes-Olivera, P. (2006a). Towards a critical cognitive-pragmatic approach to gender metaphors in advertising English. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(11), 1982–2002. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Velasco-Sacristán, M. & Fuertes-Olivera, P. (2006b). Olfactory and olfactory-mixed metaphors in print ads of perfumes. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 217–252. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Viberg, Å. (1983). The verbs of perception: A typological study. Linguistics, 21(1), 123–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Verbs of perception. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher, & W. Raible (Eds.), Language typology and language universals (pp. 1294–1309). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Warren, B. (2006). Referential metonymy. Scripta Minora Regiae Societatis Humaniorum Litterarum Lundensis. Kungliga Humanistiska vetenskapssamfundet i Lund.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Willander, J., & Larsson, M. (2006). Smell your way back to childhood: Autobiographical odor memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13(2), 240–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winter, B. (2016a). The sensory structure of the English lexicon. PhD dissertation University of California, Merced. [URL]
(2016b). Taste and smell words form an affectively loaded and emotionally flexible part of the English lexicon. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(8), 975–988. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winter, B., Perlman, M., & Majid, A. (2018). Vision dominates in perceptual language: English sensory vocabulary is optimized for usage. Cognition, 179, 213–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1977). Remarks on colour. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whittock, T. (1990). Metaphor and film. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wochele, H., Kuhn, J., & Stegu, M. (Eds.). (2012). Onomastics goes business: Role and relevance of brand, company and other names in economic contexts. Berlin: Logos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yeshurun, Y., & Sobel, N. (2010). An odor is not worth a thousand words: From multidimensional odors to unidimensional odor objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 219–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, N. (2003). Synesthetic metaphor: A cognitive perspective. Journal of Literary Semantics, 32, 19–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zubek, J., Denkiewicz, M., Dębska, A., Radkowska, A., Komorowska-Mach, J., Litwin, P., Stępień, M., Kucińska, A., Sitarska, E., Komorowska, K., Fusaroli, R., Tylén, K., & Rączaszek, L. (2016). Performance of language-coordinated collective systems: A study of wine recognition and description. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zucco, G. M. 2007. The unique nature of a memory system. In Plümacher, M. & Holz, P. (eds.). Speaking of colours and odors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 155–165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. (2009). Mental simulation in language comprehension and social cognition. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 1142–1150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue