Cover not available

In:Perception Metaphors
Edited by Laura J. Speed, Carolyn O'Meara, Lila San Roque and Asifa Majid
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 19] 2019
► pp. 303–326

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 15
Metaphors of perception in Japanese Sign Language

 | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science & Tokyo Gakugei University
Published online: 21 February 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.19.15tak
Abstract
Perception metaphors have been examined by analysing the polysemy of perception verbs in spoken languages. This chapter explores instantiations of metaphors of perception in Japanese Sign Language (JSL). Here I propose that the locations of articulation of signs be considered meaningful units and analyse signs articulated on or near to the signer’s eyes, ears, and nose in JSL. There are some potentially polysemous signs that illustrate meaning extensions from vision to intellection, where signs articulated on the perceptual organs are understood through metaphor. These conceptual metaphors in JSL are compared to the polysemy of perception expressions in the dominant spoken language, Japanese.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Conceptual metaphors of perception
    • 1.2Iconic and metaphorical mapping in sign languages
    • 1.3Sign language phonology and location of articulation
  • 2.Data and methodology
    • 2.1Language profiles
      • 2.1.1The language profile of JSL
      • 2.1.2The language profile of Spoken Japanese
    • 2.2Data collection
      • 2.2.1Collection of JSL signs
      • 2.2.2Conceptual metaphors in spoken Japanese
  • 3.Vision verbs and signs articulated around the eyes
    • 3.1Basic vision verbs
      • 3.1.1SEE as movement of the eyeball and line of eye gaze
      • 3.1.2Transfield mapping from vision
      • 3.1.3Modification
    • 3.2Vision to cognition
      • 3.2.1Examine and find
      • 3.2.2Try
      • 3.2.3LEARN, BE_INTERESTED, CONCENTRATED ON
    • 3.3Semantic networks of meaning extension of vision verbs in spoken japanese and signs around eyes
  • 4.Audition and signs around the ears
    • 4.1The basic auditory signs
    • 4.2Young Deaf people change the location of articulation of idiomatic phrases from the ears to the eyes
  • 5.Smelling and signs on the nose showing negative evaluation
    • 5.1The basic verbs for smelling
    • 5.2Is the nose the location of evaluation?
  • 6.Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (37)
References
Cates, D., Gutiérrez, E., Hafer, S., Barrett, R., & Corina, D. (2013). Location, location, location. Sign Language Studies, 13(4), 433–461.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2014). Figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ichida, Y. (2010). Introduction to Japanese Sign Language iconicity in language. Studies in Language Sciences, 9, 3–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jarque, M. (2005). Double mapping in metaphorical expressions of thought and communication in Catalan Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 5(3), 292–316.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnston, T. A., & Schembri, A. C. (2007). Australian Sign Language (Auslan): An introduction to sign language linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kimura, H., & Ichida, Y. (1995) Rou bunka sengen: gengoteki shosusha to shite no rousha [A declaration of deaf culture: Deaf people as a linguistic minority], Gendai Shiso 23(3), 354–399.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2011). Recent developments in metaphor theory. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 11–25.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kusumi, T. (Ed.). (2007). Metaphor kenkyu no saizensen [Frontier of research on Metaphor]. Tokyo: Hitsuji-shobo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1993a). The contemporary theory of metapor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993b). The metaphor system and its role in grammar. In K. Beals, G. Cooke, D. Kathman, S. Kita, K.-E. McCullough, & David Testen (Eds.), CLS29: Volume 2 (pp. 217–241).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lane, H., Pillard, R. C., & Hedberg, U. (2011). The people of the eye: Deaf ethnicity and ancestry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lucas, C. (2003). The role of variation in lexicography. Sign Language Studies, 3(3), 322–340.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meir, I. (2010). Iconicity and metaphor: Constraints on metaphorical extension of iconic forms. Language, 86(4), 865–896.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nabeshima, K. (2011). Nihongo no metaphor [Metaphor in Japanese]. Tokyo: Kuroshio-shuppan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nakamura, K. (2006). Deaf in Japan: Signing and the politics of identity. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nihon-Shuwa-Kenkyuujo (Social Welfare Corporation National Sign Language Training Center) (Ed.). (2011). Shin Nihongo-Shuwa Jiten [New Japanese-Japanese Sign Language dictionary]. Tokyo: Chuo Houki Shuppan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Padden, C., & Humphries, T. (1988). Deaf in America: Voices from a culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Penner, M. (2013). The mouthing of verbs in Japanese Sign Language. M.A. thesis, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pietrandrea, P. (2002). Iconicity and arbitrariness in Italian Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 2(3), 296–321.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
San Roque, L. S., Kendrick, K. H., Norcliffe, E., Brown, P., Defina, R., Dingemanse, M., Dirksmeyer, T., Enfield, N. J., Floyd, S., Hammond, J., Rossi, G., Tufvesson, S., Van Putten, & Majid, A. (2015). Vision verbs dominate in conversation across cultures, but the ranking of non-visual verbs varies. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(1), 31–60.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandler, W., & Lillo-Martin, D. (2006). Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seto, K. (1995). Metaphor shikou [Metaphorical thought]. Tokyo: Kodansha.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaffer, B. (2012). Reported speech as an evidentiality strategy in American Sign Language. In B. Dancygier & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Viewpoint in language (pp. 139–155). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speed, L. J., & Majid, A. (2017). Dutch modality exclusivity norms: Simulating perceptual modality in space. Behavior Research Methods.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stokoe, W. C. (1980). Sign language structure. Annual Review of Anthropology, 9, 365–390.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: The mind-body metaphor in semantic structure and semantic change. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Takashima, Y. (2013). Gengo no Shintai-sei to Shukan-sei ni kansuru Kankaku-Chikaku Hyougen no Ninchi-teki Kenkyuu [A cognitive approach to sensory-perception expressions from embodiment and subjectivity of natural language]. PhD dissertation, Kyoto University, Kyoto.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tanaka, S. (1996). The polysemic structure of “miru (see)”. Gengo Kenkyu, 110, 120–142.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taub, S. F. (2001). Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vanhove, M. (2008). Semantic associations between sensory modalities, prehension and mental perceptions. A cross-linguistic perspective. In M. Vanhove (ed.), From polysemy to semantic change: Towards a typology of lexical semantic associations (pp. 163–215). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilcox, P. P. (2000). Metaphor in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilcox, P. P. (2004). A cognitive key: Metonymic and metaphorical mappings in ASL. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(2), 197–222.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilcox, S. (2004). Cognitive iconicity: Conceptual spaces, meaning, and gesture in signed language. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(2), 119–147.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilcox, S., & Wilcox, P. P. (2013). Cognitive linguistics and signed languages. International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics, 3(2), 127–151.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yamanashi, M. (1988). Hiyu to rikai [Metaphor and understanding]. Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yeshurun, Y., & Sobel, N. (2009). An odor is not worth a thousand words: From multidimensional odors to unidimensional odor objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 219–241.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue