In:Perception Metaphors
Edited by Laura J. Speed, Carolyn O'Meara, Lila San Roque and Asifa Majid
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 19] 2019
► pp. 165–184
Chapter 9Why do we understand music as moving?
The metaphorical basis of musical motion revisited
Published online: 21 February 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.19.09jul
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.19.09jul
Abstract
Although musical structure is commonly perceived as moving, its motivation remains a debated issue. Conceptual Metaphor Theory approaches assume that musical motion is motivated by conceptual metaphors like time is motion and change is motion. The current study aims to investigate whether these conceptual metaphors successfully describe musical motion. For the analysis, a corpus of 10,000 words taken from the genre of music criticism (academic musicology journals and newspaper concert reviews of classical music) was compiled and exhaustively analysed with respect to metaphorical expressions. The results suggest that whereas many motion expressions for music seem to be motivated by time is motion as well as change is motion, a number of instances may instead present cases of fictive motion.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Musical motion and Conceptual Metaphor Theory
- 2.1The enigma of musical motion
- 2.2A potential answer to the enigma of musical motion: Conceptual Metaphor Theory
- 3.Method
- 4.Results
- 5.Musical motion as fictive motion
- 6.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (37)
Adlington, R. (2003). Moving beyond motion: Metaphors for changing sound. Journal of the Royal Musical Association, 128(2), 297–318.
Antović, M. (2014). Metaphor about music or metaphor in music: A contribution to the cooperation of cognitive linguistics and cognitive musicology [Metafora o muzici ili metafora u muzici: jedan prilog za saradnju kognitivne lingvistike i kognitivne muzikologije]. In M. Stanojević (Ed.), Metaphors We Study: Contemporary Insights into Conceptual Metaphor [Metafore koje istražujemo: suvremeni uvidi u konceptualnu metaforu] (pp. 233–254). Zagreb, Croatia: Srednja Europa. [URL]
Bonds, M. E. (2010). The spatial representation of musical form. Journal of Musicology, 27(3), 265–303.
Caballero, R. (2007). Manner-of-motion verbs in wine description. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(12), 2095–2114.
Caballero, R. & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2015). From physical to metaphorical motion: A cross-genre approach. In V. Pirrelli, C. Marzi, M. Ferro (Eds.), NetwordS 2015. Word knowledge and word usage. Representations and processes in the mental lexicon, Conference Proceedings, Pisa, Italy, 155–157.
Clarke, E. (2001). Meaning and the specification of motion in music. Musicae Scientiae, 5(2), 213–234.
Cox, A. (1999). The metaphoric logic of musical motion and space. PhD Dissertation, University of Oregon.
(2016). Music and embodied cognition. Listening, moving, feeling, and thinking. Bloomington, In: Indiana University Press.
Eitan, Z. & Timmers, R. (2010). Beethoven’s last piano sonata and those who follow crocodiles: Cross-domain mappings of auditory pitch in a musical context. Cognition, 114(3), 405–422.
Evans, V. (2003). The structure of time: Language, meaning, and temporal cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2013). Language and time. A cognitive linguistics approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Grady, J. E. (1997). Foundations of meaning. Primary metaphors and primary scenes. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Guck, M. (1991). Two types of metaphoric transfer. In J. Kassler (Ed.), Metaphor. A Musical Dimension (pp. 1–12). Sydney: Currency Press.
Jandausch, A. (2012). Conceptual metaphor theory and the conceptualization of music. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of Students of Systematic Musicology, Montreal, Canada.
Johnson, M., & Larson, S. (2003). Something in the way she moves. Metaphors of musical motion. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(2), 63–84.
(2015). Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason. A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Marghetis, T. & Núñez, R. (2013). The motion behind the symbols: A vital role for dynamism in the conceptualization of limits and continuity in expert mathematics. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5(2), 299–316.
Matlock, T. (2004). The conceptual motivation of fictive motion. In G. Radden & K. U. Panther (Eds.), Studies in Linguistic Motivation (pp. 221–247). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Moore, K. E. (2014). The spatial language of time. Metaphor, metonymy, and frames of reference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pérez-Sobrino, P. & Julich, N. (2014). Let’s talk music: A corpus-based account of musical motion. Metaphor and Symbol, 29(4), 298–315.
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39.
Shove, P. & Repp, B. H. (1995). Musical motion and performance: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. In J. Rink (Ed.), The Practice of Performance (pp. 55–83). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T. & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Störel, T. (1997). Metaphorik im Fach. Bildfelder in der musikwissenschaftlichen Kommunikation. Tübingen, Germany: Gunter Narr Verlag.
Cited by (11)
Cited by 11 other publications
Huang, Jie
Trojszczak, Marcin
Tóth, Máté
Wadley, Phillip, Thora Tenbrink & Alan Wallington
Antović, Mihailo, Mats B. Küssner, Adrian Kempf, Diana Omigie, Sarah Hashim & Andrea Schiavio
Damian, Mihaela Marieta
Galac, Ádám
Galac, Ádám
2024. Bold colors, sweeping melodies, offensive smells. International Journal of Language and Culture 11:1 ► pp. 58 ff.
Matlock, Teenie
2022. Fictive motion in the wild. In Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 9], ► pp. 109 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
