In:Perception Metaphors
Edited by Laura J. Speed, Carolyn O'Meara, Lila San Roque and Asifa Majid
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 19] 2019
► pp. 1–16
Chapter 1Perception metaphors
A view from diversity
Published online: 21 February 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.19.01ome
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.19.01ome
Abstract
Our bodily experiences play an important role in the way that we think and speak. Abstract language is, however, difficult to reconcile with this body-centred view, unless we appreciate the role metaphors play. To explore the role of the senses across semantic domains, we focus on perception metaphors, and examine their realisation across diverse languages, methods, and approaches. To what extent do mappings in perception metaphor adhere to predictions based on our biological propensities; and to what extent is there space for cross-linguistic and cross-cultural variation? We find that while some metaphors have widespread commonality, there is more diversity attested than should be comfortable for universalist accounts.
Keywords: metaphor, abstract concepts, embodiment, sensory perception, hierarchy
Article outline
- 1.Metaphor and perception
- 2.Perception metaphor and directionality
- 3.Perception metaphor and diversity
- 4.Concluding remarks
Acknowledgements References
References (66)
Akpinar, E. & Berger, J. (2015). Drivers of cultural success: The case of sensory metaphors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(1), 20–34.
Ashley, R. (2004). Musical pitch space across modalities: Spatial and other mappings through language and culture. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (Vol. 72). Adelaide, Australia: Causal Productions.
Barsalou, L. W. (1999) Perceptual Perceptual symbol systems. Brain and Behavioral Science, 22(4), 577-609.
Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1964). Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1), 1–28.
Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106, 579–593.
Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.
Croijmans, I. & Majid, A. (2016). Not all flavor expertise is equal: The language of wine and coffee experts. PLoS ONE 5(5): e0155845.
Dingemanse, M. (2011). The meaning and use of ideophones in Siwu. Ph.D. Thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen.
Dingemanse, M., & Majid, A. (2012). The semantic structure of sensory vocabulary in an African language. In N. Miyake, D. Peebles, & R. P. Cooper (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2012) (pp. 300–305). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Dolscheid, S., Shayan, S., Majid, A., & Casasanto, D. (2013). The thickness of musical pitch: Psychophysical evidence for linguistic relativity. Psychological Science, 24(5), 613–621.
Evans, N. & Wilkins, D. (2000). In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language, 76(3), 546–592.
Geurts, K. L. (2002) Culture and the senses: Bodily ways of knowing in an African community. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gilead, M., Gal, O., Polak, M., & Cholow, Y. (2015). The role of nature and nurture in conceptual metaphors: The case of gustatory priming. Social Psychology, 46, 167–173.
Goldberg, R. F., Perfetti, C. A. & Schneider, W. (2006a). Perceptual knowledge retrieval activates sensory brain regions. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(18), 4917–4921.
Goldberg, R. F., Perfetti, C. A., & Schneider, W. (2006b). Distinct and common cortical activations for multimodal semantic categories. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 6(3), 214–222.
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (1999). Polysemy and metaphor in perception verbs: A cross-linguistic study. PhD Thesis. University of Edinburgh.
Idström, A. & Piirainen, E. (2012). Endangered metaphors. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
IJzerman, H., & Semin, G. R. (2009). The thermometer of social relations: Mapping social proximity on temperature. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1214–1220.
Jamrozik, A., McQuire, M., Cardillo, E. R., Chatterjee, A. (2016). Metaphor: Bridging embodiment to abstraction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 23(4): 1080–1089.
Johnson, C. (1999). Metaphor vs. conflation in the acquisition of polysemy: The case of see. In M. K. Hiraga, C. Sinha & S. Wilcox (Eds.), Cultural, psychological and typological issues in cognitive linguistics: Selected papers of the bi-annual ICLA meeting in Albuquerque, July 1995 (pp.155–170).
Kay, P., Berlin, B., Maffi, L., Merrifield, W. R., & Cook, R. (2009). The world color survey. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. (Ed.). (2015). The linguistics of temperature. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kousta, S. T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(1), 14–34.
Lacey, S., Stilla, R., & Sathian, K. (2012). Metaphorically feeling: comprehending textural metaphors activates somatosensory cortex. Brain and language, 120(3), 416–421.
Lakoff, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1987). The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 195–221). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Le Guen, O. (2011) Materiality vs. expressivity: The use of sensory vocabulary in Yucatec Maya. Senses & Society 6(1), pp. 117–125.
Lee, S. W., & Schwarz, N. (2012). Bidirectionality, mediation, and moderation of metaphorical effects: The embodiment of social suspicion and fishy smells. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(5), 737–749.
Levinson, S. C. (2000). Yélî Dnye and the theory of basic color terms. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 10(1), 3–55.
Levinson, S. C., Majid, A., & Enfield, N. J. (2007). Language of perception: The view from language and culture. In A. Majid (Ed.), Field Manual Volume 10 (pp. 10–21). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Levinson, S. C., & Majid, A. (2014). Differential ineffability and the senses. Mind & Language, 29(4), 407–427.
Lynott, D., & Connell, L. (2009). Modality exclusivity norms for 423 object properties. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 558–564.
(2013). Modality exclusivity norms for 400 nouns: The relationship between perceptual experience and surface word form. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 516–526.
Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 102(1), 59–70.
Majid, A., & Burenhult, N. (2014). Odors are expressible in language, as long as you speak the right language. Cognition, 130(2), 266–270.
Majid, A. & Levinson, S. C. (2011). The senses in language and culture. Senses & Society, 6(1), 5–18.
Majid, A., Roberts, S. G., Cilissen, L., Emmorey, K., Nicodemus, B., O’Grady, L., Woll, B., LeLan, B., de Sousa, H., Cansler, B. L., Shayan, S., de Vos, C., Senft, G., Enfield, N. J., Razak, R. A., Fedden, S., Tufvesson, S., Dingemanse, M., Oztürk, O., Brown, P., Hill, C., Le Guen, O., Hirtzel, V., van Gijn, R., Sicoli, M. A., & Levinson, S. C. (in press). The differential coding of perception in the world’s languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Matissof, J. A. (1978). Variational semantics in Tibeto-Burman: The ‘organic’ approach to linguistic comparison. Occasional Papers of the Wolfenden Society on Tibeto-Burman Linguistics, Volume VI. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for the Study of Human Issues (ISHI).
Moseley, R., Carota, F., Hauk, O., Mohr, B., Pulvermüller, F. (2012). A rol for the motor system in binding abstract emotional meaning. Cerebral Cortex, 22(7): 1634-1647.
Nakagawa, H. 2012. The importance of taste verbs in some Khoe languages. Linguistics 50(3), 395–420.
Olofsson, J. K., & Gottfried, J. A. (2015). The muted sense: Neurocognitive limitations of olfactory language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(6), 314–321.
O’Meara, C. & Majid, A. (submitted). Anger stinks in Seri: Olfactory metaphor in a lesser-described language.
Pecher, D., & Zwaan, R. A. (Eds.) (2005). The grounding of cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
San Roque, L., Kendrick, K. H., Norcliffe, E., Brown, P., Defina, R., Dingemanse, M., Dirksmeyer, T., Enfield, N. J., Floyd, S., Hammond, J., Rossi, G., Tufvesson, S., Van Putten, S., & Majid, A. (2015). Vision verbs dominate in conversation across cultures, but the ranking of non-visual verbs varies. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(1), 31–60.
San Roque, L., Kendrick, K. H., Norcliffe, E. & Majid, A. (2018). Universal meaning extensions of perception verbs are grounded in interaction. Cognitive Linguistics, 29(3), 371-406. .
Schaefer, M., Denke, C., Heinze, H. J., & Rotte, M. (2013). Rough primes and rough conversations: Evidence for a modality-specific basis to mental metaphors. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(11), 1653–1659.
Schmidt-Snoek, G. L., Drew, A. R., Barile, E. C., & Agauas, S. J. (2015). Auditory and motion metaphors have different scalp distributions: an ERP study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 126.
Schwager, W., & Zeshan, U. (2008). Word classes in sign languages: Criteria and classifications. Studies in Language, 32(3), 509–545.
Shayan, S., Ozturk, O., & Sicoli, M. A. (2011). The Thickness of pitch: Crossmodal metaphors in Farsi, Turkish, and Zapotec. Senses & Society, 6(1), 96–105.
Speed, L. J., & Majid, A. (2018). An exception to mental simulation: No evidence for embodied odor language. Cognitive Science, 42(4), 1146-1178.
(2017). Dutch modality exclusivity norms: Simulating perceptual modality in space. Behavior Research Methods, 49(6), 2204–2218.
Stone, R. M. (1981). Toward a Kpelle conceptualization of music performance. The Journal of American Folklore, 94(372), 188–206.
Surrallés, A. (2016). On contrastive perception and ineffability: assessing sensory experience without colour terms in an Amazonian society. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 22(4), 962–979.
Traugott, E. L. (1975). Spatial expressions of tense and temporal sequencing: A contribution to the study of semantic fields. Semiotica, 15(3), 207–230.
Vigliocco, G., Kousta, S. T., Della Rosa, P. A., Vinson, D. P., Tettamanti, M., Devlin, J. T., & Cappa, S. F. (2013). The neural representation of abstract words: the role of emotion. Cerebral Cortex, 24(7), 1767–1777.
Wilkowski, B. M., Meier, B. P., Robinson, M. D., Carter, M. S., & Feltman, R. (2009). “Hot-headed” is more than an expression: The embodied representation of anger in terms of heat. Emotion, 9(4), 464–477.
Williams, J. M. (1976). Synaesthetic adjectives: A possible law of semantic change. Language, 52(2). 461–478.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Staniewski, Przemysław
Tóth, Máté
EŞİM, İbrahim & Serhat ZAMAN
Kalda, Anu
BAŞ, Melike
SPEED, LAURA J.
Speed, Laura J. & Asifa Majid
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
