In:Visual Metaphor: Structure and process
Edited by Gerard J. Steen
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 18] 2018
► pp. 185–196
Chapter 8Conclusion
Published online: 6 December 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.18.08ste
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.18.08ste
Article outline
- 8.1Discussion of the research presented in this book
- 8.2Further research
References
References (19)
Gibbs, R. W. (Ed.) (2008). Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Giora, R. (2003). On our mind: Salience, context and figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding figurative language: From metaphors to idioms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hodiamont, D., Hoeken, H., Van Mulken, M. (This vol.). Conventionality in visual metaphor.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago [etc.], University of Chicago Press.
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39.
Schilperoord, J. (This vol.). Ways with pictures: Visual incongruities and metaphor.
Šorm, E. and Steen, G. J. (2013). Processing visual metaphor. Metaphor and the Social World 3(1), 1–34.
Ṧorm, E., and Steen, G. J. (This vol.). VisMIP: Towards a method for visual metaphor identification.
Steen, G. (2007). Finding metaphor in grammar and usage: A methodological analysis of theory and research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Steen, G. J. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model for metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241.
(2011). The contemporary theory of metaphor – now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9(1), 26–64.
(2017) Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic Assumptions, Core tenets, Remaining Issues. Intercultural Pragmatics 14(1), 1–24.
Steen, G. J., Dorst, L., Herrmann, B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). MIPVU: A method for linguistic metaphor identification in natural discourse. Amsterdam etc.: Benjamins.
Van den Heerik, R., Šorm, E., and Steen, G. J. (This vol.) Behavioral evidence for VisMIP.
Van Weelden, L., Maes, A. A., and Schilperoord, J. (This vol.). How visual form affects metaphorical conceptualization: The role of shape similarity.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Zurru, Elisabetta
2021. Chapter 11. “Your planet needs you”. In Language in Place [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 37],
Zurru, Elisabetta
2021. “Your planet needs you”. In Language in Place [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 37], ► pp. 209 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
