Understanding conversational implicatures in L1 and L2: 16. Figurative competence is better developed in L1 than in L2, or is it?

Bromberek-Dyzman, Katarzyna; Ewert, Anna

doi:10.1075/celcr.13.21bro

In:Cognitive Processing in Second Language Acquisition: Inside the learner's mind
Edited by Martin Pütz and Laura Sicola
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 13] 2010
► pp. 317–334

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

16. Figurative competence is better developed in L1 than in L2, or is it?

Understanding conversational implicatures in L1 and L2

Katarzyna Bromberek-Dyzman

Anna Ewert

Published online: 19 March 2010

https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.13.21bro

Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Order by:

Lenton-Brym, Ariella P., David A. Moscovitch, Vanja Vidovic, Elizabeth Nilsen & Ori Friedman

2018. Theory of mind ability in high socially anxious individuals. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping 31:5 ► pp. 487 ff.

Mewhort-Buist, Tracy A. & Elizabeth S. Nilsen

2017. Shy individuals’ interpretations of counterfactual verbal irony. Metaphor and Symbol 32:4 ► pp. 262 ff.

García, Omar, Anna B. Cieślicka & Roberto R. Heredia

2015. Nonliteral Language Processing and Methodological Considerations. In Bilingual Figurative Language Processing, ► pp. 117 ff.

[no author supplied]

2014. Pragmatic Competence and Relevance [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 245],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.