In:Asymmetric Events
Edited by Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 11] 2008
► pp. 261–281
14. Asymmetries in participial modification
Published online: 15 May 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.11.17lew
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.11.17lew
The paper focuses on differences in the construal relations between participial constructions as used postnominally and prenominally in English and Polish. Their meaning is taken to be a function of both conceptual content of an expression and its construal. It is assumed that construal principles involved in building alternate profiles of expressions determine their conceptualizations. Consecutive sections of the paper present a discussion of, first, present participle modification in English and Polish, then past participle modification in English and Polish and establish a system of cognitive contrastive parameters which can serve as tertium comparations in the analysis.
Keywords: adjective, aspect, conceptual content, construal, contrastive analysis, English, equivalence, figure/ground relations, grounding, modification (prenominal -, postnominal -), participle (passive -, past -, present -) Polish, profiling, scanning (sequential -, summary -), schematicity, tertium comparationis, verb, voice (active -,middle -, passive -)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Leung, Alex Ho-Cheong & Wim van der Wurff
2018. Anaphoric reference in Early Modern English. In The noun phrase in English [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 246], ► pp. 143 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
