Article published In: Concepts and Transformation
Vol. 9:2 (2004) ► pp.147–180
Making knowledge actionable
From theoretical centralism to distributive constructivism
Published online: 13 July 2004
https://doi.org/10.1075/cat.9.2.06gus
https://doi.org/10.1075/cat.9.2.06gus
All concepts applied in social research have two sources of meaning: other words and practical experience. Making knowledge (more) actionable implies increasing the emphasis on the practical. This increase, however, is no simple process to be carried through as a turnaround operation. Rather, the shift demands a process consisting of several steps, ranging from establishing dialogic relationships with other people to the development of “regions of meaning” where theory and practice can interact in new ways. The article traces and discusses one such process of development, drawing on experience over two decades from action research in Scandinavian working life.
Keywords: action research, dialogue, networks, regions
Cited by (13)
Cited by 13 other publications
Heiskanen, Tuula, Katri Otonkorpi‐Lehtoranta, Minna Leinonen & Hanna Ylöstalo
Starbæk Bager, Ann, Kenneth Mølbjerg Jørgensen & Pirkko Raudaskoski
2016. Dialogue and governmentality-in-action. In Studies of Discourse and Governmentality [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 66], ► pp. 209 ff.
Bradbury, Hilary
Ennals, Richard
Ennals, Richard
Ennals, Richard
Ennals, Richard
Ennals, Richard
Johnsen, Hans Chr Garmann, James Karlsen, Roger Normann & Jens Kristian Fosse
Dewulf, Art, Marc Craps, René Bouwen, Felipe Abril & Mariela Zhingri
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
