Article published In: Concepts and Transformation
Vol. 5:3 (2000) ► pp.321–348
The Relevance and Perversity of Psychodynamic Interventions in Consulting and Action Research
Published online: 19 March 2001
https://doi.org/10.1075/cat.5.3.04van
https://doi.org/10.1075/cat.5.3.04van
An attempt is made to clarify the nature and relevance of the psychodynamic perspective for the work of action researchers and organization consultants. Since this perspective is grounded in psychoanalytic theory and clinical psychology, some important distinctions need to be made between the various work-domains of the consultant/action researcher and the classic individual psychoanalytic session. The author argues that without explicit reference to observable data, interventions may in fact pervert rather than facilitate learning and development. This argument is illustrated by vignettes grouped together under: (a) questionable interventions in group-relations conferences, (b) self-reflections and interpretations as a cult, and (c) the individual in interaction with the group.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Gray, Barbara & Sandra Schruijer
Schruijer, Sandra G.L. & Leopold Vansina
Vansina, Leopold
Vansina, Leopold
Vansina, Leopold
Vansina, Leopold & Gilles Amado
Vansina‐Cobbaert, Marie‐Jeanne & Leopold Vansina
Prins, Silvia
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
