Article published In: Concepts and Transformation
Vol. 2:2 (1997) ► pp.189–202
The 'Unattainable1 Objects of Psychosociological Analysis
André Lévy | CIRFIP (International Center of Psychosociological Research, Formation and Intervention
Published online: 1 January 1997
https://doi.org/10.1075/cat.2.2.05lev
https://doi.org/10.1075/cat.2.2.05lev
During its (very brief) history, psychosociology has experienced many changes, affecting its methods as well as its goals. It has nevertheless held a place apart among the other social sciences. Its specificity rests not so much on the objects — groups, institutions, organizations — that it has chosen to study, as on the manner according to which they have been approached, linking field and theoretical work. As a result, a different view of these objects has evolved, if not their dissolution as such. Social organizations, in particular, have appeared as complex constructs defying any general definition and, thereby, any general theory. In return, they have been revealed as the locus of events, or processes, through which history, both individual and social, is in the making.
Keywords: Psychosociology, Object, process., Action Research, Institution/organization
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
