In:The Development of the Chinese Cleft Construction: A diachronic constructional approach
Fangqiong Zhan
[Constructional Approaches to Language 41] 2026
► pp. 145–158
Bibliography
Published online: 5 February 2026
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.41.refs
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.41.refs
Aijmer, K. (1997). I
think — an English modal particle. In T. Swan & O. J. Westvik (Eds.), Modality
in Germanic languages: Historical and comparative
perspectives (pp. 1–47). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Akmajian, A. (1970). Aspects
of the grammar of focus in English (Doctoral
dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Aldridge, E. (2009). Old
Chinese determiner zhe. In P. Crisma & G. Longobardi (Eds.), Historical
syntax and linguistic
theory (pp. 233–248). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Anttila, R. (2003). Analogy:
The warp and woof of cognition. In B. D. Joseph & R. D. Janda (Eds.), The
handbook of historical
linguistics (pp. 435–440). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Barðdal, J. (2008). Productivity:
Evidence from case and argument structure in
Icelandic. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Barðdal, J., Smirnova, E., Sommerer, L., & Gildea, S. (Eds.). (2015). Diachronic
construction
grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Batllori, M., & Hernanz, M. -L. (2011). Generative
diachronic syntax: Word order and information structure. Catalan Journal of
Linguistics, 10 (Special
Issue).
Beeching, K., Degand, L., Detges, U., Traugott, E. C., & Waltereit, R. (2009). Summary
of the workshop on meaning in diachrony at the conference on meaning in interaction, University of the West of England,
Bristol, April 23–25. Topic of IPra panel, Manchester, UK, July 2011.
Beijering, K. (2015). The
lexicalization–grammaticalization–pragmaticalization interface: The case of Mainland Scandinavian jeg
tror. In A. D. M. Smith, G. Trousdale, & R. Waltereit (Eds.), New
directions in grammaticalization
research (pp. 667–691). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Bergs, A., & Diewald, G. (Eds.). (2008). Constructions
and language change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(Eds.). (2009). Contexts
and constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bisang, W. (2010). Grammaticalization
in Chinese: A construction-based account. In E. C. Traugott & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Gradience,
gradualness and
grammaticalization (pp. 245–277). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Bohnemeyer, J., & Swift, M. (2004). Event
realization and default aspect. Linguistics and
Philosophy, 27(3), 263–296.
Börjars, K., Vincent, N., & Walden, G. (2015). On
constructing a theory of grammatical change. Transactions of the Philological
Society, 113(3), 363–382.
Brems, L. (2011). Layering
of size and type noun constructions in
English. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Brinton, L. J. (2008). The
comment clause in English: Syntactic origins and pragmatic
development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brömser, B. (1984). Towards
a functional description of cleft
constructions. Lingua, 62(4), 325–348.
Büring, D., & Križ, M. (2013). It’s
that & that’s it! Exhaustivity and homogeneity presuppositions in clefts (and
definites). Semantics and
Pragmatics, 6, 1–29.
Busse, B., & Möhlig-Falke, R. (Eds.). (2019). Patterns
in language and linguistics: Crossing the boundaries in interdisciplinary
discourse. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Bybee, J., Pagliuca, W., & Perkins, R. D. (1991). Back
to the future. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches
to
grammaticalization (Vol. II, pp. 17–58). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The
evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the
world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bybee, J. L. (2003). Mechanisms
of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In B. D. Joseph & R. D. Janda (Eds.), The
handbook of historical
linguistics (pp. 602–623). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
(1999). Fobenxingjijing zhong de “xu” he “zhe” [“Xu” and “zhe” in
Fobenxingjijing]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese
Language, 6], 440–444.
Cao, D. (2019). Shiwu hua he shitai — zai lun zizhi he zhuanzhi [Nominalization and state of affairs — a revisit to self-designation and
transferred-designation]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese
Language, 4], 345–374.
Chen, M. (2009). Some
issues about construction grammar. Foreign Language Education and
Studies, 5, 337–400.
Cheng, L. L. -S. (2008). Deconstructing
the shì…de construction. The Linguistics
Review, 25, 235–266.
Choi, K. T. (2006). Formation
of a Chinese cleft sentence. Paper presented at The 22nd North
West Linguistics Conference (NWLC 22).
Chomsky, N. A. (1970). Remarks
on nominalization. In R. Jacobs & P. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Readings
in English transformational
grammar (pp. 184–221). Ginn.
Chomsky, N. (1977). On
wh-movement. In P. W. Culicover, T. Wasow, & A. Akmajian (Eds.), Formal
syntax (pp. 71–132). Academic Press.
Colleman, T., & De Clerck, B. (2011). Constructional
semantics on the move: On semantic specialization in the English double object
construction. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Special
issue on Variation, Change, and Constructions, Cognitive
Linguistics, 22(1), 183–209.
Coussé, E., Andersson, P., & Olofsson, J. (2018). Grammaticalization
meets Construction Grammar: Opportunities, challenges and potential
incompatibilities. In E. Coussé, P. Andersson, & J. Olofsson (Eds.), Grammaticalization
meets Construction
Grammar (pp. 3–19). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2001). Radical
construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological
perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Smet, H. (2007). “For…
to-infinitives as verbal complements in late modern and present-day English: Between motivation and
change”. English
Studies, 88(1), 67–94.
(2013). Spreading
patterns: Diffusional change in the English system of
complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DeVeaugh-Geiss, J., Tönnis, S., Onea, E., & Zimmermann, M. (2018). That’s
not quite it: An experimental investigation of (non-)exhaustivity in clefts. Semantics and
Pragmatics, 11, 1–45.
Diewald, G. (2002). A
model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer & G. Diewald (Eds.), New
reflections on
grammaticalization (pp. 103–120). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Diewald, G., & Smirnova, E. (2010). Evidentiality
in German: Linguistic realization and regularities in
grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Dissel, H. (1999). Demonstratives:
Form, function and
grammaticalization. Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Diessel, H. (2019). The
grammar network: How linguistic structure is shaped by language
use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dong, X. (2004). Shi de jinyibu yufahua: you xuci dao cinei chengfen [The
further grammaticalization of shi: From an empty word to an interword element]. Dangdai Yuyanxue [Contemporary
Linguistics, 6(1)], 35–44.
Dowty, D. R., Wall, R. E., & Peters, S. (1981). Introduction
to Montague
semantics. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Eckardt, R. (2006). Meaning
change in grammaticalization: An enquiry into semantic
reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fang, M. (1995). Hanyu duibijiaodian de jufa biaoxian shouduan [The syntactic
ways to indicate contrastive focus in Chinese]. Zhongguo
Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese
Language, 4], 281–282.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2003). Polysemy
and conceptual blending. In B. Nerlich, V. Herman, Z. Todd, & D. Clarke (Eds.), Polysemy:
Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and
language (pp. 79–94). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Feng, C. (2000). Jindai
hanyu yufa yanjiu [Studies on Early Chinese
Grammar]. Jinan: Shandong Education Press.
Feng, S. (1993). The
copula in classical Chinese declarative judgment sentences. Journal of Chinese
Linguistics, 21, 277–311.
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. K. (1988). Regularity
and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let
alone. Language, 64, 501–538.
Fischer, O. (2007). Morphosyntactic
change: Functional and formal
perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2010). An
analogical approach to grammaticalization. In K. Stathi, E. Gehweiler, & E. König (Eds.), Grammaticalization:
Current views and
issues (pp. 181–220). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
(2018). Analogy:
Its role in language learning, categorization, and in models of language change such as grammaticalization and
constructionalization. In S. Hancil, T. Breban, & J. V. Lozano (Eds.), New
trends in grammaticalization and language
change (pp. 75–104). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Fried, M., & Östman, J. -O. (Eds.). (2004). Construction
grammar in a cross-language
perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Gildea, S., & Barðdal, J. (2023). From grammaticalization to diachronic Construction Grammar. Studies in Language, 743–788.
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions:
A construction grammar approach to argument
structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(2003). Constructions:
A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences, 7(5), 219–224.
(2006). Constructions
at work: The nature of generalization in
language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grice, H. P. (1969). Vacuous
names. In D. Davidson & J. Hintikka (Eds.), Words
and
objections (pp. 118–145). Dordrecht: Reidel.
(1981). Presupposition
and conversational implicature. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical
pragmatics (pp. 183–198). Academic Press.
Harris, A. C., & Campbell, L. (1995). Historical
syntax in cross-linguistic
perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1967. Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English. Parts 1 and 2. Journal of Linguistics 8: 3–58.
(1970). Language
structure and language function. In J. Lyons (Ed.), New
horizons in
linguistics (pp. 140–165). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Hashimoto, A. Y. (1969). The
verb ‘to be’ in Modern Chinese. Foundations of Language Supplementary
Series, 9(4), 72–111.
Haspelmath, M. (2004). On
directionality in language change with particular reference to
grammaticalization. In O. Fischer, M. Norde, & H. Perridon (Eds.), Up
and down the cline — The nature of
grammaticalization (pp. 17–44). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Heine, B. (2002). On
the role of context in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer & G. Diewald (Eds.), New
reflections on
grammaticalization (pp. 83–101). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F. (1991). Grammaticalization:
A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2002). World
lexicon of grammaticalization. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Heine, B., & Reh, M. (1984). Grammaticalization
and reanalysis in African
languages. Hamburg: Buske.
Heine, B., Narrog, H., & Long, H. (2016). Constructional
change vs. grammaticalization: From compounding to derivation. Studies in
Language, 40, 137–175.
Heine, B., Ziegeler, D., Basile, C. A., & Mélac, E. (2025). Grammaticalization vs. diachronic Construction Grammar. Studies in Language. Advance online publication.
Hilpert, M. (2008). Germanic
future constructions: A usage-based approach to
grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
(2013). Constructional
change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word-formation and
syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hilpert, M., & Gries, S. Th. (2016). Quantitative
approaches to diachronic corpus linguistics. In M. Kytö & P. Pahta (Eds.), The
Cambridge handbook of English historical
linguistics (pp. 36–53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hilpert, M. (2018). Three
open questions in diachronic construction grammar. In E. Coussé, P. Andersson, & J. Olofsson (Eds.), Grammaticalization
meets construction
grammar (pp. 21–39). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hilpert, M., & Östman, J.-O. (2014). Reflections on constructions across grammars. Constructions and Frames, 6(2), 137–142.
Himmelmann, N. (2004). Lexicalization
and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? In W. Bisang, N. P. Himmelmann, & B. Wiemer (Eds.), What
makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and
components (pp. 21–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hinterhölzl, R., & Petrova, S. (Eds.). (2009). Information
structure and language change: New approaches to word order variation in
Germanic. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hoffmann, S. (2005). Grammaticalization
and English complex prepositions: A corpus-based
study. London: Routledge.
Hong, C. (1958). Lun Nanbeichao yiqian de xici [The copula before Northern and
Southern Dynasties]. Yuyan Yanjiu [Studies on
Language, 2], 1–22.
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization (rev.
ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hsieh, C. -L. (1998). Focusing
construction in Mandarin Chinese: Cleft and pseudocleft sentences (Master’s
thesis). National Tsing Hua University.
Huang, C. -T. J. (1982). Logical
relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar (Doctoral
dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
(1998). Logical
relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. New York & London: Garland Publishing.
(2007). Thematic
structures of verbs in Chinese and their syntactic projections. Linguistic
Sciences, 4, 3–21.
Huang, G. W., & Fawcett, R. P. (1996). A
functional approach to two “focusing” constructions in English and Chinese. Language
Sciences, 18, 179–194.
Hüning, M., & Booij, G. (2014). From compounding to derivation: The emergence of derivational affixes through constructionalization. Folia Linguistica, 48(2), 579–604.
Israel, M. (1996). The
way constructions grow. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual
structure, discourse and
language (pp. 217–230). Stanford: CSLI.
Itkonen, E. (2005). Analogy
as structure and
process. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Jackendoff, R., & Audring, J. (2016). Morphological
schemas: Theoretical and psycholinguistic issues. The Mental
Lexicon, 11(3), 467–493.
Jiang, L. (1999). Chusuoci de linggeyongfa he jiegouzhuci de de youlai [Another
function of the locatives and the origin of the structural particle de]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese
Language, 2], 83–94.
Jin, P. (2017). Study
on the format and semantic functions of the Chinese “(shi) VO de” and “(shi) V de O” sentences (Ph.D.
dissertation). Kanazawa University, Japan.
Kahn, C. H. (1973). The
verb ‘be’ in Ancient Greek. In J. W. M. Verhaar (Ed.), The
verb ‘be’ and its
synonyms (Vol. 6). Dordrecht: Reidel.
(2012). Grammaticalization
as optimization. In D. Jonas, J. Whitman, & A. Garrett (Eds.), Grammatical
change: Origins, nature,
outcomes (pp. 15–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kroch, A. (1974). The
semantics of scope in English (Ph.D.
dissertation). MIT.
Kuno, S., & Wongkhomthong, P. (1981). Characterizational
and identificational sentences in Thai. Studies in
Language, 5, 65–109.
Kuteva, T. (2001). Auxiliation:
An enquiry into the nature of
grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information
structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1977). Syntactic
reanalysis. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Mechanisms
of syntactic
change (pp. 57–139). Austin: University of Texas Press.
(2005). Construction
grammars: Cognitive, radical, and less so. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibañez & M. S. Peña Cervel (Eds.), Cognitive
linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary
interaction (pp. 101–159). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
LaPolla, R. (1995). Pragmatic
relations and word order in Chinese. In P. Dowing & M. Noonan (Eds.), Word
order in
discourse (pp. 297–329). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, C., & Smith, N. (2009). Change
in contemporary English: A grammatical
study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lehmann, C. (1985). Grammaticalization:
Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e
Stile, 20, 303–318.
(1995). Thoughts
on grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom Europa. (2nd rev. ed. of Thoughts on
grammaticalization: A programmatic sketch, 1982)
(2002). New
reflections on grammaticalization and lexicalization. In I. Wischer & G. Diewald (Eds.), New
reflections on
grammaticalization (pp. 1–18). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
(2004). Theory
and method in grammaticalization. Zeitschrift für Germanistische
Linguistik, 32, 152–187.
(2008). Information
structure and grammaticalization. In E. Seoane & M. J. López-Couso (Eds.), in
collaboration with T. Fanego, Theoretical
and empirical issues in
grammaticalization (pp. 207–229). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
(2015). Thoughts
on grammaticalization (3rd ed.; Classics in
Linguistics, Vol. 1). Language Science Press.
(2000). Presumptive
meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1976). Subject
and topic: A new typology. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject
and
topic (pp. 458–489). New York: Academic Press.
(1977). A
mechanism for the development of copula morphemes. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Mechanisms
of syntactic
change (pp. 419–444). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Li, C. N., Thompson, S. A., & Zhang, B. (1998). Cong huayu jiaodu lunzheng yuqi ci de [Evidence of
de as a modal particle from the perspective of discourse]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese
Language, 2], 102–132.
Li, K. (2008). Contrastive
focus structure in Mandarin Chinese. In M. K. M. Chan & H. Kang (Eds.), Proceedings
of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-20), Vol.
2 (pp. 759–774). Columbus: The Ohio State University.
Lien, C. (2009). The
focus marker si and lexicalization of simih into ‘what’ wh-words in earlier Southern Min
texts. Language and
Linguistics, 10(4), 745–764.
Ling, B. (2008). Juwei ‘de’ de jufa yuyong fenxi [The syntactic and pragmatic
analysis of the sentence-final de]. Yuwen
Xuekai [Journal of Chinese
Languages], 9, 87–102.
Liu, Y., & Cheng, G. (2021). Cong jiaodian leixing kan dezi jiegou de yuyi [The semantics
of the “de” construction from the perspective of focus types]. Zhongguo
Yuwen [Chinese
Language], 1, 28–42.
Liu, Y., & Shi, W. (2021). Verum
shi, sentence-final de and the emphatic effects in
Mandarin. Lingua, 267, 1–19.
Liu, Y., & Li, B. (2019). Qiongjinxing haishi duibixing — Cong yingyu fenlieju kan Hanyu jiaodianlei ‘shi’ ziju de
yuyi [Exhaustivity or contrastivity? A comparative study of the semantics of
Mandarin shi sentences and English it-clefts]. Waiyu Jiaoxue yu
Yanjiu [Foreign Language Teaching and
Research, 51(5)], 677–688.
Long, H. (2011). Cong jiaodian buquedingxing kan ‘ta shi toude zancheng piao’ jushi [On the N1 shi V de N2 structure in Chinese]. Hanyu Xuebao [Chinese
Linguistics, 2], 71–77.
Long, H., & Kuang, P. (2017). Modern
Chinese confirmative shi: Auxiliary or adverb? Functions of
Language, 24(3), 294–318.
Long, H., & Xiao, X. (2012). ‘Wo shi zuotian mai de piao’ jushi ji xiangguan wenti [On the
structure of N1 shi V de N2]. Shijie Hanyu
Jiaoxue [Chinese Teaching in the
World, 25(3)], 305–317.
Lorenz, D. (2013). Contractions
of English semi-modals: The emancipating effect of
frequency. Freiburg: Rombach.
Lü, S. X. (1942). Zhongguo wenfa yaolue [A concise grammar of
Chinese]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Lü, S. (1979). Hanyu yufa fenxi wenti [The grammatical analysis of
Chinese]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
(1984). Lun di, de zhi bian ji di zi de youlai [A
study on the debate on di and de, and the origin of
di]. In S. Lü (Ed.), Hanyu yufa lunwenji [Collection of the articles on Chinese
grammar]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
(2002). Lü Shuxiang quanji [The selective works from Lü
Shuxiang]. Shenyang: Liaoning Jiaoyu Chubanshe.
Mei, Z. (1988). Ciwei di, de de laiyuan [The origin of the
word–final di and de]. Shiyusuo
Jikan [Articles from the Institute of Historical
Linguistics, 59(1)], 141–172.
Meillet, A. (1958
[1912]). L’évolution des formes
grammaticales. In A. Meillet, Linguistique
historique et linguistique
générale (pp. 130–148). Paris: Champion. (Originally
published in Scientia (Rivista di
scienza), XXII, 1912)
Montague, R. (1973). The
proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In K. J. J. Hintikka, J. M. E. Moravcsik, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Approaches
to natural
language (pp. 221–242). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Narrog, H., & Heine, B. (Eds.). (2011). The
Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Noël, D. (2007). Diachronic
construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of
Language, 14, 177–202.
(2008). The
nominative and infinitive in Late Modern English: A diachronic constructionist
approach. Journal of English
Linguistics, 36(4), 314–340.
Noël, D., & Colleman, T. (2010). Believe-type
raising-to-object and raising-to-subject verbs in English and Dutch: A contrastive investigation in diachronic construction
grammar. International Journal of Corpus
Linguistics, 15(2), 157–182.
Norde, M., & Morris, C. (2018). Derivation
without category change: A network-based analysis of diminutive prefixoids in
Dutch. In K. Van Goethem et al. (Eds.), Category change from
a constructional
perspective (pp. 47–90). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ota, T. (1987). Zhongguo lishi wenfa [The historical grammar of
Chinese]. Beijing: Beijing University Press.
Paris, M. -C. (1979). Nominalization
in Mandarin Chinese. Paris: Département de Recherches Linguistiques, Université Paris VII.
Partee, B. H. (1999). Copula
inversion puzzles in English and Russian. In K. Dziwirek, H. Coats, & C. Jourdan (Eds.), Annual
workshop on formal approaches to Slavic
linguistics (pp. 155–176). Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publishers.
Patten, A. L. (2010). Cleft
sentences, construction grammar and grammaticalization (PhD
dissertation). University of Edinburgh.
(2012). The
English IT-cleft: A constructional account and a diachronic
investigation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Paul, W., & Whitman, J. (2008). Shi…de
focus clefts in Mandarin Chinese. The Linguistic
Review, 25(3–4), 413–451.
Peng, R. (2013). A
diachronic construction grammar account of the Chinese cause-complement pivotal
construction. Language
Sciences, 40, 53–79.
Perek, F. (2020). Productivity
and schematicity in constructional change. In B. Hilpert & A. Sommerer (Eds.), Nodes
and networks in diachronic construction
grammar (pp. 141–166). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Petré, P. (2014). Constructions
and environments: Copular, passive and related
constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peyraube, A., & Wiebusch, T. (1994). Problems
relating to the history of different copulas in ancient
Chinese. In M. Y. Chen & O. J. L. Tseng (Eds.), In honor
of William S. -Y. Wang: Interdisciplinary
studies on language and language
change (pp. 383–404). Taipei: Pyramid Press.
Pines, Y. (2002). Lexical
changes in Zhanguo texts. Journal of the American Oriental
Society, 122(4), 691–705.
Pijpops, D., De Smet, I., & Van de Velde, F. (2018). Constructional
contamination in morphology and syntax: Four case studies. Constructions and
Frames, 10(2), 269–305.
Pustet, R. (2003). Copulas:
Universals in the categorization of the lexicon. New York: Oxford University Press.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A
comprehensive grammar of the English language. London & New York: Longman.
Repp, S. (2016). Contrast:
Dissecting an elusive information-structural notion and its role in
grammar. In C. Féry & S. Ishihara (Eds.), Interfaces
and interface conditions in
grammar (pp. 270–289).
Sag, I. A. (2012). Sign-based
construction grammar: An informal synopsis. In H. C. Boas & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Sign-based
construction grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
de Saussure, F. (1983). Course
in general linguistics (C. Bally & A. Sechehaye, Eds.; R. Harris, Trans.). London: Duckworth.
Schmid, H. -J. (2014). Lexico-grammatical
patterns, pragmatic associations and discourse frequency. In T. Herbst, H. -J. Schmid, & S. Faulhaber (Eds.), Constructions,
collocations,
patterns (pp. 239–293). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Shen, J. (2008). Moving
what? On emotional movement in ta shi qunian sheng de haizi. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese
Language, 326], 387–395.
Shi, D. (1994). The
nature of Chinese emphatic sentences. Journal of East Asian
Linguistics, 3, 81–100.
Shi, Y., & Li, N. (2001). Hanyu yufahua de lichen — xingtai jufa fazhan de dongyin he jizhi [The process of Chinese grammaticalization: The motivation and mechanism of the morphosyntactic
development]. Beijing: Beijing University Press.
Simpson, A., & Wu, Z. (2002). From
D to T: Determiner incorporation and the creation of tense. Journal of East Asian
Linguistics, 11(2), 169–209.
Sommerer, L., & Smirnova, E. (Eds.). (2020). Nodes
and networks in diachronic construction grammar. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Sommerer, L., & Van de Velde, F. (2025). Constructional
networks. In M. Fried & K. Nikiforidou (Eds.), The
Cambridge handbook of construction
grammar (pp. 220–246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Song, Y. (1981). Guanyu shijian zhuci ‘de’ he ‘laizhe’ [About the temporal
particle ‘de’ and ‘laizhe’]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese
Language, 4], 275–289.
Stowell, T. (1989). Subjects,
specifiers and X-bar theory. In M. Baltin & A. Kroch (Eds.), Alternative
conceptions of phrase structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sugimura, H. (1999). De
structure, anaphoric reference and classification. In L. Jiang & J. Hou (Eds.), A
study of present situation and history of Chinese: Collected works of the first international symposium on Chinese
linguistics (pp. 47–66). Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
Sweetser, E. (1988). Grammaticalization
and semantic bleaching. In S. Axmaker, A. J. Cantone, & B. D. Joseph (Eds.), General
session and parasession on
grammaticalization (pp. 389–405). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society.
Takahito, Y. (2004). Mengzi de chengshu niandai [The date of
Mengzi]. Limingguan Dongyang Shixue, No. 27.
Tang, T. -C. (1983). Focusing
constructions in Chinese: Cleft sentences and pseudo-cleft
sentences. In T. -C. Tang, R. L. Cheng, & Y. -C. Li (Eds.), Studies
in Chinese syntax and
semantics (pp. 127–226). Taipei: Student Book Co., Ltd.
Tang, Y. (1991). Zhuming zhongnian yuyanxuejia ziyuanji [The collection of the
autobiographies of the renowned
linguists]. Hefei: Anhui Jiaoyu Chubanshe.
Teng, S. -H. (1979). Remarks
on cleft sentences in Chinese. Journal of Chinese
Linguistics, 7(1), 101–114.
Torrent, T. T. (2015). On
the relation between inheritance and change: The constructional convergence and construction network reconfiguration
hypotheses. In H. Barðdal, et al. (Eds.), (pp. 173–211).
Traugott, E. C. (1988). Pragmatic
strengthening and grammaticalization. In Proceedings of the 14th
Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Parasession on
Grammaticalization (pp. 406–416). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B. (2002). Regularity
in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, E. C. (2007). The
concepts of constructional mismatch and type-shifting. Cognitive
Linguistics, 18, 523–557.
(2008). ‘All
that he endeavoured to prove was…’: On the emergence of grammatical constructions in dialogic
contexts. In R. Cooper & R. Kempson (Eds.), Language
in flux: Dialogue coordination, language variation, change and
evolution (pp. 143–177). London: Kings College Publications.
(2009). Lexicalization
and grammaticalization, subjectification, intersubjectification, and
grammaticalization. Studies in Historical
Linguistics, 2, 241–271. Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.
(2012). Toward
a coherent account of grammatical constructionalization. Draft for a volume on historical construction
grammar edited by E. Smirnova, M. Fried, S. Gildea, & L. Sommerer. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
(2014). Toward
a constructional framework for research on language. Cognitive Linguistic
Studies, 1, 3–21.
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G. (2010). Gradience,
gradualness and grammaticalization: How do they intersect? In E. C. Traugott & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Gradience,
gradualness and
grammaticalization (pp. 19–44). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Traugott, E. C. (2022). Discourse
structuring markers in English: A historical constructionalist perspective on
pragmatics. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Trousdale, G. (2010). Issues
in constructional approaches to grammaticalization in
English. In K. Stathi, E. Gehweiler, & E. König (Eds.), Grammaticalization:
Current views and
issues (pp. 51–72). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
(2014). On
the relationship between grammaticalization and
constructionalization. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Tsao, F. -F. (1990). Sentence
and clause structure in Chinese: A functional
perspective. Taipei: Student Book Co., Ltd.
Ungerer, T., & Hartmann, S. (2023). Constructionist
approaches: Past, present, future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van de Velde, F., De Smet, H., & Ghesquière, L. (2013). On
multiple source constructions in language change. Studies in
Language, 37(3), 473–488.
Wan, Q. (2013). Shitai ju Zhong de ‘de’ [‘De’ in the sentences of state
affairs]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of
the Chinese
Language, 1], 185–201.
Wang, H. (1987). Guanyu mingcihua biaoji zhi de Xiaoshi [The disappearance of
the nominalizer zhe]. Yuyanxue
Luncong [Articles of
Linguistics, 4], 158–196.
Wang, L. (1937/1958). Zhongguo
wenfa zhong de xici [The copula in Chinese grammar]. In L. Wang, Hanyushi Lunwenji [The collection of the articles on historical
Chinese] (pp. 212–276). Beijing: Beijing Press.
(1984). Wang Li wenji [The collection of the articles from Wang
Li]. Jinan: Shandong Jiaoyu Chubanshe.
Wang, G. (2003). Guoqu wancheng tibiaoji ‘de’ zai duihua yuti Zhong de shiyong tiaojian [The conditions of using the perfective aspectual marker de in
conversations]. Yuyan Yanjiu [Language
Studies, 4], 76–92.
Wei, S. (2002). Shishuoxinyu ji Zhu Chengshu Niandai Kao [The dates of
Shishuoxinyu and its commentary]. Changzhou Shizhuan
Xuebao [Journal of Changzhou
Shizhuan], 3, 19–20.
Wu, F. (1997). Jindai Hanyu gangyao [Early Modern Chinese
studies]. Changsha: Hunan Education Press.
Xiong, Z. (2007). Shi…de goujian fenxi [The analysis of the structure of
shi…de]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese
Language, 4], 321–330.
Xu, J. (2001). The
principle of universal grammar and Chinese grammar
phenomenon. Beijing: Peking University Press.
Xu, L., & Liu, D. (1998). The
structure and functions of topics. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.
Xu, L. (2002). Hanyu shi huati jiegouhua yuyan ma? [Is Chinese a
topic-structuralized language?]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese
Language, 5], 400–410.
Xu, L., & Pan, H. (2005). Jiaodian jiegou he yiyi de yanjiu [The structure and function of
focus]. Beijing: Waiyuyanjiu Chubanshe.
Yang, K., & He, Q. (2022). The
development of V de O clefts in Chinese: A diachronic constructionist
approach. Lingua, 270, 103214.
Yap, F. H., & Wang, J. (2011). From
light noun to nominalizer and more: The grammaticalization of zhe and suo in Old and Middle
Chinese. In F. H. Yap, K. Grunow-Hårsta, & J. Wrona (Eds.), Nominalization
in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives (Typological Studies in
Language, 96, pp. 61–107). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Yap, F. H., & Matthews, S. (2008). The
development of nominalizers in East Asian and Tibeto-Burman
languages. In M. J. López-Couso & E. Seoane (Eds.), Rethinking
grammaticalization: New perspectives (Typological Studies in
Language, 76, pp. 309–341). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Yap, F. H., & Grunow-Hårsta, K. (2010). Non-referential
uses of nominalization constructions: Asian perspectives. Language and Linguistics
Compass, 4(12), 1154–1175.
Yap, F. H., Choi, P. -L., & Cheung, K. S. (2010). De-lexicalizing
di3: How a Chinese locative noun has evolved into an attitudinal
nominalizer. In A. Van Linden, J. -C. Verstraete, & K. Davidse (Eds.), Formal
evidence in grammaticalization research (Typological Studies in
Language, 94, pp. 63–91). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Yap, F. H., Grunow-Hårsta, K., & Wrona, J. (Eds.). (2011). Nominalization
in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives (Typological Studies in
Language, 96). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Yen, S. L. (1986). The
origin of the copula shì in Chinese. Journal of Chinese
Linguistics, 14(2), 227–241.
Yuan, Y. -L. (2003). Cong jiaodian lilun kan juwei de de jufa yuyi gongneng [On the
syntactic and semantic function of de in the sentence final position: From a viewpoint of the modern focus
theory]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the
Chinese
Language, 292], 3–16.
Zehentner, E. (2019). On
competition and cooperation in language change: The case of dative alternation in
English. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Zhan, F. (2012). The
structure and function of the Chinese copular construction (Doctoral
dissertation). Stanford University.
(2020). The
development of the Chinese expressive zhenshide: A diachronic constructional
approach. Lingua, 248.
(2025a). The
development of the Chinese multifunctional construction V+qilai: From a complement-taking predicate to a discourse
marker. Pragmatics.
(2025b). Re-evaluating
the dynamics of subjectification, intersubjectification, and textualization from a constructional perspective: The development
of the pragmatic marker jiushi in Chinese. Chinese Language and
Discourse.
(2025c). The
development of [Patient-Subj V-qilai AP] as a Middle Construction in
Chinese. Languages, 10(6), 131.
Zhan, F., & Sun, C. (2013). A
copula analysis of shì in the Chinese cleft construction. Language and
Linguistics, 14(4), 755–789.
Zhan, F., & Traugott, E. C. (2015). The
constructionalization of the Chinese cleft construction. Studies in
Language, 39(2), 459–491.
(2019). The
development of the Chinese copula shì construction: A diachronic constructional
perspective. Functions of
Language, 26(2), 139–176.
Zhan, F., & Traugott, E. (2020). A
study of the development of the Chinese correlative comparative construction from the perspective of
constructionalization. Diachronica, 37(1), 83–126.
Zhan, F., & Pan, H. (2022). Zailun kuang, zhai jiaodian [A revisit to the broad and narrow
focus in Modern Chinese]. Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue [International Chinese
Teaching], 36(4), 462–475.
(2023). The
development of the Chinese V de O cleft construction: A constructional approach. Studies in
Language, 47(2), 318–349.
Zhan, F., Traugott, E. C., & Han, X. (2020). Yufahua he goushihua chayi [Differences between grammaticalization and constructionalization]. 辞书研究 [Lexicographical Studies] 06: 53–68.
Zhan, F., Zhang, Y., & Long, H. (2021). Origin
of Modern Chinese pragmatic markers bushi: Negative copula or negative
adjective? Lingua, 250.
Zhan, W., Guo, R., & Chen, Y. (2003). The
CCL Corpus of Chinese texts: 700 million Chinese characters, the 11th Century B.C.–present. [URL]
Zhang, B., & Fang, M. (2001). Hanyu gongneng yufa yanjiu [Chinese functional
grammar]. Nanchang: Jiangxi Jiaoyu Chubanshe.
Zhang, L., & Yang, R. (2019). S V de O de laiyuan ji xiangguan wenti [The origin of the
focus construction S V de O]. Yuwen Yanjiu [Linguistic
Research, 1], 8–16.
(1985). Hanyu fangyan zhong de liangzhong fanfu wenju [Two repeated
questions in Chinese grammar]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese
Language] 1, 62–80.
Zhu, D. X. (1999). Zhu Dexi wenji [Collected works of Zhu
Dexi] (Vols. 1–5). Shanghai: The Commercial Press.
Zhu, M. (1991). Zhuziyulei jufa yanjiu [A study on Zhuziyulei
syntax]. Wuhan: Changjiang Wenyi Press.
Zhu, Y. (1997). The
focus-marking function of shi in Mandarin Chinese (Doctoral
dissertation). University of Minnesota.